Re: changing the size of the image that's combined with text

2016-02-15 Thread Scott Rossi
Hi Matt: The imageSource property is the one you're looking for, and AFAIK, using a hidden or offscreen image is the way to adjust what is displayed in the field. If you have an image in a field whose imageSource is assigned to an imported image, and you resize the imported image, you should see

changing the size of the image that's combined with text

2016-02-15 Thread Matt Maier
This is one of those times when I end up sending an hour just trying to find out if I know what keywords to search for. Anywho, I want to combine images with text in a field. I found the right syntax for writing html that will combine text and images: lerg and also that the char reference isn't

Re: create field suddenly not a good chunk

2016-02-15 Thread Scott Rossi
Did you include "stack" in the variable name? Pretty sure you just need the stack's name, so maybe that was causing a failure. As a quick and dirty test, I tried creating 3 new stacks, and executed variations of this line from the message box: set defaultStack to "untitled 3";create fld When

Re: create field suddenly not a good chunk

2016-02-15 Thread Matt Maier
It didn't. I set the defaultstack once when the whole thing loaded and again right before creating the field, then had it put the defaultstack into a variable so I could confirm it was correct. The words in the variable were exactly what I wrote on the line (stack "HowstrBeta"). On Mon, Feb 15,

Re: create field suddenly not a good chunk

2016-02-15 Thread Scott Rossi
If the goal is create an object in a specified stack, does setting the defaultStack first not work? Regards, Scott Rossi Creative Director Tactile Media, UX/UI Design On 2/15/16, 8:35 PM, "use-livecode on behalf of Matt Maier"

Re: create field suddenly not a good chunk

2016-02-15 Thread Monte Goulding
> On 16 Feb 2016, at 4:17 PM, Matt Maier wrote: > > Could this be similar? If it worked it may have been a result of lax parsing which I think has been tightened up a bit in 8. Someone on the core team might be able to comment on that. Cheers Monte

Re: create field suddenly not a good chunk

2016-02-15 Thread Matt Maier
If I'm following that you think it's weird you have to create an object inside a group, rather than just on a stack/card, then that's weird because that's exactly what I'm doing. I've been creating bunches of objects and never bothered with groups. A while back I was using arbitrary strings of

Re: create field suddenly not a good chunk

2016-02-15 Thread Monte Goulding
> On 16 Feb 2016, at 3:56 PM, Matt Maier wrote: > > Weird that it would parse for so long and then suddenly stop parsing, but > then accept a form that it looks like still shouldn't parse. On a related note it seems odd to me that you can create an object in a group but

Re: create field suddenly not a good chunk

2016-02-15 Thread Matt Maier
A bunch of the properties of the templateField got set right before that. Then that line (which was "create field stack 'whatever'" and was working fine) Then put "put it into tID" which gave me the ID of the newly created field. I just needed a field created for each node in the network. Weird

Re: create field suddenly not a good chunk

2016-02-15 Thread Monte Goulding
> On 16 Feb 2016, at 3:35 PM, Matt Maier wrote: > > As far as I know I didn't make any changes that would explain this. > > All of a sudden this line: "create field stack "HowstrBeta" is giving me > this error "(Chunk: source is not a container), char 1" > > After some

create field suddenly not a good chunk

2016-02-15 Thread Matt Maier
As far as I know I didn't make any changes that would explain this. All of a sudden this line: "create field stack "HowstrBeta" is giving me this error "(Chunk: source is not a container), char 1" After some experimentation and googling I discovered that it would work again if I changed that

Re: Free BasicClock desktop clock for OSX

2016-02-15 Thread Kay C Lan
On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 7:47 PM, Peter TB Brett wrote: > > Is your clock open source? At the moment it has "All rights reserved" in > the copyright... > > I don't have a Community Edition of LC in front of me but I know for the other editions: All rights reserved

Re: Signing Identity Issue When Building Standalone

2016-02-15 Thread Scott Rossi
Hi Pierre: Apparently, a lot of people (including myself) didn't get or see the message. https://www.reddit.com/r/iOSProgramming/comments/45siza/this_certificate_ha s_an_invalid_issuer/ Regards, Scott Rossi Creative Director Tactile Media, UX/UI Design On 2/15/16, 1:46 PM, "use-livecode on

Fwd: Signing Identity Issue When Building Standalone

2016-02-15 Thread Pierre Sahores
Scott, They (Apple) announced this certificate update need (because their own switch needs) by email last week. > Le 15 févr. 2016 à 21:40, Scott Rossi a écrit : > > If any of you are having difficulty building iOS standalones today, you're > not alone. Apple's own

Rép : some AB testing ...

2016-02-15 Thread Pierre Sahores
Dear Livecoders, I promise to be back with some final tests and related thoughts and here they are. All tests went carefully done in using both ApacheBench 2.3 Revision 1528965 and Siege 3.0.5 with same average results. Only the Siege ones are reported there to maintain this report as readable

Re: Signing Identity Issue When Building Standalone

2016-02-15 Thread Randy Hengst
Thanks for the heads-up, Scott. be well, randy Randy Hengst www.classroomFocusedSoftware.com > On Feb 15, 2016, at 2:40 PM, Scott Rossi wrote: > > If any of you are having difficulty building iOS standalones today, you're > not alone. Apple's own Worldwide Developer

Signing Identity Issue When Building Standalone

2016-02-15 Thread Scott Rossi
If any of you are having difficulty building iOS standalones today, you're not alone. Apple's own Worldwide Developer Relations Certificate expired yesterday (Feb 14) which will likely cause your developer certificates to display with an "This certificate has an invalid user" error message, and

Re: Free BasicClock desktop clock for OSX

2016-02-15 Thread Howard Bornstein
It's closed source for the time being. On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 3:47 AM, Peter TB Brett wrote: > > On 14/02/2016 20:55, Howard Bornstein wrote: > > So many clocks today still employ the flip-clock or 7-segment LED display > > aesthetic that is at least 20 years old.

Re: Free BasicClock desktop clock for OSX

2016-02-15 Thread Howard Bornstein
On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 3:25 AM, FlexibleLearning.com < ad...@flexiblelearning.com> wrote: > Nice one, Howard. Hopefully your BasicClock will soon be available for > other > platforms also. > Thanks Hugh. It's OSX only because I don't run any other platforms to test it on. I suppose if someone

[ANN] This Week in LiveCode 20

2016-02-15 Thread Peter TB Brett
Hi all, Read about new developments in LiveCode open source and the open source community in today's edition of the "This Week in LiveCode" newsletter! Read issue #20 here: https://goo.gl/xmg1Rf This is a weekly newsletter about LiveCode, focussing on what's been going on in and around

Re: Free BasicClock desktop clock for OSX

2016-02-15 Thread Peter TB Brett
On 14/02/2016 20:55, Howard Bornstein wrote: > So many clocks today still employ the flip-clock or 7-segment LED display > aesthetic that is at least 20 years old. Given that we now have high > resolution displays and very high-quality fonts available, I wanted to make > a simple clock that

RE: Free BasicClock desktop clock for OSX

2016-02-15 Thread FlexibleLearning.com
Nice one, Howard. Hopefully your BasicClock will soon be available for other platforms also. 1. Free BasicClock You can see the features of BasicClock here: BasicClock Read Me.pdf http://designeq.com/deq/software/Welcome%20to%20BasicClock%20V2.04.pdf and download it here: BasicClock V2.04.zip