Re: disabled on 10/28 for bounces--to gmail???

2016-11-16 Thread Jacques Clavel
I don't understand why I was disabled for the third time from the list and received this message "excessive bounces" as I haven't sent message to the list since two years at least (but I read all posts). Jacques Clavel 2016-11-04 2:51 GMT+01:00 J. Landman Gay : > And this is a test post because

Re: Inconsistent results in simple script

2016-11-16 Thread Mike Bonner
Yeah, you can use the same handler because order doesn't matter. It sounded from your description like the barcode was unique to 1 item, so it should work dandy. Once the array is built (assuming you decide to leave it as an array and not combine it) the array is keyed by the barcode so its easy

Re: Inconsistent results in simple script

2016-11-16 Thread Richard Gaskin
JOHN PATTEN wrote: > When you don’t use arrays very much, and you have old, slow, brute > force scripting skills, arrays are kind of hard to wrap your head > around. But I obviously see their advantages :) Arrays are so useful in so many contexts that they're well worth spending an afternoon exp

Re: Inconsistent results in simple script

2016-11-16 Thread dunbarx
"and you have old, slow, brute force scripting skills, " on mouseUp repeat for each line tLine in fld "csv1" put line lineOffset(item 1 of tLine,fld "csv1") of fld "csv1" & "," & \ item 2 of line lineOffset(item 1 of tLine,fld "csv2") of fld "csv2" & return after temp end repeat put temp int

Re: Inconsistent results in simple script

2016-11-16 Thread dunbarx
"…find the correct line via the barcode in the serial number list? The resultant list combines all three parts of the data. To find any particular one, just use the lineOffset. answer line lineOffset("12345",tCombinedList) of tCombinedList No? Craig -- View this message in context: http:

Re: Inconsistent results in simple script

2016-11-16 Thread dunbarx
"The barcodes are not on the same lines in each list. " In that case what Richard did, using the barcode as keys, will obviate that issue. Do you see? With arrays, the appropriate data can be made to go only with its associated keys, and the order of play does not matter. So the barcodes rule the

Re: Inconsistent results in simple script

2016-11-16 Thread JOHN PATTEN
Thanks Everyone, One follow up question, how is the script that Richard provided: on mouseUp put fld "csv1" into tStudentArray split tStudentArray by cr and comma put fld "csv2" into tDeviceArray split tDeviceArray by cr and comma repeat for each key tStudentID in tStudentArray put

Re: Inconsistent results in simple script

2016-11-16 Thread Richard Gaskin
JOHN PATTEN wrote: > I have two, two column lists. Each list has the same barcode item > (item 1). The second item in the first list is a username, and the > second item in the second list is a serial number. I am trying to > combine the username and serial number into one list. I have about > 10

Re: Inconsistent results in simple script

2016-11-16 Thread JOHN PATTEN
Thanks Mike and Craig, One of my challenges is the two lists do not mirror each other by barcode number. The barcodes are not on the same lines in each list. That is why I was running the “find barcode in list two.” I have teachers and other staff in the list of serial numbers and I was hoping

Re: Inconsistent results in simple script

2016-11-16 Thread Mike Bonner
Craig is right, this is asking to be an array, though if you prefer a flat file you can combine it at the end like so. on mouseUp repeat for each line tLine in field "csv1" put item 2 of tLine into tDataA[item 1 of tLine] end repeat repeat for each line tLIne in field "csv2" put comma & ite

Re: Inconsistent results in simple script

2016-11-16 Thread dunbarx
Ah. OK, put the first list snippet into a field named "csv1" and the second snippet into a field named "csv2". Now make a button and put this into its script: on mouseUp put fld "csv1" into student put fld "csv2" into serNum repeat with y = 1 to the number of lines of student pu

Re: Inconsistent results in simple script

2016-11-16 Thread JOHN PATTEN
Hi Craig, I have about 1000 students that are in a library system showing them as having checked out an iPad. In the library system it uses the student username and the barcode as the item identifier. I have another list that shows our iPads by barcode and serial number. Unfortunately there is

Re: Inconsistent results in simple script

2016-11-16 Thread dunbarx
On another note, are you an old Hypercard user? I noticed you used the term "cd fld". Craig -- View this message in context: http://runtime-revolution.278305.n4.nabble.com/Inconsistent-results-in-simple-script-tp4710376p4710378.html Sent from the Revolution - User mailing list archive at Nabbl

Re: Inconsistent results in simple script

2016-11-16 Thread dunbarx
HI. So, a single list. What is the relationship between the fact that a particular barcode refers both to a student and a serial number? In other words, if you had a single list, how would "12345" relate to both "john doe" and "SDTKNY12345"? Would you simply have two lines: 12345,johndoe 12345,SD

Inconsistent results in simple script

2016-11-16 Thread JOHN PATTEN
Hi All, I have two, two column lists. Each list has the same barcode item (item 1). The second item in the first list is a username, and the second item in the second list is a serial number. I am trying to combine the username and serial number into one list. I have about 1000 lines in each li

Re: autoScript

2016-11-16 Thread Mike Bonner
I've found a way to make it fail, but find it is very unlikely it is the cause of your issue (because its a silly little thing) But out of curiosity. if you add some type of msg box output to the handler that sets the script of the button, this would ensure that the setting handler actually fires.

Re: autoScript

2016-11-16 Thread Lagi Pittas
Hi Richmond I understand that , i'm just suggesting you create a brand new stack with that button don't use the same one., and type it in from scratch no cut and paste even Best Lagi On 16 November 2016 at 17:25, Richmond wrote: > The original stack was created in 8.1.1. > > /Deus ex machina

[ANN] LiveCode for FM Brings Easy Flexible Coding to FileMaker Apps

2016-11-16 Thread Heather Laine
Dear List members, Today we are proud to announce the first release of the LiveCode for FM beta: https://filemaker.livecode.com This allows you to use the power of LiveCode inside FileMaker, bringing the best of both worlds to your app. FileMaker excels at providing data driven capabilities wh

Re: autoScript

2016-11-16 Thread Richmond
I just tried the stack in LC 8.1.2 rc2 and that didn't set the script either. Richmond. On 16.11.2016 19:13, J. Landman Gay wrote: Okay. That usually means there's an error in it that prevents compilation. Since it does work in LC 9 maybe the error was in the engine or the IDE. Jacqueline L

Re: autoScript

2016-11-16 Thread Richmond
The original stack was created in 8.1.1. /Deus ex machina/ Richmond. On 16.11.2016 19:09, Lagi Pittas wrote: Hi Richmond I know this might sound stupid but . Did you create a BRAND NEW stack within 8.1 and try that? Now if you opened it in 9 and it worked that still doesn't mean what I

Re: autoScript

2016-11-16 Thread J. Landman Gay
I should have used a smiley. Killing children is frowned upon by almost everyone. -> :-) On November 16, 2016 10:57:17 AM Richmond wrote: This is, exactly, one of the reasons I like Livecode so much: it lends itself to all styles of "getting things done" ! Richmond. On 16.11.2016 17:48, J

Re: autoScript

2016-11-16 Thread J. Landman Gay
Okay. That usually means there's an error in it that prevents compilation. Since it does work in LC 9 maybe the error was in the engine or the IDE. Jacqueline Landman Gay | jac...@hyperactivesw.com HyperActive Software | http://www.hyperactivesw.com On November 16, 2

Re: autoScript

2016-11-16 Thread Lagi Pittas
Hi Richmond I know this might sound stupid but . Did you create a BRAND NEW stack within 8.1 and try that? Now if you opened it in 9 and it worked that still doesn't mean what I suggest won't work because these are computers we are working with. Sometimes they are not logical (because we don

Re: autoScript

2016-11-16 Thread Richmond
The script does not get set. Richmond. On 16.11.2016 17:58, J. Landman Gay wrote: Could you define "does not work"? The script doesn't get set? It's there but it errors? It's lazy? Jacqueline Landman Gay | jac...@hyperactivesw.com HyperActive Software | http://www.hy

Re: autoScript

2016-11-16 Thread Richmond
I am very, very far from being a purist, lest you have not worked that out many long years ago. When I submitted a Master's degree thesis in Applied Linguistics at Southern Illinois University at Carbondale I was criticised by 2 out of 3 of my degree committee for not sticking to 'pure' Cognit

Re: Recoding: search and replace

2016-11-16 Thread Richmond
Thanks, but to be honest I'm not worried about speed: I can go and have a bath, listen to some music, and, heaven forfend (!), go and spend some time talking with my wife. As Devawriter Pro is an ongoing project (7 years and counting) that has brought me almost exactl $300 so far the speed at

Re: excessive bounces

2016-11-16 Thread Heather Laine
I think I heard my name a couple of times... There does seem to be an unusual amount of bouncing going on. I've turned on some options in mailman to try and see if I can catch some and figure it out, but I would not hold your breath. I've found mailman to be a very intransigent piece of softwar

AW: German Umlaute get corrupted on macOS Sierra

2016-11-16 Thread Tiemo Hollmann TB
Hello Hermann and Paul, good idea, but my customer checked "Tahoma" with the fontbook and it is installed and looks fine in the fontbook. I also tried the indirect enter with holding the "u" for 2 sec and then choosing the "ü" from the menu, but the letter also is corrupted, when displayed in th

Re: autoScript

2016-11-16 Thread J. Landman Gay
Could you define "does not work"? The script doesn't get set? It's there but it errors? It's lazy? Jacqueline Landman Gay | jac...@hyperactivesw.com HyperActive Software | http://www.hyperactivesw.com On November 16, 2016 8:48:57 AM Richmond wrote: I honestly don'

Re: autoScript

2016-11-16 Thread Bob Sneidar
I worked on this once, but I became a comic book kid and all my money was Monopoly money. Thanks for the Undo script Mike! Bob S > On Nov 16, 2016, at 05:53 , Tore Nilsen wrote: > > Has anyone ever been able to make the “makeMeRich” command work? If not, has > anyone filed a bug report? > >

Re: autoScript

2016-11-16 Thread Bob Sneidar
:-) Bob S > On Nov 16, 2016, at 05:49 , Mike Bonner wrote: > > On the contrary, when i tried it here I became hot and delicious, and great > to wake up to in the morning. Alas, I had added an undo function and have > since reverted to my normal hermity self. I tried "make me rich" once, but >

[ANN} Release 8.1.2 RC-2

2016-11-16 Thread panagiotis merakos
Dear list members, We are pleased to announce the release of LiveCode 8.1.2 RC-2. Getting the Release === You can get the release at https://downloads.livecode.com/livecode/ or via the automatic updater. Release Contents LiveCode 8.1.2 RC-2 contains bug fixes, st

Re: excessive bounces

2016-11-16 Thread Bob Sneidar
make that SPAM filters. Bob S On Nov 15, 2016, at 09:02 , Bob Sneidar mailto:bobsnei...@iotecdigital.com>> wrote: I think someone or something is poisoning the snap filters. JMHO ___ use-livecode mailing list use-livecode@lists.runrev.com Please vis

Re: autoScript

2016-11-16 Thread J. Landman Gay
It sounds to me like there's a problem with the inheritance path. You could try looping through the childIDs and deleting any that are interfering. Note that you may be criticized by purists for this type of coding style. Jacqueline Landman Gay | jac...@hyperactivesw.com HyperActive

Re: Recoding: search and replace

2016-11-16 Thread Mike Bonner
The only thing I would do different would be to use the "repeat for each" form rather than putting into lines. If your script is really long, the time savings will add up. I THINK it will make an even greater difference because you a) have to look at a specific line, then b) you have to grab the

Re: Recoding: search and replace

2016-11-16 Thread Tore Nilsen
And this should be: on mouseUp put script of image "xxx" into tScriptToChange put 0 into tLineNumber repeat for each line tLine in tScriptToChange add 1 to tLineNumber if "unicodeText" is in tLine then put replaceText(tLine,"unicodeT","t") into line tLineNumber of tScriptToChange end if if

Re: Recoding: search and replace

2016-11-16 Thread Tore Nilsen
I think this will be even faster. Put the script directly into a variable, use a repeat for structure and replace text as needed directly in the variable. You may not notice much of a speed improvement for smaller scripts, but if the script is longer, this should execute faster than your version

Re: Recoding: search and replace

2016-11-16 Thread Richmond
So; here I am, as per usual, replying to my own message having found that nothing quite so elaborate was required: /put empty into fld "fSSS1"// // put the script of img "xxx" into fld "fSSS1"// // put the number of lines of fld "fSSS1" into TERMINUS// // put 1 into QOUNT// // repeat unt

Re: autoScript

2016-11-16 Thread Mike Bonner
Did you check the result after setting it? Hopefully it will tell you why it failed. On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 7:47 AM, Richmond wrote: > I honestly don't know. > > I have just tried my stack in LC 9dp1 and, yes, the thing worked. > > So I tried it again in LC 8.1.1 and the thing did not work. >

Re: savingStandalone message

2016-11-16 Thread Bob Sneidar
Okay my standalone building bug is probably related to this one. I can provide any testing and feedback you need on this. For instance, I just quit all versions of Livecode, opened LC 8.1.2 rc1, ONLY opened the splash stack and NOTHING ELSE, tried to compile, and I get this dialog: A stack with

Re: autoScript

2016-11-16 Thread Richmond
I honestly don't know. I have just tried my stack in LC 9dp1 and, yes, the thing worked. So I tried it again in LC 8.1.1 and the thing did not work. Richmond. On 16.11.2016 16:13, Richard Gaskin wrote: Richmond wrote: Nothing is wrong with this in Livecode 7.1.4 BUT is does not work in Liv

Re: autoScript

2016-11-16 Thread Tore Nilsen
Will the chances of getting rich increase if the randomSeed property is set to a higher value? I guess the the blindLuck() function makes heavy use of random(goodLuck) Or maybe there is an undocumented goodLuckSeed property lurking somewhere in the darkest corners of the engine? > 16. nov. 201

Re: autoScript

2016-11-16 Thread Richard Gaskin
Richmond wrote: Nothing is wrong with this in Livecode 7.1.4 BUT is does not work in Livecode 8.1.1 Bug 18864 Richmond. On 16.11.2016 14:44, Richmond wrote: I wonder what's wrong with this: on mouseUp put "make me coffee" into SKRIPT set the script of btn "BB" to SKRIPT end mouseUp

Re: autoScript

2016-11-16 Thread Mike Bonner
My apology for the inadvertent foray into the kink domain. The only kinks in my life are on the radio, and in my neck. (shuts up now to avoid digging the hole deeper) On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 7:02 AM, Richmond wrote: > Dunno about that: I suffer from hardWork, creativity and perseverance, but > t

Re: autoScript

2016-11-16 Thread Richmond
Dunno about that: I suffer from hardWork, creativity and perseverance, but there are no signs on even payForMyCoffee let alone makeMeRich . . . could be something to do with too many uses of the term 'wrongNiche' in my code . . . now back to the Sanskrit . . . Love, Richmond. On 16.11.2016

Re: autoScript

2016-11-16 Thread Richmond
Erm: "I became hot and delicious" (sounds a bit kinky, frankly), not any potential coffee . . . Richmond. On 16.11.2016 15:49, Mike Bonner wrote: On the contrary, when i tried it here I became hot and delicious, and great to wake up to in the morning. Alas, I had added an undo function and ha

Re: autoScript

2016-11-16 Thread Richmond
Ha, Ha; yes, to be honest, I am drinking coffee I made myself; but, for the purposes of the posting I decided to NOT give you the 5204 line script I am trying to move: that would be worse than the disappointment of finding that Livecode could not make coffee! Richmond. On 16.11.2016 15:43, Tor

Re: autoScript

2016-11-16 Thread Mike Bonner
I suspect its a misunderstanding of the command. If I recall correctly it requires a library of support function such as hardWork() creativity() and perseverance() Though I guess there are a few people out there who make it work by simply using the blindLuck() function over and over until the rng

Re: autoScript

2016-11-16 Thread Tore Nilsen
Has anyone ever been able to make the “makeMeRich” command work? If not, has anyone filed a bug report? Tore > 16. nov. 2016 kl. 14.49 skrev Mike Bonner : > > On the contrary, when i tried it here I became hot and delicious, and great > to wake up to in the morning. Alas, I had added an undo fu

Re: autoScript

2016-11-16 Thread Mike Bonner
On the contrary, when i tried it here I became hot and delicious, and great to wake up to in the morning. Alas, I had added an undo function and have since reverted to my normal hermity self. I tried "make me rich" once, but I just ended up being triple chocolate cake. On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 6:4

Re: autoScript

2016-11-16 Thread Tore Nilsen
At this point in the discussion I feel a need to clarify that while also the original the script (make me coffee) was set, the button BB did not actually make coffee. I still had to go to the kitchen and perform the necessary magic myself. And I think that most people will find that making cof

Re: autoScript

2016-11-16 Thread Mike Bonner
Ah, my apologies. In that case I'm surprised it DOESN'T work in 8 (when including on mouseup and end mouseup) Now I'm curious. If I recall correctly, setting a script with an error of some type, causes the script to be placed into the button but not actually be functional. Since the more recent

Re: autoScript

2016-11-16 Thread Richmond
I didn't bother to include the 'on mouseUp' and 'end mouseUp' in my initial message as I thought they would be assumed. Richmond. On 16.11.2016 15:24, Mike Bonner wrote: I'm surprised it works in 7 since it should result in an orphaned line of code with no handler designation. (as indicated by

Re: autoScript

2016-11-16 Thread Mike Bonner
I'm surprised it works in 7 since it should result in an orphaned line of code with no handler designation. (as indicated by tore, you should need to include the on mouseup and end mouseup) On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 6:22 AM, Tore Nilsen wrote: > On MacOS 10.12.2 > > > > 16. nov. 2016 kl. 14.21 sk

Re: autoScript

2016-11-16 Thread Tore Nilsen
On MacOS 10.12.2 > 16. nov. 2016 kl. 14.21 skrev Richmond : > > Thanks, Tore, > > On which operating system is that? > > Richmond. > > On 16.11.2016 15:10, Tore Nilsen wrote: >> Putting >> >> on mouseUp >> >> put "on mouseUp" & return & "beep" & return & "end mouseUp" into SKRIPT >> >> set

Re: autoScript

2016-11-16 Thread Richmond
Thanks, Tore, On which operating system is that? Richmond. On 16.11.2016 15:10, Tore Nilsen wrote: Putting on mouseUp put "on mouseUp" & return & "beep" & return & "end mouseUp" into SKRIPT set the script of btn "BB" to SKRIPT end mouseUp into the script of the first button makes button

Re: autoScript

2016-11-16 Thread Tore Nilsen
Putting on mouseUp put "on mouseUp" & return & "beep" & return & "end mouseUp" into SKRIPT set the script of btn "BB" to SKRIPT end mouseUp into the script of the first button makes button BB trigger a beep as expected, also in LC 8.1.1 Regards Tore > 16. nov. 2016 kl. 13.57 skrev Richmo

Re: autoScript

2016-11-16 Thread Tore Nilsen
It works in both 7.1.3 and 8.1.0 and 8.1.1 on MacOS here with me. The script is set to whatever you put into the variable. Tore > 16. nov. 2016 kl. 13.57 skrev Richmond : > > Nothing is wrong with this in Livecode 7.1.4 > > BUT is does not work in Livecode 8.1.1 > > Bug 18864 > > Richmond. >

Re: autoScript

2016-11-16 Thread Richmond
Nothing is wrong with this in Livecode 7.1.4 BUT is does not work in Livecode 8.1.1 Bug 18864 Richmond. On 16.11.2016 14:44, Richmond wrote: I wonder what's wrong with this: on mouseUp put "make me coffee" into SKRIPT set the script of btn "BB" to SKRIPT end mouseUp Richmond.

autoScript

2016-11-16 Thread Richmond
I wonder what's wrong with this: on mouseUp put "make me coffee" into SKRIPT set the script of btn "BB" to SKRIPT end mouseUp Richmond. ___ use-livecode mailing list use-livecode@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe

[OT] lodging in Vienna

2016-11-16 Thread Richmond
I have a 19 year old boy (ex-student of mine) who is currently in Vienna and stuck for lodgings; he needs somewhere (room) for about 4-5 months. I would be most grateful if anyone who stays in the area and knows of something could revert to me immediately. Richmond. __

Re: recode: set the useUnicode

2016-11-16 Thread Richmond
Thanks. On 16.11.2016 10:51, Peter TB Brett wrote: On 16/11/2016 08:47, Richmond wrote: I am currently working on a series of automated routines to recode my Devawriter Pro stack from Livecode 4.5 to Livecode 8/9 and . . . my code is peppered with set the useUnicode to true and set the us

Re: recode: set the useUnicode

2016-11-16 Thread Peter TB Brett
On 16/11/2016 08:47, Richmond wrote: I am currently working on a series of automated routines to recode my Devawriter Pro stack from Livecode 4.5 to Livecode 8/9 and . . . my code is peppered with set the useUnicode to true and set the useUnicode to false statements. Does anyone know if I

recode: set the useUnicode

2016-11-16 Thread Richmond
I am currently working on a series of automated routines to recode my Devawriter Pro stack from Livecode 4.5 to Livecode 8/9 and . . . my code is peppered with set the useUnicode to true and set the useUnicode to false statements. Does anyone know if I have to remove them, or will they just

Re: replaceText usage

2016-11-16 Thread Richmond
You're a star! This works perfectly: put line QOUNT of fld "fSSS1" into PROCESST put replaceText(PROCESST,"unicodeT","t") into line QOUNT of fld "fSSS1" Thank you buckets! However, inevitably I cannot resist the occasion to have a "b*tchy" grumble: The documentation is not up to scratch on re

Re: replaceText usage

2016-11-16 Thread Mike Bonner
I have a feeling you're trying to do something that I'm missing but I'll give it a shot.. you put line QOUNT into variable processt.. but then you don't actually use the variable. If you're wanting to actually change the line itself you would need to do replace "unicodeText" as the first parameter