Re: Encrypted standalones

2019-04-18 Thread prothero--- via use-livecode
I’ll be interested in hearing the answer to this. I had assumed that the setup would be a splash stack that loaded the other app stacks, which were in the resources folder. True? Bill William Prothero http://es.earthednet.org > On Apr 18, 2019, at 9:25 PM, Richard Gaskin via use-livecode >

Re: Encrypted standalones

2019-04-18 Thread Richard Gaskin via use-livecode
J. Landman Gay jacque at hyperactivesw.com > It's not actually a regression, it's always been that way. But it's > too piddly to bother the team with right now, and there's a > workaround. Maybe It's curious that the entire Stacks pane is disabled when either mobile platform is selected. That

Re: Encrypted standalones

2019-04-18 Thread J. Landman Gay via use-livecode
It's not actually a regression, it's always been that way. But it's too piddly to bother the team with right now, and there's a workaround. Maybe I'll ask why it works that way when I see them at the conference. -- Jacqueline Landman Gay | jac...@hyperactivesw.com HyperActive Software |

Re: Encrypted standalones

2019-04-18 Thread Richard Gaskin via use-livecode
J. Landman Gay wrote: > ...encrypted scripts don't matter in the app stores. So I'm still > wondering what the reason is for disabling it in the SB. The key question is whether the disabling was intentional. If it's a regression while making other changes it all makes sense. Without a bug

Re: Encrypted standalones

2019-04-18 Thread J. Landman Gay via use-livecode
Apparently my theory of why we can't do it in the standalone builder was wrong, and encrypted scripts don't matter in the app stores. So I'm still wondering what the reason is for disabling it in the SB. I knew how to set a password on a stack, but if you do that then you have to enter the

LC9.0.4rc2: Problem with Ask dialog not being included in standalone?

2019-04-18 Thread Paul Dupuis via use-livecode
I just was creating a simple test stack under Windows 10, LC9.0.4rc2 and discovered that whether I allowed automatic selection of inclusions or explicitly included the Ask/Answer dialogs, the Ask dialog was not being included in my Windows standalone of this test stack. See

Re: Encrypted standalones

2019-04-18 Thread Bob Sneidar via use-livecode
I'm sure you meant the source code is encrypted. The stack itself is never encrypted. Bob S > On Apr 18, 2019, at 09:30 , JJS via use-livecode > wrote: > > If you use this sentence in the message box (which i got from another fine > member here) the stack is encrypted, and when turned

Re: Browser HTML Source & URLs

2019-04-18 Thread hh via use-livecode
What you've seen is the difference of the htmltext of a browser (also of a browser widget) and the *generated* htmltext. The latter includes for example also parts that are generated by JavaScript parts of the htmltext. > BobS. wrote: > I've seen that too. > > > Rick H. wrote: > > I thought it

Re: Encrypted standalones

2019-04-18 Thread JJS via use-livecode
If you use this sentence in the message box (which i got from another fine member here) the stack is encrypted, and when turned into an APK is well accepted by Google Play Store: *set*thepasswordofstack"beststackever"to"mostdifficultpasswordofalltimes" Op 18-4-2019 om 02:33 schreef Richard

Re: Browser HTML Source & URLs

2019-04-18 Thread Bob Sneidar via use-livecode
I've seen that too. Bob S > On Apr 17, 2019, at 11:22 , Rick Harrison via use-livecode > wrote: > > Thanks for getting back to me on this. > >> The htmltext is the page source code. So >> >> put the htmltext of widget "browser" into field 1 > > I thought it was the source code originally