Re: Box2D
That is not the point , it seems that they are adding other stuff before implementing what was paid for the new sqlite api/framework for instance. People keep on asking about sound and there is zilch. just cos nobody is asking about box2d doesn't mean it's not wanted -what are the chances now if the sqlite crowdfunding hasn't been implemented, 3month going on to 3 years. Hermann asks for a few more things to be sorted in the html5 that would make the product better - everything seems to have stopped (other than bug fixes and regressions) to get LC for fm out and it's still in beta.- I hope they release some of the goodness from that soon - maybe data binding? Lagi Open language anyone? On Sun, 9 Jun 2019 at 15:54, Tom Glod via use-livecode < use-livecode@lists.runrev.com> wrote: > Maybe LC wanted to become a platform for games, thats why they planned > this.. but then the market just didn't agree and they had to scrap it. > > Every company should strive to hit 100% of their promises, but sometimes > for the sake of the company striving, some have to be abandoned. > > Creating a platform is challenging because you have to respond to the > market of users, or you become useless. > > I don't see a lot of people asking for 2d physics. > > > > > > > > > On Sun, Jun 9, 2019 at 5:35 AM Richmond via use-livecode < > use-livecode@lists.runrev.com> wrote: > > > Box2D > > > > > > > https://www.kickstarter.com/projects/1755283828/open-source-edition-of-livecode/posts/415346 > > > > Promises > > > > Fundraisers > > > > Trust > > > > Physics Engine > > > > Babble, babble, babble . . . > > > > Richmond. > > > > ___ > > use-livecode mailing list > > use-livecode@lists.runrev.com > > Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your > > subscription preferences: > > http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode > > > ___ > use-livecode mailing list > use-livecode@lists.runrev.com > Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your > subscription preferences: > http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode > ___ use-livecode mailing list use-livecode@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
Re: Box2D
Just as well they didn’t waste their time or money on Windows 8 phone themes etc. Hehe. Sean Cole Pi Digital Prod Ltd > On 9 Jun 2019, at 15:54, Tom Glod via use-livecode > wrote: > > Maybe LC wanted to become a platform for games, thats why they planned > this.. but then the market just didn't agree and they had to scrap it. > > Every company should strive to hit 100% of their promises, but sometimes > for the sake of the company striving, some have to be abandoned. > > Creating a platform is challenging because you have to respond to the > market of users, or you become useless. > > I don't see a lot of people asking for 2d physics. > > > > > > > > > On Sun, Jun 9, 2019 at 5:35 AM Richmond via use-livecode < > use-livecode@lists.runrev.com> wrote: > >> Box2D >> >> >> https://www.kickstarter.com/projects/1755283828/open-source-edition-of-livecode/posts/415346 >> >> Promises >> >> Fundraisers >> >> Trust >> >> Physics Engine >> >> Babble, babble, babble . . . >> >> Richmond. >> >> ___ >> use-livecode mailing list >> use-livecode@lists.runrev.com >> Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your >> subscription preferences: >> http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode >> > ___ > use-livecode mailing list > use-livecode@lists.runrev.com > Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription > preferences: > http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode ___ use-livecode mailing list use-livecode@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
Re: Box2D
Maybe LC wanted to become a platform for games, thats why they planned this.. but then the market just didn't agree and they had to scrap it. Every company should strive to hit 100% of their promises, but sometimes for the sake of the company striving, some have to be abandoned. Creating a platform is challenging because you have to respond to the market of users, or you become useless. I don't see a lot of people asking for 2d physics. On Sun, Jun 9, 2019 at 5:35 AM Richmond via use-livecode < use-livecode@lists.runrev.com> wrote: > Box2D > > > https://www.kickstarter.com/projects/1755283828/open-source-edition-of-livecode/posts/415346 > > Promises > > Fundraisers > > Trust > > Physics Engine > > Babble, babble, babble . . . > > Richmond. > > ___ > use-livecode mailing list > use-livecode@lists.runrev.com > Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your > subscription preferences: > http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode > ___ use-livecode mailing list use-livecode@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
Re: Big problems creating standalone
On 6/9/2019 9:28 AM, Klaus major-k via use-livecode wrote: Hi friends, I have an old stack with 18 substacks from 2012. I saved it in current format with LC 9.04 on macOS 10.14.5. I selected 64bit in the standalone application settings and tried to create a standalone, but had to cancel (CMD+. period did not work I had to quit with CMD+Q) LC, which worked without problems!? It "hung" at, see also below: Removing development properties and setting profile options... for about 20 minutes before I quit. I had checked "Remove all profiles on objects". Then I applied the new "standalone fix" to the two appropriate handlers in my stack: on preopenstack if the environment = "development" and there is a stack "revStandaloneProgress" and the mode of stack "revStandaloneProgress" > 0 then exit preopenstack end if ... And: on openstack if the environment = "development" and there is a stack "revStandaloneProgress" and the mode of stack "revStandaloneProgress" > 0 then exit openstack end if ... I don't have any closestack, closecard or pre-/opencard handlers in the scripts. But now I get a long errorlist starting with: There was an error while saving the standalone application 91,1764,1 77,1764,1 449,1764,1 535,1764,1 353,0,0,stack "path to.../../../revsaveasstandalone.livecodescript" ... !? The line in question 1764 of that stack is in fact a COMMENT in handler: private command revSetStackProps pStack ... lock screen lock messages revStandaloneProgress "Removing development properties and setting profile options..." set the wholeMatches to true ## This is line 1764: --remove profiles from all objects if sStandaloneSettingsA["setToProfile"] is not "" then put true into tSetTo -- stack properties ... And 91 means "Stack not found"? WTF? What stack? Is this a bug? Any hints highly appreciated, thanks a lot in advance! I too have run into standalone building errors where there was a dump of triplet numbers trying to built a complex app originally built under LC5.5.x in 904 or 905rc1, but as we have been able to build in 904 on a different computer (in ourcase it was building for OSX under Windows that through the errors, but building for OSX under OSX worked) we've just moved on and have not troubleshot the problem further. Just not enough time. So I can't say if it was the same error or not. ___ use-livecode mailing list use-livecode@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
Big problems creating standalone
Hi friends, I have an old stack with 18 substacks from 2012. I saved it in current format with LC 9.04 on macOS 10.14.5. I selected 64bit in the standalone application settings and tried to create a standalone, but had to cancel (CMD+. period did not work I had to quit with CMD+Q) LC, which worked without problems!? It "hung" at, see also below: Removing development properties and setting profile options... for about 20 minutes before I quit. I had checked "Remove all profiles on objects". Then I applied the new "standalone fix" to the two appropriate handlers in my stack: on preopenstack if the environment = "development" and there is a stack "revStandaloneProgress" and the mode of stack "revStandaloneProgress" > 0 then exit preopenstack end if ... And: on openstack if the environment = "development" and there is a stack "revStandaloneProgress" and the mode of stack "revStandaloneProgress" > 0 then exit openstack end if ... I don't have any closestack, closecard or pre-/opencard handlers in the scripts. But now I get a long errorlist starting with: There was an error while saving the standalone application 91,1764,1 77,1764,1 449,1764,1 535,1764,1 353,0,0,stack "path to.../../../revsaveasstandalone.livecodescript" ... !? The line in question 1764 of that stack is in fact a COMMENT in handler: private command revSetStackProps pStack ... lock screen lock messages revStandaloneProgress "Removing development properties and setting profile options..." set the wholeMatches to true ## This is line 1764: --remove profiles from all objects if sStandaloneSettingsA["setToProfile"] is not "" then put true into tSetTo -- stack properties ... And 91 means "Stack not found"? WTF? What stack? Is this a bug? Any hints highly appreciated, thanks a lot in advance! Best Klaus -- Klaus Major http://www.major-k.de kl...@major-k.de ___ use-livecode mailing list use-livecode@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
Box2D
Box2D https://www.kickstarter.com/projects/1755283828/open-source-edition-of-livecode/posts/415346 Promises Fundraisers Trust Physics Engine Babble, babble, babble . . . Richmond. ___ use-livecode mailing list use-livecode@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
