Re: MacOS on M1: forcing universal app to open using rosetta from terminal?

Maybe this is of help for you. https://medium.com/swlh/run-x86-terminal-apps-like-homebrew-on-your-new-m1-mac-73bdc9b0f343 Regards, Matthias > Am 07.06.2022 um 00:01 schrieb Ben Rubinstein via

MacOS on M1: forcing universal app to open using rosetta from terminal?

Not strictly speaking a LiveCode question, but... I've resolved what I thought was possibly an LC confusion as my misunderstanding. With a universal app on an M1 Mac, you can set a checkbox in the "Get Info" properties inspector of the app to "Open using Rosetta". But this checkbox only

Re: Limit on the number of parameters?

Thanks Phil. I checked in the debugger both the call to the function where the 5th value was passed as a literal, and in the function itself where the parameter was no defined. It may be something with the SE debugger I'll look into it. Bob S > On Jun 6, 2022, at 13:00 , Phil Davis via

Re: Limit on the number of parameters?

In LC 9.6.7, this works in a button script: on mouseUp     tryThis "1", "2", "3", "4", "5", "66", "777", "", "9", "10" end mouseUp command tryThis     put the params -- the handler name and all 10 params are there end tryThis I often stuff lots of data items into an

Limit on the number of parameters?

Is the number of parameters passed to a custom handler limited to 4? I do not seem to be getting a 5th parameter to pass to a function I use. Bob S ___ use-livecode mailing list use-livecode@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe,

Re: Reporting Apple Silicon anomalies (Re: [[ ANN ]] Release 9.6.8 RC-1)

On 2022-06-06 15:50, Ben Rubinstein via use-livecode wrote: This is very exciting, thank you. If we find anomalies in the Apple Silicon side, should we raise them in the first instance - to you directly? - on this list? - straight into LQCC? Just file a bug in the LQCC - indicating that the

Reporting Apple Silicon anomalies (Re: [[ ANN ]] Release 9.6.8 RC-1)

Hi Panos, This is very exciting, thank you. If we find anomalies in the Apple Silicon side, should we raise them in the first instance - to you directly? - on this list? - straight into LQCC? thanks, Ben On 31/05/2022 16:27, panagiotis merakos via use-livecode wrote: Dear list members,

Re: char as word boundary

Apart from omitting the “of” in any of your posted lines of code, I am confused.. The number of chars of any string of concatenated “numToChar” functions will be the number of those functions, that is, 5, since each returns a single character. How did you get any of the other results? Craig