I take you Wha? and raise to Uh?
I'm in the process of creating my first BIG multi x multi dimenionsal
array stack and it's built exclusively on creating, modifying and
deleting array elements by passing the required info to and from
handlers as paramaters. It's all working brilliantly at the mome
On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 8:10 AM, Peter Haworth wrote:
> No, and as in my earlier email when the handler that i causes the problem
> is called from elsewhere in my stack, it works without a problem. I can't
> hard wire the numbers because they are passed in as parameters to the
> handler.
Sorry
Have your modified your delete handler in the last couple of days?
Have you modified the handler the Debugger points to in the last couple of days?
If you were to create a new button (or in the msg box) put:
repeat with x = 2 to 22
delete local tArray[x]
end repeat
does it still hang? If not,
Actually I just went with the simple example from the dictionary:
on closeField
if (the text of me is not an integer) then
answer "Please enter only whole numbers!" titled "Enter A Number"
select the text of me
end if
end closeField
Still, I do not understand why the IDE is beha
Jacque,
Actuallly this doesn't work for me either. LC locks up, my CPUs go to
100% and I don't even get a recursion message or anything. I have to
Force Quit LC.
Any further suggestions?
On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 11:43 AM, J. Landman Gay
wrote:
> on hCheckEntry pData
> repeat until pData is an
On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 11:43 AM, J. Landman Gay
wrote:
>
> Mostly what I wanted to say is that usually I avoid the whole issue like
> this:
>
> on hCheckEntry pData
> repeat until pData is an integer
>
> ask warning "Please enter only whole numbers!" with pData \
>titled "Enter A Nu
What is wrong with this Script logic?
I've been staring at this too long and can't figure out what's wrong.
1) New Main Stack
2) Add 1 plain field
3) Set the flds Script to:
on closeField
hCheckEntry me
end closeField
on hCheckEntry pData
if (pData is not an integer) then
ask warning "Pleas
On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 6:17 PM, BNig wrote:
> If you set the margins of the scrolling list field to 0,8,0,8
Nice! Peter should be very happy with that.
___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsu
Pete,
How far are you prepared to kludge this?
Set the margin for the field to 0
Under Basic Properties unclick 'fixedLineHeight' and set the
'firstIndent' to 4 (or something you like).
Now the part that gets ugly:
For the content of your field insert in the line before your content a
` charact
On Sun, Jan 6, 2013 at 9:02 AM, David C. wrote:
>I sure would like to find the cause just to save my
> sanity. :)
Like other's, scratching at straws.
To me it first sounded like you must have been opening LC by double
clicking a stack, this then opens the App associated with it. If LC
was bad, a
On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 2:16 AM, Todd Geist wrote:
> I found Trevor's FilesAndFolders library, and he has a fileGetInfo function
> in there. Thanks Trevor, but wow, thats a lot of work to get the file
> Properties.
Couldn't find Trevor's FilesAndFolders so not sure how complex it is,
but in line
[Sent again because the first one was too long - too many previous
posts included I guess]
Peter H, Richmond, and anyone else on Mac looking for a stepping stone
into grep, regex and Unix command line tools,
whilst nothing Peter A said was wrong, unless you are only doing
something very minor wit
I'm not exactly sure but having 'break' statements inside IF THEN END IF
seems wrong to me. When you get to the 'break' statement the code
immediately jumps to the 'end switch' statement, completely bypassing the
'end if'. I would think the engine is then still looking for the 'end if'
and not find
Read the LC Dictionary entry for matchText. Regex IS already implemented in
LC, if you care to use it. More importantly to you, as the dictionary
states, it is PCRE library compatible, which to me means it is OS agnostic.
All you need to do is learn the syntax (admittedly not trivial for some of
t
>From my own experience; if you are trying to parse ANY SQL statement that
someone might enter, then NO, regex alone is not going to be your solution.
If on the other hand you are dealing with a relatively small subset of SQL
statements, maybe SELECT, UPDATE, DELETE, then regex would be able to ver
I appreciate not the answer you are looking for, but with such a small set,
why not just build it dynamically and have the second option listed along
with the first:
AC/DC - High Voltage
AC/DC - TNT
Lou Reed
Ry Cooder
The Beatles - Abbey Road
The Beatles - Hard Days Night
The Beatles - Rubber Soul
I don't remember such a feature but I get something like it. I just place a
heap of blank lines between Handlers, I use 7-10, you might need 20. When I
click on the Handler's name in the left hand column, if it is relatively
small, I can see the whole Handler but neither the one above or below. Eve
On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 12:28 PM, J. Landman Gay
wrote:
> On 12/17/12 9:53 PM, Kay C Lan wrote:
>
> except it only lists one line even if there are multiple
>> entries, and it doesn't have 3 words before and after.
>>
>
> The 1-line entry is an ancient bug. Resize
On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 7:54 AM, Peter Bogdanoff wrote:
> I do see that there is much more management with the "offset", however, I
> believe I can use the offset without having to actually navigate to the
> other stack, and I found that going to another stack and using the "Find"
> there unlocks
Unless you have some other compelling reason to upgrade you are probably
better off sticking with SnoLeo.
I've just posted about my own upgrade experience - [OT] MoLi Upgrade - Long
and Boring Post
Which may help you decide, but because it's so long I'll just cut to the
chase:
Summary
MoLi woul
So finally took the plunge and took the weekend (14+ hr each day) to
upgrade my MBP to MoLi. Rather than just upgrade I took the
opportunity to do a clean install, so started with a virgin copy of
SnoLeo, upgraded direct to MoLi, then reinstalled all my apps and
data. To add a further level of diff
On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 7:53 AM, Alex Tweedly wrote:
>
> Any or all feedback welcome.
>
> I notice that if I use -- as the Remarks delimiter everything is fine, but
if I use
/*
The purpose of this handler is...
...
*/
These Remarks are caught by your plugin as a custom prop.
_
On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 10:20 AM, Robert Sneidar wrote:
> I find frustration is my worst enemy when trying to debug a difficult bit
> of code. Taking a deep breath and going about things systematically helps
> me a lot.
>
> Absolutely. Whether explicitVars is Off or On, typos are the least of my
Ah, so that's what happened to the pigeon with the back-up written order.
The first and last designators (OKAKN) simply indicate the beginning and
the end of the message. It was a way of ensuring entire messages were
received. The 27 is the character count, including the start and stop
indicators
I know everyone has their preference, and at the moment I'm trying to ween
myself onto explicitVars for a big project, but I have never understood the
argument that you can't *see* these spelling errors. As soon as a script
doesn't behave, in goes a breakpoint, and you stop inside the script and
'i
Although there is a Zoom feature in Universal Access, even when it's turned
Off there is a Screen Zoom feature which can be used. Screen Zoom is
available with any trackpad or if you have a Magic Mouse, Mighty Mouse or
mouse with a scroll wheel. Press *Ctrl + Scroll UP (two finger if using a
trackp
On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 2:55 AM, Richard Gaskin
wrote:
> I think the 6.0 "Preview" is only available to members of the Developer
> Program, but I'm not sure how that could be dependent on the Linux
> deployment option.
>
> Yes, I believe that too, and would therefore make you fall under the NDA
ot
Richard penned the below quite some time ago, but it's still clear as mud
to me.
I just got an email offering me:
Our offer to you*: Get any update to your LiveCode license today, and we'll
give you:
Access to the LiveCode Developer Program
All developer preview releases of 6.0
And a
On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 10:09 PM, FlexibleLearning.com <
ad...@flexiblelearning.com> wrote:
> Any pointers to how to stop this damn dialog would be most welcome!
>
I eventually learnt to out smart the dialog by a preemptive cmd-s. It's
doing what LC wants you to do without being told.
Probably n
On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 9:31 AM, Mark Wieder wrote:
>
> I think that's covered under fair use as derivative art.
>
> Which of course is one of the central tenets of copyright. Most people
confuse copyright and think it's a means of preventing material from being
copied, when in fact it is the bas
On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 1:02 AM, Bob Sneidar wrote:
> I came across this article, and thought to myself that the whole notion
> about "licensing to use" vs. "buying to own" can go completely sideways if
> we don't apply some real common sense to the issue.
>
> Sideways? I'm actually surprised tha
On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 5:47 AM, Bob Sneidar wrote:
> Face it Richmond. It's you and me against the world. ;-)
If you can't sleep at night because you're worried about multiple lock
screen, or keeping track of pairs, why not:
if the lockScreen is false then lock screen
If you only ever use th
During development a useful couple of lines of code are, assuming you've
been through your repeat for each col_name loop to create your query with
it's many OR conditions:
put tQuery into tTemp
replace comma with cr in tTemp
replace " OR " with cr & " OR " in tTemp
--replace " AND " with cr & " AN
I'll take that back. Most Functions that have multi-line entries seem to
have been concatenated.
On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 2:02 PM, Kay C Lan wrote:
> OK, for base64Decode I see that, but for many others, like 'switch' I see
> multiple lines all nicely spaced.
>
>
>
Decode of *encodedData*base64Decode(*encodedData*)
>
> 1 line smooshed together. All the functions that list both methods of usage
> (the base64decode, base64decode())
>
> Anyone else seeing this?
>
> On Sun, Sep 16, 2012 at 7:47 PM, Kay C Lan
> wrote:
>
> > Not see that
Not see that here with LC 5.5.2 Build 1492 on SnoLeo.
On Sun, Sep 16, 2012 at 10:21 PM, Mike Bonner wrote:
> There is a dictionary bug in 5.5.2 where the lines of the syntax section of
> a page all run together. I've sent a note to runrev but was wondering if
> anyone might have a quicky fix fo
What happens if you use the Stacks window of the Standalone Applications
Setting window?
___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription
preferences:
http://lists.ru
On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 3:07 AM, Jim Hurley wrote:
> But I have one more very sophisticated diagnostic test I perform. I
> listen. Every so often, the HD on my Mac Mini squeaks for a few minutes.
> That can't be good.
>
Are you sure it's the HD, that would be very very unusual. What about the
fa
On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 1:09 AM, Paul Hibbert wrote:
>
> I'm also pretty sure you can install a copy of your OS on a USB memory
> stick, you may need a reasonable size stick, but they are not too expensive
> now and it should help you determine where the error lies, you'll also see
> how fast the
On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 1:10 PM, stephen barncard <
stephenrevoluti...@barncard.com> wrote:
> Scott, I had something like this - and it turned out to be a half working
> hard drive.
>
You could use xBench http://xbench.com/ if you don't have Drive Genius to
test your HD speeds. Should be fairly o
On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 12:02 PM, Scott Rossi wrote:
> The one thing I found online is that the Spotlight
> indexing process can sometimes go crazy and intermittently bog down the
> processor -- Onyx supposedly allows you to disable this but I'm not certain
> this is the problem (not a regular cul
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 11:12 PM, Richmond wrote:
> The other day I was pruning fruit trees in our garden in our country villa
> here in Bulgaria,
> using a ladder I bought (logically enough) in a B & Q store in Dundee,
> Scotland. I noticed there was
> a sticker attached to it that said "not reco
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 11:22 PM, Peter Alcibiades <
palcibiades-fi...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
> I think the restriction on use is fine, because its just a product feature.
> Rev is perfectly entitled to have whatever features it wants.
>
So it would then be perfectly reasonable for Apple to leave th
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 9:24 PM, Richard Gaskin
wrote:
>
> That's one question, and it may be interesting to see how it plays out if
> Apple ever enforces the "Apple branded hardware" clause in their EULA.
>
> Why is it assumed that Apple must be the one to go to court to enforce
it's rule.
If th
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 8:59 PM, Peter Alcibiades <
palcibiades-fi...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
>
> What is needed is an EU case in which either running the thing in a VM or
> on
> the wrong sort of hardware was ruled breach of contract and some kind of
> ruling made. I don't know of one. Maybe someon
On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 5:50 PM, Richmond wrote:
> 6. One of the real problems (and it is more philosophical than either
> legal or moral) is what
> constitutes possession.
>
> 6.1. I have a Snow Leopard install disk on the desk next to me as I type
> this, and its contents
>(i.e. the
On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 11:15 AM, Roger Eller
wrote:
> There are car stereos that have a record button just like the cassette
> recorders of the past. Is it dishonest to press record and get a
> less-than-perfect mp3 recording that is perfectly acceptable to the
> listener (for free)? I don't th
Lets be thankful Revolution has progressed to LiveCode. I don't think I
skinned any cats with 1.1.
On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 12:49 AM, Bob Sneidar wrote:
> Let us be thankful that most of us live in a place unlike Africa, where
> the cats can skin us!
>
> On Sep 9, 2012, at 5:14 PM, Dr. Hawkins wr
On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 2:42 AM, Peter Haworth wrote:
> You're right, yes I'm referring to the parts about running only on Apple
> hardware.
> Pete
>
What you are saying then is Apple can't even say there is minimum system
requirement for their OS.
There are many people who are very unhappy wit
On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 1:40 AM, J. Landman Gay wrote:
> By retaining control of both software and hardware, it "just works" -- at
> least, most of the time.
>
I think this is it in a nutshell. Although Apple has definitely used the
'underdog' tag, from my reading of the 'Steve Jobs' book, if I
ou and
the suggested 'send ... as applescript' might be a better way to go. I'm
guessing the reason the suggested methods aren't working is that an OSAX is
probably needed.
HTH
On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 8:52 AM, Kay C Lan wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 12:42 AM, wrote:
>
On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 12:42 AM, wrote:
> Something to do with the pathname? Such a message has no issue in HC
> (running OS9, of course)
>
>
My guess is yes, that is an OS 9/HC pathname. LC uses / not : in it's
pathnames.
HTH
___
use-livecode mailing
Good point Mark.
Looking at my Snow Leopard EULA (as it differs from current EULAs) it says:
1 General. The software... are licensed, not sold, to you... You own the
media on which the Apple Software is recorded...
So I guess Richmond you are free to use the DVD for lighting a fire,
throwing at
And people complain that Apple is a walled garden. I've never had that
happen with any Apple products.
As Peter said, unless you live in the State of California, then this
portion of the EULA would apply:
i. The laws of the State of California, excluding its conflicts of law
rules, govern this li
Ben,
Thanks for the pointer. No I certainly didn't know about the Breakpoint tab
- well for some strange reason it doesn't do anything for hard coded
breakpoints, when I click on the Tab it comes up empty so I guess I've
occasionally clicked on it and have come away assuming it's telling me
nothin
On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 9:31 AM, J. Landman Gay wrote:
>
> One thing I like a lot about the red dots is that you can remove all of
> them from all scripts with a single menu item selection "Clear all
> breakpoints". Very handy.
>
If I want to test my scripts without ANY breakpoints I simply turn O
On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 12:14 AM, Peter Haworth wrote:
> I'm surprised by the number of problems people are reporting with the
> debugger.
>
Since using 'breakpoint' exclusively I've not experienced any problems with
the debugger; but then again I don't think I've ever used mouseLine or
mouseChar
But this doesn't
on mouseUp
answer "Press cmd+e for Blue, cmd+k for Black or cmd+n for Brown or
cmd+c for Cancel" with "Blue" or "Black" or "Brown" or "Cancel" as sheet
put it into fld "Field4"
end mouseUp
It would appear that you are limited to the first letter of the button and
therefore
On Mon, Sep 3, 2012 at 3:17 AM, Timothy Miller <
gand...@doctortimothymiller.com> wrote:
>
> My 24 year old son has a normal conscience ... His conscience is entirely
> silent on these topics. He thinks I'm weird because I prefer to pay for the
> music I listen to.
>
> Oh, then he could join the F
On Sun, Sep 2, 2012 at 4:45 AM, Richmond wrote:
>
> Would anyone like to hear why somebody who doesn't know when and how
> to keep his mouth shut and his opinions to himself is running a
> hole-in-the-wall EFL
> school in a country "at the bottom of the sack" when he could have been
> something 'g
On Sun, Sep 2, 2012 at 1:24 AM, Dr. Hawkins wrote:
>
> If I don't have the breakpoint, but instead reddot the "if isdna", the
> breakpoint is ignored.
>
IMO the red dots are like the Geometry Manager - to be avoided because they
are flaky. I've never had the debugger ignore a specifically writte
On Sat, Sep 1, 2012 at 1:26 AM, Colin Holgate wrote:
> I'll report it to the publisher (though I doubt they'll have the power to
> do much about it)
>
Unfortunately they are probably the cause.
My guess is the hard copies of the book were printed in China, in which
case the digital copy that wa
I wander what we would have if we took Leopard and added every feature a
young freckled FaceBook late Tweeter, early thirties, head always in the
iCloud impatiently expecting everything to be delivered to them on a pdf
having automatically started itself, run itself, Googling them the Wiki
link to
On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 11:50 AM, J. Landman Gay
wrote:
>
> It's not what you're looking for (which would be great, I agree) but on
> desperate occasions I have opened two stacks as text files in BBEdit and
> run "find differences" on them.
>
Yep, when I know it's just script changes I'm looking
On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 8:57 AM, Mark Wieder wrote:
>
> I have, several times. It's on my list of bacon-saving devices.
>
Yes, and on my list as well, along with TimeMachine and Carbon Copy Cloner.
But my comments were more a reflection of how complex, laborious and space
wasting the current si
As I've followed this thread I've thought what an absolutely marvellous
concept; the ability to Undo, not just multiple times, but even past
previous saves! And not just script changes, but entire Object property
states. But what about an even better feature, the ability to Undo past
actual instanc
On Sun, Aug 5, 2012 at 11:27 AM, Kay C Lan wrote:
> put quote & "Sum" & quote into word 8 of tSummaryFldName
> -- field "Sum" of card "Sum" of stack "Sum"
>
> Whoops, a gotcha, if you need to refer to a substack of a mainstack then
On Sun, Aug 5, 2012 at 10:46 AM, Peter M. Brigham wrote:
>
> The real usefulness of the long name of a control (or card, or stack) is
> that it is in itself a complete object reference. So:
>
> put the long name of fle "xxx" into tFldRef
> put "Let's put something in to field xxx" into tFldRef
>
On Sun, Aug 5, 2012 at 6:37 AM, Dr. Hawkins wrote:
>
> In several places, the names of the fields are actually being
> constructed by string manipulation (e.g., val_sbt comes from [ fldNam
> & "_sbt" ], and then I want to add the $123.45 in val (or possibly
> fld fal) to the $852.87 already in f
On Fri, Aug 3, 2012 at 9:14 AM, Dr. Hawkins
> Just to be clear here, it's not the mechanics of getting it there, but
> rather the content format of the message.
>
I believe the tricks are:
1) send the parameters as long names
2) you then have to use 'the text of' to get the numbers
3) you then n
I've just received my LC Academy Super Bundle DVD and popped it in and
viewed a few episodes. Brilliant.
I'm just wondering about the 'updateScreen' message which is mentioned in
Lesson 1 of the Game Academy; this was recorded before Christmas 2011 and
it's stated that it will be incorporated into
OK, I'll keep it until I do the skip from SL to ML.
On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 8:20 PM, Andre Garzia wrote:
>
> No I am on Lion. I though it would run on Snow Leopard but it appears this
> is not the case.
>
>
___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@li
On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 6:51 AM, Andre Garzia wrote:
>
> 1 - It makes life easier for those using versions older than Lion. Bundled
> psql is 8.4 and this is 9.1 and you can't really update the bundled version
> because there is no package manager.
>
> Thanks for posting the link Andre, but when
Man, I'm on the road a couple of days, get diverted to JFK because of some
'crisis' - it's always a crisis with my company and it always 'you're the
only one available to do it' - and just now I get a chance to down tools
and crack open the laptop and check some emails and I discover some of the
LC
On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 3:26 AM, Richard Gaskin
wrote:
>
> What's new is that your app doesn't "write" there per se. Apple is now
> requiring that the OS write there on your behalf, using either the
> theNSUserDefaults Cocoa class or the CFPreferences API.
>
> At face value this seems silly, sinc
Sorry, this:
put the number of flds of this stack into tMax
should have read:
put the number of flds of this CARD into tMax
I have become too accustomed to using single card stacks.
On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 9:07 AM, Kay C Lan wrote:
> This should get you headed in the right direction
>
This should get you headed in the right direction
In normal fields:
on closeField
goNextUseableField the number of me
end closeField
on exitField
goNextUseableField the number of me
end exitField
In the Card Script: (watch for line wraps)
on goNextUseableField pNum
put the number of f
William,
This is very easy to achieve, in the card script, on openCard you can
simply,
lock screen
set the height of stack "my stack" to 3456
set the width of stack "my stack" to 2345
This will override the automatic resizing that goes on. This does have it's
problems though as it may push the m
If you would like to test you own set up you can use the following:
I created a new stack "Untitled 1" and placed a button in it with this
script:
(watch for line wraps)
on mouseUp
put "ScreenRect: " & the screenRect into tRec
put item 4 of the screenRect into tScrnHt
put item 3 of the s
William, after some extensive testing of Lion, I conclude that Lion behaves
better than Snow Leopard in regard to the available size a stack can take
up. I can only surmise that when you upgraded to Lion your Dock settings
changed, in particular the default size prior to any magnification effect.
Klaus,
Thanks so much, I knew it had to be easy in LC :-))
On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 12:11 AM, Klaus on-rev wrote:
>
> this does work, just tested :-)
> OS X 10.7.4, Safari 5.1.7, LC 5.5
>
> > put the dragData["text"] into tStore3
> > ##-I get the file name '
> > ##http://www.emma-maersk.com/galle
"Steve Cropper & Duck Dunn!, Steve Cropper & Duck Dunn!"
"Joliet" Jake Blues, Briefcase Full of Blues, Track 9 - Soul Man
Sadly, Duck Dunn passed away just a month ago. RIP.
___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this u
On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 1:07 PM, Kay C Lan wrote:
>
> So my guess is that LC takes the working screenRect and reduces your stack
> by 86 pixels.
>
> Whoops, bad math, that should read 84 pixels.
___
use-livecode mailing li
On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 10:23 AM, Igor de Oliveira Couto
> I can confirm, that I do get quite a large difference - over 70. That,
> however, does not seem to be a bug, but rather due to the fact that the
> 'working screenRect' on MacOS X takes into consideration not only the space
> taken by the m
William,
I see your QCC report is unconfirmed. What you need is people here to do a
quick test - sorry I am not at home to test this on my wife's Lion Mac.
Anyone with Lion simply needs to type in the msg box: put the working
screenrect
They should get something back like: 0,22,1920,1196
They t
What Bob said but his caveat is easily handled.
I suggest when you create your list of data your DO NOT use comma or tab as
the itemDelimiter. I tend to use | or numToChar(127) - which is invisible.
If your data is going to contain remarks, or notes, as yours clearly is,
then it will contain comma
Tereza,
Curiosity got the better of me so I gave the Security command line + LC a
whirl and it was extremely easy.
After manually creating a dummy 'generic' account (not Internet, also
called application) in Keychain Access = dummyAcct, with Password =
password, I created a new main stack with on
Tereza,
If I remember correctly you are on Mac? If so there is a command line
option, cryptically called 'Security' you can use to store the password in
Keychain Access, and recover it, if need be.
This link (below) goes to an AppleScript site that uses this option. I send
you there rather than d
On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 7:27 AM, william humphrey wrote:
> This is the working screenrect for my mac os laptop pro 0,22,1440,830
>
The problem seems to be here, but not sure if it is LC or Lion.
You must have a MacBook Pro that has a screen resolution of 1440x900. On
SnoLeo the screenrect on my
On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 10:51 AM, Monte Goulding wrote:
>
> I think we found a bug. If you hold down shift and use the arrow keys the
> selectionChanged message is sent. If your just moving the cursor it isn't
> sent but it should be. Do you want to report it or me?
>
> I'm not sure that I fully u
Not yet, but I've noted your interest and Lynn's replies and whenever it
does become an option with on-rev it's something I'd certainly be
experimenting with.
Let's hope it's not too far away.
On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 9:46 PM, william humphrey wrote:
> Does anyone host a valentina server on the o
On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 10:37 PM, Ken Ray wrote:
> Not sure if that's still available for download, but if not, maybe RunRev
> could post it on RevOnline or on their site...
>
> Thanks Ken, I PM'd Heather to see if that would be possible.
___
use-livecod
I too would like to see if anyone has done some amazing things with the
new field features. My own work with them have been nothing more than
rudimentary tests.
___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscrib
On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 12:49 AM, Peter Haworth wrote:
> Personally, I'm a big fan of separating code and data so always use
> external storage for the data in my applications, be it a flat file or a
> database. However, that entails learning how to access files efficiently
> and/or learning SQL
On Sat, Jun 2, 2012 at 10:52 PM, Richard Gaskin
wrote:
> The drafting table orientation has been optimal for long work sessions for
> centuries, so it seems inevitable that as computer form factors continue to
> diversify we'll see an increasing number of those.
>
> An iMac that tilts all the way
What a great write up, congrats Runrev Team.
In light of the other thread about HyperCard, the only thing that makes me
wince in the write-up is the multiple references to the stack/card metaphor.
Whilst a knowledge of the past is all well and good, for the rising
generation of potential programm
On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 4:48 PM, Richmond wrote:
>
> My younger son, who is at a private school in Germany informs me that all
> the kids there are buying
> new MacBooks with Lion installed; and, the first thing they do is blank
> the hard-drive and install Snow Leopard!
>
> I thought Apple had
On Sat, Jun 2, 2012 at 2:45 AM, Lynn Fredricks <
lfredri...@proactive-intl.com> wrote:
>
> Within each product line (Macs, iPod, iPhone, iPad) you have very clear and
> very simple differentiated levels - the low end is cheapest and sports
> fewer
> features,
>
Very interesting you should write t
On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 11:12 PM, Peter M. Brigham, MD wrote:
>
> First Class! Now that brings back memories! Is there a museum somewhere
> for dead software?
>
> What?? I still access the local Mac User Group via FirstClass 9.1 - not
that I would recommend it to anyone, there is certainly better o
On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 7:11 PM, Peter Alcibiades <
palcibiades-fi...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
>
> The dog in the manger approach was, we don't want it, we cannot use it (eat
> it) and so we will not let anyone else who could use it and make good
> things
> out of it have it either.
>
> You are certainl
701 - 800 of 916 matches
Mail list logo
