Re: Get URL anomaly

2018-03-06 Thread Bob Sneidar via use-livecode
Lately I've found that to be iffy. I just manually select what I know I need. Bob S > On Mar 6, 2018, at 06:56 , Graham Samuel via use-livecode > wrote: > > Hi Charles - thanks for your help. I immediately tried your modification (use > ‘put’ and avoid the

Re: Get URL anomaly

2018-03-06 Thread J. Landman Gay via use-livecode
On 3/6/18 4:08 PM, Graham Samuel via use-livecode wrote: since TSNet is an enforced presence on all commercial versions of LC, I wonder why libURL isn’t automatically included even in apps that don’t appear to be using internet access. That seems entirely reasonable, you might want to write

Re: Get URL anomaly

2018-03-06 Thread Graham Samuel via use-livecode
Thanks Jacque - since TSNet is an enforced presence on all commercial versions of LC, I wonder why libURL isn’t automatically included even in apps that don’t appear to be using internet access. It’s a gotcha that is likely to bother people apart from me, IMHO. Maybe ‘search for inclusions’

Re: Get URL anomaly

2018-03-06 Thread J. Landman Gay via use-livecode
On 3/6/18 8:56 AM, Graham Samuel via use-livecode wrote: I was relying on the Standalone Application Settings option ’search for required inclusions’. I always use manual inclusions for that reason. As soon as I add a feature to a project I also add it to the inclusions so I won't forget.

Re: Get URL anomaly

2018-03-06 Thread Graham Samuel via use-livecode
Hi Charles - thanks for your help. I immediately tried your modification (use ‘put’ and avoid the variable ‘it’) but it made no difference. However, I think I have solved the problem: I was relying on the Standalone Application Settings option ’search for required inclusions’. This did

Re: Get URL anomaly

2018-03-05 Thread Charles Warwick via use-livecode
Hi Graham, > On 5 Mar 2018, at 10:56 pm, Graham Samuel via use-livecode > wrote: > > As in some of my previous mails, I’m talking about having to retrieve a tiny > text file from a server (and later put a modified version of it back, but > let’s get one