Dear List Members,
Sometimes we make a joke of this, but it is essential to the useful
operation of this list that *everyone* on the list respects the rules,
which have been imposed for very good reason. Clearly you are all
aware of the no politics and religion rule, but some of you may
Hi Doug. I just sent this to a use list in response to someone who remarked
that no current scientific viewpoint considers such an extreme point of view
like Creation to be valid. I thought you might enjoy it. :-)
Bob
Hi all.
Actually I find ALL views on the subject extreme. Let's have a
On 1/24/11 2:27 PM, Bob Sneidar wrote:
Actually I find ALL views on the subject extreme. Let's have a brief
rundown on what we know so far:
Oh, let's not.
--
Jacqueline Landman Gay | jac...@hyperactivesw.com
HyperActive Software | http://www.hyperactivesw.com
Then let's refrain from calling other views extreme and saying that they are
unacceptable by all reputable scientists everywhere, okay?
Thanks
On Jan 24, 2011, at 12:58 PM, J. Landman Gay wrote:
On 1/24/11 2:27 PM, Bob Sneidar wrote:
Actually I find ALL views on the subject extreme. Let's
On 24 Jan 2011, at 21:27, Bob Sneidar wrote:
blah blah wank blah wank wank blah
I disagree, and you can't make me agree to your drivel by replying to this.
have fun
Bjoernke
--
official ChatRev page:
http://bjoernke.com?target=chatrev
Chat with other RunRev developers:
go stack URL
On 25 Jan 2011, at 00:27, Bob Sneidar wrote:
I wouldn't think of it. :-) I enjoyed your well thought out rebuttal though.
;-)
Bob
I rebutted nothing. Mostly because you have no argument, and this is not the
space, so please be reminded to not reply here.
--
official ChatRev page:
Recently, Björnke von Gierke wrote:
I wouldn't think of it. :-) I enjoyed your well thought out rebuttal though.
;-)
Bob
I rebutted nothing. Mostly because you have no argument, and this is not the
space, so please be reminded to not reply here.
May I suggest that stating Bob has no
