Re: Can't seem to build standalone in LC9.0.0

Panos wrote: > In the error msg I saw a reference to "openstack". In LC 9 (started in > RC-1 I *think*) we no longer lock messages when building a standalone. > This was necessary to fix other problems and it is mentioned in the > 9.0.0 Release Notes under the section "Breaking Changes". I'm

Re: Can't seem to build standalone in LC9.0.0

Panos: That fixed it. Hmm… It seems like there are a lot more interactions between the IDE and the project, though. I haven’t decided yet if this is a good thing, or if it doesn’t matter. Bill > On Apr 6, 2018, at 11:06 PM, panagiotis merakos via use-livecode >

Re: Can't seem to build standalone in LC9.0.0

Pianos, Thanks for the hint. I’m busy this morning, but will try your fix this afternoon and get back. Best, Bill William Prothero http://earthlearningsolutions.org > On Apr 6, 2018, at 11:06 PM, panagiotis merakos via use-livecode > wrote: > > Hi Bill, > > In

Re: Can't seem to build standalone in LC9.0.0

Hi Bill, In the error msg I saw a reference to "openstack". In LC 9 (started in RC-1 I *think*) we no longer lock messages when building a standalone. This was necessary to fix other problems and it is mentioned in the 9.0.0 Release Notes under the section "Breaking Changes". So I wild guess is

Re: Can't seem to build standalone in LC9.0.0

I can say it is more complicated than the number of LiveCode stacks though (just built a 3 stack app as a test). Any idea where in the 9 release cycle this became an issue? Someone that can parse the error screen that you captured should be able to provide a better clue to the problem (especially

Re: Can't seem to build standalone in LC9.0.0

Tom, I just captured the relevant dialogs and Windows on my Mac. Never owned a Commodore, but did write some machine language for a radio shack model 100 once in the distant past. I was sooo (naively) trusting of the perfection of lc9 that it took me way too long to try the build on lc8.2.

Re: Can't seem to build standalone in LC9.0.0

Glad you found a solution...I have to ask how did you get that commodore 64 look on your screens? It was awesome! :D :D: D please please try to report the bug and help the team find it. software is a hard hard problem. On Fri, Apr 6, 2018 at 8:59 PM, William Prothero via use-livecode

Re: Can't seem to build standalone in LC9.0.0

Found solution: Don’t use LC 9.0.0. When I add more than one “.livecode” stack in the “Stacks” list, I get the errors referred to in the original posting However, when I use LC 8.2.0 (DP 2), I get a standalone. No errors. I’ll see if I can make a sample stack and report this as a bug. Best, Bill

Re: Can't seem to build standalone in LC9.0.0

More info: When I only have a single “.livecode” stack and multiple “.livecodescript” stacks in the “Stacks” list, it makes a standalone, but with more than one (it doesn’t matter which one), “.livecode” stack, it fails. This is starting to seem like a bug. Bill > On Apr 6, 2018, at 4:59 PM,

Can't seem to build standalone in LC9.0.0

Folks: This has me extremely frustrated and I’ve spent way too many hours trying to get this to work. If anybody has a few minutes to look at the error dialogs in the link, I’d very much appreciate it. I’m probably missing something very obvious, but …. Link to zip of 3 screen shots that show