AW: Re: Codesigning standalones for Mac OS 10.9.5

2014-10-12 Thread Paul Dupuis
On 10/9/2014 8:25 PM, David Beck wrote: > Does anybody know what the status is with codesigning standalones built for > Mac OS in a way that works with OS 10.9.5? I have not been able to find a > definitive answer. I take it this article is out of date? > > http://revolution.screenstepslive.com/s/r

Re: AW: AW: AW: Codesigning standalones for Mac OS 10.9.5

2014-10-11 Thread Paul Dupuis
On 10/11/2014 6:34 AM, Tiemo Hollmann TB wrote: > Hello Paul, > The thing with signing on 10.8 and downloading again on 10.8. with this > message sounds really weired. Could it be by chance, that your certificate > is expired? > Just a guess > Tiemo Nope. Unfortunately, the "Security Update 2014-0

AW: AW: AW: Codesigning standalones for Mac OS 10.9.5

2014-10-11 Thread Tiemo Hollmann TB
om] Im Auftrag > von Paul Dupuis > Gesendet: Freitag, 10. Oktober 2014 19:17 > An: use-livecode@lists.runrev.com > Betreff: Re: AW: AW: Codesigning standalones for Mac OS 10.9.5 > > On 10/10/2014 11:33 AM, Tiemo Hollmann TB wrote: > > Hello Paul, > > > > I nev

AW: AW: AW: Codesigning standalones for Mac OS 10.9.5

2014-10-11 Thread Tiemo Hollmann TB
igning standalones for Mac OS 10.9.5 > > On 10/10/2014, 10:33 AM, Tiemo Hollmann TB wrote: > > I never got any answer, what a manifest file is. > > It's just a plist file that stores information about the app, like its name, > version number, compatible files, icon resource

Re: AW: AW: Codesigning standalones for Mac OS 10.9.5

2014-10-10 Thread J. Landman Gay
On 10/10/2014, 10:33 AM, Tiemo Hollmann TB wrote: I never got any answer, what a manifest file is. It's just a plist file that stores information about the app, like its name, version number, compatible files, icon resources, things like that. Finder uses plists to determine what documents an

Re: AW: AW: Codesigning standalones for Mac OS 10.9.5

2014-10-10 Thread Paul Dupuis
On 10/10/2014 11:33 AM, Tiemo Hollmann TB wrote: > Hello Paul, > > I never got any answer, what a manifest file is. Either nobody here knows > it, or it is so common knowledge, that it wasn't worth to answer. As far as > I know, it is a kind of preference file, but I don't know, for what > preferen

AW: AW: Codesigning standalones for Mac OS 10.9.5

2014-10-10 Thread Tiemo Hollmann TB
com] Im Auftrag > von Paul Dupuis > Gesendet: Freitag, 10. Oktober 2014 15:39 > An: use-livecode@lists.runrev.com > Betreff: Re: AW: Codesigning standalones for Mac OS 10.9.5 > > On 10/10/2014 5:39 AM, Tiemo Hollmann TB wrote: > > Hi David, > > you just have to remov

Re: AW: Codesigning standalones for Mac OS 10.9.5

2014-10-10 Thread Paul Dupuis
On 10/10/2014 5:39 AM, Tiemo Hollmann TB wrote: > Hi David, > you just have to remove all manifest files from all revbundels within your > app. Then codesigning works again on 10.9.5 as expected. > See also my post: "OT: what does a manifest file?" > Tiemo I never saw the answer to your post askin

AW: Codesigning standalones for Mac OS 10.9.5

2014-10-10 Thread Tiemo Hollmann TB
se-livecode-boun...@lists.runrev.com] Im Auftrag > von David Beck > Gesendet: Freitag, 10. Oktober 2014 02:25 > An: use-livecode@lists.runrev.com > Betreff: Codesigning standalones for Mac OS 10.9.5 > > Does anybody know what the status is with codesigning standalones built for > Mac OS in a

Re: Codesigning standalones for Mac OS 10.9.5

2014-10-09 Thread Paul Dupuis
On 10/9/2014 8:25 PM, David Beck wrote: > Does anybody know what the status is with codesigning standalones built for > Mac OS in a way that works with OS 10.9.5? I have not been able to find a > definitive answer. I take it this article is out of date? > > http://revolution.screenstepslive.com/s/r

Codesigning standalones for Mac OS 10.9.5

2014-10-09 Thread David Beck
Does anybody know what the status is with codesigning standalones built for Mac OS in a way that works with OS 10.9.5? I have not been able to find a definitive answer. I take it this article is out of date? http://revolution.screenstepslive.com/s/revolution/m/10695/l/112989 Has anybody had succe