To view the messages in threaded form I use:
http://lists.runrev.com/pipermail/use-livecode/
I can't reply thru that so when I do want to reply I use:
http://runtime-revolution.278305.n4.nabble.com/
I can't imagine trying to manage all the email from the lists in my mail. I
have enough to sort
Apple Mail does indeed support threading, but somehow certain emails or rather
replies to emails "unthread" and start a new thread. Part of the problem is
that some simply subscribe to the list as individual emails, while others
employ the digest, and still others use the forum (I think). The
Hi
Another way to approach it is to use the 'get the executionContext'. You
can get the filename of the script only stack from this
I tried this in a button with a behaviour script on a new stack with three
fields to see the different results.
on mouseUp pButtonNumber
set the itemdelimiter
Bob:
I tried it. Yes:
put the name of me —returns the name of the control that hosts the behavior
script
put the name of this me —returns the name of the behavior script
Best,
Bill
> On Jan 2, 2019, at 11:34 AM, Bob Sneidar via use-livecode
> wrote:
>
> Ah yes then, me refers to the object
On 1/2/19 8:01 AM, Bob Sneidar via use-livecode wrote:
And I replied before checking all my other emails. Seriously, at some point we
need to develop a list system where emails remain threaded. I have over 40 from
this list this morning, and reading through every one, then trying to go back
Ah yes then, me refers to the object the script belongs to. With behaviors, me
refers to the *instance* of the script which is "owned" by the object being
interacted with. "this me" refers to the actual behavior script. What you want
is "this me".
Bob S
> On Jan 2, 2019, at 08:35 ,
Bob,
Thanks for the response. You are probably right, the filename of me should
work. I don’t know whether it’s old age or not, but several times I have worked
on a problem until I felt I had exhausted my ideas, posted a question to this
list, then a solution immediately came to mind. If this
Doesn't "the filename of me" work?
Bob S
> On Dec 31, 2018, at 14:48 , William Prothero via use-livecode
> wrote:
>
> My question:
> How do I get the name of the script only stack that holds the “Feature” code?
> The above code gives me the name of the main stack, which is not useful for
And I replied before checking all my other emails. Seriously, at some point we
need to develop a list system where emails remain threaded. I have over 40 from
this list this morning, and reading through every one, then trying to go back
and respond is a little more brainwork than I am used to
I don't mean to sound flippant, but what is the question?
Bob S
> On Dec 31, 2018, at 14:38 , William Prothero via use-livecode
> wrote:
>
> Folks:
> I’m trying to implement a structure where I can simply add script only stacks
> that seamlessly add capability to my app. To do this, I have
Folks:
Ok, if there is a way to get the name of the stack containing a particular
handler, I’ll use it. Otherwise, each “feature” stack will return a precoded
name. I had to fiddle to get the polling to work without errors.
The impetus for this is to re-factor the code for a project that’s
Folks:
Sorry, I accidentally sent the email before finishing it. Here’s the complete
message.
But perhaps I’ve solved it. I only need to put the name of the “feature” stack
in the pollActions handler. Anyway, I still have my question.
I’m trying to implement a structure where I can simply add
Folks:
I’m trying to implement a structure where I can simply add script only stacks
that seamlessly add capability to my app. To do this, I have all of the
“feature” stacks in a given folder, and when I initialize the app, I start
using all of the “feature” stacks. Then I want to initialize
13 matches
Mail list logo
