Re: OT Re: Referencing Livecode

[Martin Koob via use-livecode]

Hi.

These are great examples of use cases for LiveCode and it is great how you 
explain the app design. It especially cool that the apps are used for citizen 
science.  It complements LiveCode's “anyone can code” tag line with the “any 
one can do science" ethic of citizen science.

Thanks Alan.

Martin Koob 

> On Jun 21, 2022, at 6:42 AM, David V Glasgow via use-livecode 
>  wrote:
> 
> 
> That is really helpful Alan.  A pair of fine papers!  
> 
> I visited Australia & NZ a few years back and started using iNaturalist and 
> then the Seek  app, so I’m now an 
> enthusiastic CS observation reporter.
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> David G
> 
>> On 21 Jun 2022, at 12:46 am, Alan Stenhouse  
>> wrote:
>> 
>> Hi David
>> 
>> In a couple of my publications, I described developing apps with Livecode 
>> and referred to www.livecode.org and www.livecode.com, but didn't include 
>> anything in the references as there was nothing (AFAICS at that time) that 
>> would satisfy scientific publication standards.
>> 
>> See: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2351989420309173
>> and
>> https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2351989421001761
>> 
>> HTH
>> 
>> cheers
>> 
>> Alan
>> 
>> 
>>> On 18 Jun 2022, at 1:30 am, David V Glasgow wrote:
>>> 
 On 16 Jun 2022, at 9:08 pm, J. Landman Gay via use-livecode 
  wrote:
 
 Is there a reason not to use the LC site URL, either alone or in addition 
 to the Wikipedia one?
>>> 
>>> The https://livecode.com landing page is rather sparse, and focussed on 
>>> drawing customers in rather than conveying anything about text processing, 
>>> or obvious links to information on text processing.  No criticism of that 
>>> at all.  It?s a commercial site.  
>>> 
>>> Wiki page has the disadvantage of a banner warning about link rot, but the 
>>> advantage of lots of information presented in a more academic and neutral 
>>> style.
>>> 
>>> 
 
 Re: the errors, they look like examples of functions that would return 
 "false" but I haven't seen them in context.
 --
>>> 
>>> They do, don?t they.  From memory, that wasn?t the context though.  
>>> 
>>> Cheers
>>> 
>>> David G
>> 
> 
> ___
> use-livecode mailing list
> use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
> Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
> preferences:
> http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode


___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode

OT Re: Referencing Livecode

[David V Glasgow via use-livecode]

That is really helpful Alan.  A pair of fine papers!  

I visited Australia & NZ a few years back and started using iNaturalist and 
then the Seek  app, so I’m now an 
enthusiastic CS observation reporter.

Cheers,

David G

> On 21 Jun 2022, at 12:46 am, Alan Stenhouse  wrote:
> 
> Hi David
> 
> In a couple of my publications, I described developing apps with Livecode and 
> referred to www.livecode.org and www.livecode.com, but didn't include 
> anything in the references as there was nothing (AFAICS at that time) that 
> would satisfy scientific publication standards.
> 
> See: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2351989420309173
> and
> https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2351989421001761
> 
> HTH
> 
> cheers
> 
> Alan
> 
> 
>> On 18 Jun 2022, at 1:30 am, David V Glasgow wrote:
>> 
>>> On 16 Jun 2022, at 9:08 pm, J. Landman Gay via use-livecode 
>>>  wrote:
>>> 
>>> Is there a reason not to use the LC site URL, either alone or in addition 
>>> to the Wikipedia one?
>> 
>> The https://livecode.com landing page is rather sparse, and focussed on 
>> drawing customers in rather than conveying anything about text processing, 
>> or obvious links to information on text processing.  No criticism of that at 
>> all.  It?s a commercial site.  
>> 
>> Wiki page has the disadvantage of a banner warning about link rot, but the 
>> advantage of lots of information presented in a more academic and neutral 
>> style.
>> 
>> 
>>> 
>>> Re: the errors, they look like examples of functions that would return 
>>> "false" but I haven't seen them in context.
>>> --
>> 
>> They do, don?t they.  From memory, that wasn?t the context though.  
>> 
>> Cheers
>> 
>> David G
> 

___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode