Re: RSYNC still uses MD5 and...

[Peter TB Brett via use-livecode]

On 01/03/2017 02:39, Alejandro Tejada via use-livecode wrote:

RSYNC would be a nice and useful addition
to LiveCode engine.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rsync

Could RSYNC be implemented fast enough
using only LiveCode scripts?


The way that rsync uses hashes isn't at all problematic.  If an attacker 
has the level of access to be able to introduce hash collisions into 
files that you're copying using rsync, then you have bigger problems 
than the hash collisions!


In my opinion, rsync isn't a wheel that needs to be reinvented using 
LiveCode. :-)  However, yes, since rsync is almost entirely constrained 
by IO bandwidth, there's no reason that you couldn't rewrite it to be 
fast enough using LiveCode.


 Peter

--
Dr Peter Brett 
LiveCode Technical Project Manager

lcb-mode for Emacs: https://github.com/peter-b/lcb-mode

___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode

RSYNC still uses MD5 and...

[Alejandro Tejada via use-livecode]

RSYNC would be a nice and useful addition
to LiveCode engine.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rsync

Could RSYNC be implemented fast enough
using only LiveCode scripts?

Al
___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode