Re: Script Compiler - One More Question
Me: > How do you plan to avoid a repeat of the LC 7 bug onslaught? Heather: > Curry - please email support and we will be happy to help with this. Thanks! But I don't see this as a private 1-on-1 support issue; if it's not a general/public approach, not sure it could help. So for my purposes, I believe that answers the question. (I'll save us both the time and skip the support ticket.) Back to work Best wishes, Curry Kenworthy Custom Software Development "Better Methods, Better Results" Innovative Christian LiveCode Training and Consulting http://livecodeconsulting.com/ ___ use-livecode mailing list use-livecode@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
Re: Script Compiler - One More Question
Curry - please email support and we will be happy to help with this. Best Regards, Heather Heather Laine Customer Services Manager LiveCode Ltd www.livecode.com > On 10 Feb 2022, at 16:31, Curry Kenworthy via use-livecode > wrote: > > > Script Compiler - One More Question: > > After the survey there was an email "Your Questions Answered." > I put a concern in the survey, just without a question mark! > > (And I don't recall any survey directions specifying > that concerns/comments should be worded as questions.) > > It's easy to add a question mark: > > Deja vu of LC 7. Big new changes + new engineers = LOTS OF BUGS! After all > these years, we are just recently starting to turn the tide on LC 6-9 bugs. > How do you plan to avoid a repeat of the LC 7 bug onslaught?* > > Knowing that would help me decide my level of interest/support. > Good project if such problems can be avoided; and vice versa. > > * The proposed changes also deeply involve the non-compiled engine; > to clarify, I'm primarily concerned about the non-compiled product. > (All the more so, since it's impacted whether we use compiler or not!) > > Thanks! > > Best wishes, > > Curry Kenworthy > > Custom Software Development > "Better Methods, Better Results" > Innovative Christian LiveCode Training and Consulting > http://livecodeconsulting.com/ > > ___ > use-livecode mailing list > use-livecode@lists.runrev.com > Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription > preferences: > http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode ___ use-livecode mailing list use-livecode@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
Re: Script Compiler - One More Question
Isn't that a question you should ask the people of Livecode Ltd. directly? > Am 10.02.2022 um 17:31 schrieb Curry Kenworthy via use-livecode > : > > > Script Compiler - One More Question: > > After the survey there was an email "Your Questions Answered." > I put a concern in the survey, just without a question mark! > > (And I don't recall any survey directions specifying > that concerns/comments should be worded as questions.) > > It's easy to add a question mark: > > Deja vu of LC 7. Big new changes + new engineers = LOTS OF BUGS! After all > these years, we are just recently starting to turn the tide on LC 6-9 bugs. > How do you plan to avoid a repeat of the LC 7 bug onslaught?* > > Knowing that would help me decide my level of interest/support. > Good project if such problems can be avoided; and vice versa. > > * The proposed changes also deeply involve the non-compiled engine; > to clarify, I'm primarily concerned about the non-compiled product. > (All the more so, since it's impacted whether we use compiler or not!) > > Thanks! > > Best wishes, > > Curry Kenworthy > > Custom Software Development > "Better Methods, Better Results" > Innovative Christian LiveCode Training and Consulting > http://livecodeconsulting.com/ > > ___ > use-livecode mailing list > use-livecode@lists.runrev.com > Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription > preferences: > http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode ___ use-livecode mailing list use-livecode@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
Script Compiler - One More Question
Script Compiler - One More Question: After the survey there was an email "Your Questions Answered." I put a concern in the survey, just without a question mark! (And I don't recall any survey directions specifying that concerns/comments should be worded as questions.) It's easy to add a question mark: Deja vu of LC 7. Big new changes + new engineers = LOTS OF BUGS! After all these years, we are just recently starting to turn the tide on LC 6-9 bugs. How do you plan to avoid a repeat of the LC 7 bug onslaught?* Knowing that would help me decide my level of interest/support. Good project if such problems can be avoided; and vice versa. * The proposed changes also deeply involve the non-compiled engine; to clarify, I'm primarily concerned about the non-compiled product. (All the more so, since it's impacted whether we use compiler or not!) Thanks! Best wishes, Curry Kenworthy Custom Software Development "Better Methods, Better Results" Innovative Christian LiveCode Training and Consulting http://livecodeconsulting.com/ ___ use-livecode mailing list use-livecode@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
