sez Bob Sneidar :>Apparently nothing is a real.
Neither is anything strictly a real.
[singing] "Let me take you down, 'coz I'm going to Strawberry Fields…"
___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to
use-livecode
> To: How to use LiveCode
> Cc: Mark Waddingham
> Sent: Sat, Apr 25, 2020 1:14 pm
> Subject: Re: What is a real?
>
> The ‘is strictly’ operators allow you to detect what the actual internal
> storage type of a value is. Some things generate numbers which are stored
ddingham via use-livecode
To: How to use LiveCode
Cc: Mark Waddingham
Sent: Sat, Apr 25, 2020 1:14 pm
Subject: Re: What is a real?
The ‘is strictly’ operators allow you to detect what the actual internal
storage type of a value is. Some things generate numbers which are stored as
int32s but most
On 4/25/20 10:23 AM, doc hawk via use-livecode wrote:
[that said, the first non-comment line in any Fortran I write is “Implicit
None”. My livecode is also always set to require explicit declaration, and
I’m the odd one out here in really wonting to add strong types to livecode . .
.]
On Apr 25, 2020, at 10:19 AM, Kee Nethery via use-livecode
wrote:
>
> In FORTRAN, any variable that starts with a letter in the alphabet from “I”
> to “N” is an INteger. All other variables are reals (something expressed in
> scientific notation).
Leading to the observation that “GOD is
In FORTRAN, any variable that starts with a letter in the alphabet from “I” to
“N” is an INteger. All other variables are reals (something expressed in
scientific notation).
Kee Nethery
___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Mark mumbled,
> If it helps any (hint: it doesn't) it's the currency of Brazil.
I think it has something to do with strawberry fields . . .
___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe
IIRC).
Sent from my iPhone
> On 25 Apr 2020, at 17:44, Brian Milby via use-livecode
> wrote:
>
> In your initial example, they are all strings. 1.1+0 would be strictly a
> real. What is troubling is that I’m seeing that 1+200 is not strictly an
> integer yet the
In your initial example, they are all strings. 1.1+0 would be strictly a real.
What is troubling is that I’m seeing that 1+200 is not strictly an integer yet
the docs say it should be.
Thanks,
Brian
On Apr 25, 2020, 12:06 PM -0400, Mark Wieder via use-livecode
, wrote:
> On 4/25/20 7:40
On 4/25/20 7:40 AM, Bob Sneidar via use-livecode wrote:
Apparently nothing is a real. Neither is anything strictly a real.
put 1 is strictly a real — false
put 1.1 is strictly a real — false
put 1.1 is a real — compilation error
If it helps any (hint: it doesn't) it's the currency of Brazil.
On 4/25/2020 10:40 AM, Bob Sneidar via use-livecode wrote:
Apparently nothing is a real. Neither is anything strictly a real.
I have never heard a more philosophical statement in all my life ;-)
___
use-livecode mailing list
Apparently nothing is a real. Neither is anything strictly a real.
put 1 is strictly a real — false
put 1.1 is strictly a real — false
put 1.1 is a real — compilation error
Bob S
___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please
12 matches
Mail list logo