I'll drink to THAT!! .. but then again, I'll drink to almost anything! ...
coffee... what were you thinking?
but seriously, it's a fine idea... particularly as I got blind-sided by finding
an irrelevant inclusion (JSON Library) when I needed the mergJSON one and
the inclusions are NOT even
+1 Great idea!
Bob S
> On Oct 23, 2018, at 16:08 , Monte Goulding via use-livecode
> wrote:
>
>> On 24 Oct 2018, at 10:04 am, Andre Alves Garzia via use-livecode
>> wrote:
>>
>> As you folks may have seen earlier today, I've shipped a new product here on
>> the list. While I was building
> On 24 Oct 2018, at 10:04 am, Andre Alves Garzia via use-livecode
> wrote:
>
> As you folks may have seen earlier today, I've shipped a new product here on
> the list. While I was building the demo stack for this plugin, I had the same
> problem as you describe. In my case it boiled down
use-livecode
mailto:use-livecode@lists.runrev.com>>:
Has anyone recently tried to create a standalone app which includes either a
jsonImport or JSONToArray call?
While my code works perfectly when run within the LC API, once a standalone is
produced, it chokes on either one of these ca
monstration code simple, so I only tried to "include" the "JSON
> Library" (but also the
> "Answer Dialog" and "Ask Dialog" were checked by LC) ... should I also
> include something else?
>
> The fact that BOTH functions (jsonImport and Jso
t; the "JSON Library" (but also the
"Answer Dialog" and "Ask Dialog" were checked by LC) ... should I also include
something else?
The fact that BOTH functions (jsonImport and JsonToArray) fail (assuming they
actually call different code within LC) may be significant.
nyone recently tried to create a standalone app which includes either a
> jsonImport or JSONToArray call?
>
> While my code works perfectly when run within the LC API, once a standalone
> is produced, it chokes on either one of these calls. I've reduced the code
> to its bare
Has anyone recently tried to create a standalone app which includes either a
jsonImport or JSONToArray call?
While my code works perfectly when run within the LC API, once a standalone is
produced, it chokes on either one of these calls. I've reduced the code to
its bare essentials