Re: Multiple Quicktime driven MP3/MP4 Track Player

Hi Francis, > Am 06.05.2018 um 19:46 schrieb Francis Nugent Dixon via use-livecode > : > > Hi from Beautifull Brittany, > > I built an app which plays indivdual MP3 and MP4 tracks from a list (one line > per filename). > Simple play sequence (1 - show player -

Re: Sean?

Mark Wieder wrote: So... has anyone heard from Sean yet? I have not. He has not yet responded to a message I sent him on LinkedIn, and his last Twitter posts were just a few hours before he last posted here. I sent a connection request to his partner at his company (same last name,

Re: Has Anyone Got A Directory \"Walker\" Available

Bernd Niggemann wrote: > a combination of "private" and referenced variables (@) improves the > speed of the calls somewhat. Which version of LC did you test with? I was under the impression that since LC switched to copy-on-write for all arguments we should no longer need to use "@" for

Re: Background Long IDs

Brian Milby wrote: > I'm working on a script exporter... What do you do with the exported scripts? -- Richard Gaskin Fourth World Systems Software Design and Development for the Desktop, Mobile, and the Web

Locating the mouse

Yer: I know: mouseLoc BUT, that only returns the loaction of the mouse relative to the top-left of a stack. Let us suppose one has a stack measuring 100 by 100 pixels at the centre of one's monitor . . . And one wants to know the position of the mouse in terms of the monitor rather than

Re: Has Anyone Got A Directory \"Walker\" Available

Alex, a combination of "private" and referenced variables (@) improves the speed of the calls somewhat. Kind regards Bernd -- on mouseup local t1, t2 constant K = 1000 local x constant KX = 100 put the millisecs into t1 repeat K

Re: Has Anyone Got A Directory \"Walker\" Available

Malte Pfaff-Brill wrote: > I wonder if shelling out to DIR on Windows and LS on Linux/Mac > wouldn’t be the fastest option… Maybe, but there's overhead in setting up the shell session. Even if it's measurably faster, I would be surprised if it were noticeably faster. Anything that depends

Multiple Quicktime driven MP3/MP4 Track Player

Hi from Beautifull Brittany, I built an app which plays indivdual MP3 and MP4 tracks from a list (one line per filename). Simple play sequence (1 - show player - start player. 2 - hide player - stop player). I can stop the play function anywhere during the play sequence, but must eventually

error Error 0 on socket?

Hi Folks, I'm getting a strange socket error when I POST some base64 encoded data to a URL that has HTTPD Server running. Everything works fine when I send just a w bit of data... but a bigger chunk is giving me this error. "error Error 0 on socket" Does anyone have any idea what the

Re: error Error 0 on socket?

nevermind ..the array i was "test" sending was way bigger than i thought it was so I am unlikely to have that problem with the regular requests i am anticipating. so the problems were first coming from the arraydecode function and then turning into that weird socket error somehow..

Re: Locating the mouse

And here he goes again: Richmond answers his own posting: screenMouse Loc On 6/5/2018 10:26 pm, Richmond Mathewson wrote: Yer: I know: mouseLoc BUT, that only returns the location of the mouse relative to the top-left of a stack. Let us suppose one has a stack measuring 100 by 100 pixels

Re: Locating the mouse

Hi Richmond, > Am 06.05.2018 um 21:26 schrieb Richmond Mathewson via use-livecode > : > > Yer: I know: mouseLoc > > BUT, that only returns the loaction of the mouse relative to the top-left of > a stack. > Let us suppose one has a stack measuring 100 by 100

Re: Has Anyone Got A Directory \"Walker\" Available

I wonder if shelling out to DIR on Windows and LS on Linux/Mac wouldn’t be the fastest option… Cheers, Malte ___ use-livecode mailing list use-livecode@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription

Re: Has Anyone Got A Directory "Walker" Available

Ah, that makes sense. It's not so much the recursion per se, but the more general advantage of inline processing vs handler calls. In the test case below you know how many levels deep you're going, which seems a good fit for inline loops. But how do we handle cases like directory traversal,

Re: Locating the mouse

Thanks Klaus: however, as you'll see, I fired off a question 2 minutes before I found the answer. Nothing new there. Richmond. On 6/5/2018 10:31 pm, Klaus major-k via use-livecode wrote: Hi Richmond, Am 06.05.2018 um 21:26 schrieb Richmond Mathewson via use-livecode

Re: Has Anyone Got A Directory \\\"Walker\\\" Available

Bernd wrote: > Richard wrote: >> Which version of LC did you test with? >> I was under the impression that since LC switched to copy-on-write >> for all >arguments we should no longer need to use "@" for >> performance, only for for logic. > > > I tested using LC 9 GM, what kind of results do you

Re: Background Long IDs

@Mark, same as before. If the card has been visited then it starts with group, if not it starts with bkgnd. @Richard, probably more than you asked, but this is the project in a nutshell... The end goal is to enable a binary stack to have the scripts within tracked via GitHub. A closely related

Re: Has Anyone Got A Directory \\\"Walker\\\" Available

>Which version of LC did you test with? >I was under the impression that since LC switched to copy-on-write for all >>arguments we should no longer need to use "@" for performance, only for for >logic. Richard, I tested using LC 9 GM, what kind of results do you get? Kind regards Bernd

Re: Has Anyone Got A Directory \"Walker\" Available

there's actually a directory walker search one can use in a shell command on mac that is quite speedy... let me report back. sqb -- Stephen Barncard - Sebastopol Ca. USA - mixstream.org On Sun, May 6, 2018 at 2:29 PM, Richard Gaskin via use-livecode < use-livecode@lists.runrev.com> wrote: >

Re: Has Anyone Got A Directory \\\"Walker\\\" Available

On 05/06/2018 02:42 PM, Richard Gaskin via use-livecode wrote: Did copy-on-write get changed in v9, or is the scope of its effects just more limited than I had understood it to be? I'm still at the point of not trusting copy-on-write yet, but I think you're misinterpreting your results. If

Re: slow listserv

On 05/06/2018 07:20 PM, Mark Wieder via use-livecode wrote: Anyone else finding the listserv slow? I just posted a message and it showed up on the list after an hour and a half. ...and of course now it's working again. nvm. -- Mark Wieder ahsoftw...@gmail.com

Re: Background Long IDs

Hi. Maybe I am not building this correctly. I made a new stack of five cards. I placed a BG group on card 3. It has ID 1005. On card 1 in a button script: on mouseUp put the long id of background ID 1005 of this stack into fld 2 end mouseUp In new sessions, whether I visit card 3 or not, I

slow listserv

Anyone else finding the listserv slow? I just posted a message and it showed up on the list after an hour and a half. -- Mark Wieder ahsoftw...@gmail.com ___ use-livecode mailing list use-livecode@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to

Re: Background Long IDs

Could be where it is being referenced. From the message box: put the long id of background id 1020 of stack "AutoScriptSaver" Returns: bkgnd id 1020 of stack "/Users/milby/Desktop/AutoScriptSaver.livecode" Until after I visit the card, when it changes to: group id 1020 of card id 1025 of stack

Re: Background Long IDs

I've pushed an initial version to GitHub: https://github.com/bwmilby/lc-misc/tree/master/ScriptTracker The code is also there with the stack so it can be viewed online without downloading the stack. The code was exported from itself, so you can see how it constructs the exports. If you enable

Re: Has Anyone Got A Directory "Walker" Available

On 06/05/2018 20:12, Richard Gaskin via use-livecode wrote: Ah, that makes sense.  It's not so much the recursion per se, but the more general advantage of inline processing vs handler calls. Exactly. In the test case below you know how many levels deep you're going, which seems a good fit

Re: Has Anyone Got A Directory \"Walker\" Available

I doubt if it would work out faster. A quick test of  time ls -lR > null gives 166 ms vs. the 179 I get from the non-recursive tree walker - so by the time you gather that output, and re-format back to something more usable, I think you'd probably come out the same or slower. Alex. On