Re: ANN: FieldGroup - a simple rich text editor field.

Dear Alex, This is great! Thanks for sharing! :D On Thu, 23 Jul 2020 at 01:10, Alex Tweedly via use-livecode < use-livecode@lists.runrev.com> wrote: > I'd like to announce the Beta (i.e. v0.1) release of my simple rich text > field. Currently it's not on Github or anywhere sensible - it's just

Re: ANN: FieldGroup - a simple rich text editor field.

Hi Alex, this is really a great contribution. Thank you very much. - Matthias Rebbe Life Is Too Short For Boring Code > Am 23.07.2020 um 02:08 schrieb Alex Tweedly via use-livecode > : > > I'd like to announce the Beta (i.e. v0.1) release of my simple rich text > field. Currently it's not

hhOText(community.livecode.hermann.orientedtext)

I have been playing around with this community orientedText widget to see if it is suitable to be used for xAxis Labels at 45 degrees in a bar chart. I’m not sure I am using it correctly. I have set it up similar to this: repeat for each line tLabel in tDataLabels create widget (tLabel) as

Re: ANN: FieldGroup - a simple rich text editor field.

Alex Tweedly wrote: I'd like to announce the Beta (i.e. v0.1) release of my simple rich text field. Currently it's not on Github or anywhere sensible - it's just on my own download site (see URL at end of this email). I'd be happy if anyone finds it useful, and / or has feedback that might

Re: ANN: FieldGroup - a simple rich text editor field.

On 23/07/2020 17:20, Richard Gaskin via use-livecode wrote: https://www.tweedly.org/downloads/FieldGroupsample.livecode Thanks for posting this, Alex. Super cool. I didn't find license info in the package - did I miss it? What license is this distributed under? Sorry, I should have

Re: ANN: FieldGroup - a simple rich text editor field.

Alex Tweedly wrote: On 23/07/2020 17:20, Richard Gaskin via use-livecode wrote: https://www.tweedly.org/downloads/FieldGroupsample.livecode Thanks for posting this, Alex. Super cool. I didn't find license info in the package - did I miss it? What license is this distributed under? Sorry,

This is what happens when a tech-master is asked to write a 'guide'!

Hi all, Can we have the guides rewritten to be understood by plebs like me please? I've re-read this several times, slowly, and still having trouble working it out. Is there some Yale course to get a Phd in LCB so we get to understand it? I'll put curly braces around everything unintelligible by

Re: This is what happens when a tech-master is asked to write a 'guide'!

I wouldn’t expect anyone to need to use that guide. I’m not even sure how you would manually use hand coded LCB bytecode. It probably just needs to be moved to the end and have a note added indicating that is isn’t intended for general use. Sent from my iPhone > On Jul 23, 2020, at 4:18 PM,

Re: Functions running in IDE, but not running in standalone

Matthias, Thanks so much for all of your advice. I actually added tsNet as an inclusion very recently when Curry mentioned it, thinking it might help. I have eliminated it from my last version. Its use and its non-use did not change anything. At this point the only things that seem to be

Re: Functions running in IDE, but not running in standalone

> Am 23.07.2020 um 23:16 schrieb Bruce Pokras via use-livecode > : > > Matthias, > > Thanks so much for all of your advice. > > I actually added tsNet as an inclusion very recently when Curry mentioned it, > thinking it might help. I have eliminated it from my last version. Its use > and