Hi
People are missing something here.
Apple allows programs from Argos, Sams, Amazon (not books) , Free software
access for the yearly fee of $99.
They take 30% the FIRST years and subsequently 15% - that second figure to
me is the important one.
You have access to that market and IF you have
Sean Cole wrote:
> It's all a pointless debate. Apple can do what it likes with THEIR
> *platform*! if YOU _choose_ not to agree with their policies for use
> on THEIR platform, YOU can _choose_ to go elsewhere.
>
> The same or similar issues come up with ALL brands! Google, Samsung,
> Nike, AT,
Lagi Pittas wrote:
If you sell a $10,000 worth in the second year you get $8500 without
having to spend as much on advertising.
Oh?
The app store is a directory, not a substitute for marketing.
Simply having one of a few million indistiguishably-uniform records in a
database is
Lagi Pittas wrote:
> I didn't mean no marketing - it's like the folks that buy books about
> the law of attraction and sit on their fata arses visualizing a BMW.
>
> You can sit in your chair visualizing all you want but the BMW, and
> bigger house won't come to you if you don't get off your
Sean,
> Andre, What on earth are you talking about regards browsers? There is a
> crapload of other browsers to choose from on ALL platforms, including iOS.
> They all play happily by the rules. Which ones are you talking about that
> can't get onto Apple because they choose not to follow the
J,
On some but not all iOS 12 devices you must load local html files from the
temp folder. I went around this with Panos for a week before he figured this
out. See QCC 22816 https://quality.livecode.com/show_bug.cgi?id=22816
Ralph DiMola
IT Director
Evergreen Information Services
I have a browser widget that loads content from the local drive on iOS devices. It works fine
with iOS 13 but fails on iOS 12. The app was built with LC 9.6.1 rc 2. I know webkit was
changed since we last built a year ago, but shouldn't it still work with iOS 12?
When it fails, the browser
"Microsoft can do what it likes with THEIR *platform*! if YOU
_choose_ not to agree with their policies for use on THEIR
platform, YOU can _choose_ to go elsewhere."
Absolutely... on THEIR *XBox* platform.
Microsoft leveraged anti-competitive practices to squeeze out competition on
the
What if you unload it.
Turn messages off. Load your stack and build it right away. Does that work?
Op vr 14 aug. 2020 17:25 schreef Paul Dupuis via use-livecode <
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com>:
> The stack where building a Windows Standalone just stays on "Attaching
> Engine..." forever had no
Sean Cole wrote:
Richard
Watch my videos I posted using Dropbox. It’s madness. And it’s been CONFIRMED
and NOT FIXED for a very long time
There was more than one video, and several others also reported being
unable to reproduce the issue, so my question for Tom was seeking
clarity on
Also folks, EPIC didn't do that because "they thought they could get away
with it". These are all strategic attacks at Apple at the same time that
the EU is looking to maybe mount an antitrust case against them. So you
have multiple companies taking action that will either prompt a reaction
from
Hi Richard,
I didn't mean no marketing - it's like the folks that buy books about the
law of attraction and sit on their fata arses visualizing a BMW.
You can sit in your chair visualizing all you want but the BMW, and bigger
house won't come to you if you don't get off your ass and meet the
On 8/14/20 9:46 AM, Sean Cole (Pi) via use-livecode wrote:
It's all a pointless debate. Apple can do what it likes with THEIR
*platform*! if YOU_choose_ not to agree with their policies for use on
THEIR platform, YOU can_choose_ to go elsewhere.
We can't all choose.
Remember Mylan, the drug
Brian Milby wrote:
"Microsoft can do what it likes with THEIR *platform*! if YOU
_choose_ not to agree with their policies for use on THEIR
platform, YOU can _choose_ to go elsewhere."
Absolutely... on THEIR *XBox* platform.
Microsoft leveraged anti-competitive practices to squeeze out
On 8/14/20 3:01 PM, Ralph DiMola via use-livecode wrote:
On some but not all iOS 12 devices you must load local html files from the
temp folder. I went around this with Panos for a week before he figured this
out. See QCC 22816https://quality.livecode.com/show_bug.cgi?id=22816
Oh wow. That's
By the way you can put all local html files into the temp folder(or
subfolders of temp). That works for v13 and all v12 devices.
Ralph DiMola
IT Director
Evergreen Information Services
rdim...@evergreeninfo.net
-Original Message-
From: use-livecode
Thanks Richard, Brian and Mark.
Now that the rush is over I can breathe and try to work this out, again, to
make it simple for even simpletons to understand! ;) It is, as said before,
an issue that has been an issue for 6 years, gets poo-poo'd and ignored
along with the plethora of other
Oh, just to summarize the issue:
https://quality.livecode.com/buglist.cgi?quicksearch=lcfm
If an object you wish to move between group layers is on the root of the
card it is not a problem. As soon as all of those layers (groups and
objects) get nested into a group, that's when things start
Sean
I really didn’t mean to imply the issue didn’t exist and was truly attempting
to reproduce the environment as closely as possible to see the issue. I went
as far as choosing the same object types and structure for the card as in the
video including visibility.
Is this a stack that
On 8/14/20 12:06 PM, Lagi Pittas via use-livecode wrote:
Same as winning the lottery - you have to have a ticket.
Winning the lottery is cheaper if you don't buy a ticket.
And the odds are about the same.
--
Mark Wieder
ahsoftw...@gmail.com
___
Mark/Panos,
Thanks for all your help, this worked like a charm! I got the userAgent from
a v12 iPad and v13 iPad. For any other iPad OS version I use the v13
version.
Ralph DiMola
IT Director
Evergreen Information Services
rdim...@evergreeninfo.net
-Original Message-
From: use-livecode
“I'm just a citizen, like billions of others, looking at the
ever-more-accelerated concentration of wealth, power, and control into the
hands of just five people, and wondering if this is really in everyone's best
interests...“
Probably not. But anything considered must be done very carefully
On 8/14/20 3:33 PM, Brian Milby via use-livecode wrote:
If I can get a stack that demonstrates the issue, I would like to poke around
and see if anything jumps out. If it is engine level, it is probably a bit out
of my lane (although I have contributed a few lines of C++). If it is IDE I
On 8/14/20 2:54 PM, Ralph DiMola via use-livecode wrote:
Mark/Panos,
Thanks for all your help, this worked like a charm! I got the userAgent from
a v12 iPad and v13 iPad. For any other iPad OS version I use the v13
version.
Just curious... what userAgent string worked for you?
--
Mark
There is a song to be written for
https://webaim.org/blog/user-agent-string-history/. It may have multiple
time signatures... but I digress. Here's the code that's working for me:
if the environment = "mobile" and the platform = "iphone" and the machine
contains "iPad" then -- one can never be
On August 14, 2020 8:10:59 PM "Sean Cole \(Pi\) via use-livecode"
wrote:
Oh, just to summarize the issue:
https://quality.livecode.com/buglist.cgi?quicksearch=lcfm
I'd hardly call 16 bugs "abandonware". They've fixed far more than that.
LCFM is important. I know you don't believe it, but
Hello all,
Definitely this is related to the user-agent. It seems twitter recently has
become stricter on this:
https://help.twitter.com/en/using-twitter/twitter-supported-browsers
Richard
Watch my videos I posted using Dropbox. It’s madness. And it’s been CONFIRMED
and NOT FIXED for a very long time
https://quality.livecode.com/show_bug.cgi?id=18818
https://quality.livecode.com/show_bug.cgi?id=19455
Probably FIXED but still marked as CONFIRMED
Waaah, now even EPIC with Fortnite has been kicked off the appstore,
because they found a way to sell things past the appstore. And then Apple
don't get 30%
https://tweakers.net/nieuws/170916/apple-verwijdert-fortnite-uit-app-store.html
It's in dutch but you get the message.
or this one
Thanks Panos and Mark!
So... to recap..
1) get the userAgent in Safari on my 10.14.6 Mac
2) in App (If the platform="iphone" then set userAgent to this value).
Should I use the userAgent globally for all browser widget http(s) requests
on platform = iphone?
Will this affect any other tsNet
On 2020-08-14 14:01, Mark Waddingham via use-livecode wrote:
On 2020-08-14 13:31, Ralph DiMola via use-livecode wrote:
Should I use the userAgent globally for all browser widget http(s)
requests
on platform = iphone?
Isn't the issue on iPad?
Hah - ignore this - I forgot to edit it when I
Bypassing Apple in app purchasing is technically trivial, plenty of apps have
done it for years and they have followed the App Store rules when doing so.
Physical services (eg Plumbers) and physical products (eg Amazon) they cannot
use Apple IAP. Digital goods and services (eg Epic) are
Hi all,
It's all a pointless debate. Apple can do what it likes with THEIR
*platform*! if YOU _choose_ not to agree with their policies for use on
THEIR platform, YOU can _choose_ to go elsewhere.
The same or similar issues come up with ALL brands! Google, Samsung, Nike,
AT, Ford, Cadbury, so on
The stack where building a Windows Standalone just stays on "Attaching
Engine..." forever had no 'closeStack' handlers at all.
I added the following:
on closeStack
-build close issue--
if the environment is "development" and \
there is a stack
On 2020-08-14 13:31, Ralph DiMola via use-livecode wrote:
Thanks Panos and Mark!
So... to recap..
1) get the userAgent in Safari on my 10.14.6 Mac
2) in App (If the platform="iphone" then set userAgent to this value).
Pretty much - although I recommend not using the userAgent string from a
35 matches
Mail list logo
