LiveCode Server Shared Hosting Environment

2022-03-24 Thread Ralph DiMola via use-livecode
Is there any way without root access to solve the problem of missing libraries preventing LiveCode server from running in a shared server environment? I'm getting this error when running the 9.6.6 64 bit server from the command line. ./livecode-server-pro: /lib64/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.17

Re: Livecode Server on Synology NAS with Intel cpu

2021-12-22 Thread matthias rebbe via use-livecode
> Am 22.12.2021 um 21:51 schrieb Mark Wieder via use-livecode > : > > Sorry - my Synology server has an arm processor, and there has never been an > arm build of the server. Plus now it appears that the server build requires a > separate license. > > I take it you've already been through

Re: Livecode Server on Synology NAS with Intel cpu

2021-12-22 Thread Mark Wieder via use-livecode
On 12/21/21 2:54 PM, matthias rebbe via use-livecode wrote: Hi, is there someone on the list who is using Livecode Server on a Synology NAS with Intel cpu? If so, did you manage to get it working also with the webserver or only from command line? Today i installed Livecode Server on my

Some questions about Livecode standalones / Livecode Server on Synology NAS with Intel cpu

2021-12-21 Thread matthias rebbe via use-livecode
Hi, is there someone on the list who is using Livecode Server on a Synology NAS with Intel cpu? If so, did you manage to get it working also with the webserver or only from command line? Today i installed Livecode Server on my Synology NAS with Intel cpu. I am able to run Livecode scripts from

Re: Writing file to server with Livecode Server

2021-07-09 Thread Tim Selander via use-livecode
Of course, right after posting, new ideas come to mind. Using "put (variable) into URL (server file)" failed, but using the old Open file (server file) write (variable) to file (server file) close file (server file) still works fine. Sorry for the disturbance! Tim Selander Tokyo, Japan

Writing file to server with Livecode Server

2021-07-09 Thread Tim Selander via use-livecode
Hi, Several years back, I had a POST web form for our company where I saved responses to a .csv file on the same server and same folder as the .lc file. (All hosted on on-rev.com) That page is long gone, but I now need to do the same thing. But when I try to write the data to the csv file,

Re: Considering work with livecode server

2021-01-24 Thread Bob Sneidar via use-livecode
certain inalienable rights… Ahhh. I love cheese. Bob S On Jan 24, 2021, at 9:26 AM, Mark Smith via use-livecode mailto:use-livecode@lists.runrev.com>> wrote: Thanks for weighing in on this issue Kee. I realize Apple grants unto itself certain inalienable rights that are not always (in my

Re: Considering work with livecode server

2021-01-24 Thread Mark Smith via use-livecode
Thanks for weighing in on this issue Kee. I realize Apple grants unto itself certain inalienable rights that are not always (in my opinion) wise, or justified (ie. they are open to all sorts of corporate bias and malfeasance) but as you say, “them’s the rules” and if you want to play in their

Re: Considering work with livecode server

2021-01-24 Thread kee nethery via use-livecode
> On Jan 20, 2021, at 4:20 AM, Mark Smith via use-livecode > wrote: > > Thanks Kee, but I am a bit puzzled by the restriction. > > That would require complicity from the businesses, which if reputable would > be a stretch, no? There is a significantly large number of certified developers.

Re: Considering work with livecode server

2021-01-20 Thread ELS Prothero via use-livecode
Andre, You are probably correct. Thanks to all of you who have responded to my question about deployment on the web. Best, Bill William Prothero http://es.earthednet.org > On Jan 20, 2021, at 8:22 AM, Andre Garzia wrote: > >  > Bill, > > :-) that topic is too large for a book to be

Re: Considering work with livecode server

2021-01-20 Thread Andre Garzia via use-livecode
Bill, :-) that topic is too large for a book to be honest. What I recommend is actually building a desktop standalone. Forget the web for that app, push for an app. Best A On Wed, 20 Jan 2021 at 16:20, ELS Prothero < proth...@earthlearningsolutions.org> wrote: > Thank you, Andre, for you

Re: Considering work with livecode server

2021-01-20 Thread ELS Prothero via use-livecode
Thank you, Andre, for you wisdom. What I take from your comments is if I want to develop dynamic interactive web based apps with Livecode, I should get up to speed on JavaScript and will need to either use Livecode to generate html5, compiled with webAssembly, or find another platform to

Re: Considering work with livecode server

2021-01-20 Thread Andre Garzia via use-livecode
WebAssembly (aka WASM) is not a silver bullet. It is not something like "you compile to WebAssembly and then PROFIT". WebAssembly and ASM.js (which is what the current HTML5 LC Runtime uses) are very similar. The advantages of WASM is that it is a lot smaller – since it is bytecode and not

Re: Considering work with livecode server

2021-01-20 Thread Andre Garzia via use-livecode
So, Displaying bundled content only (or mostly) allows Apple's static analysis tools to take a look at your app. They can also identify outgoing connections, so they know if you are opening remote pages. If all you do is display local content, and there is no outgoing connections, then security

Re: Considering work with livecode server

2021-01-20 Thread Andrew at MidWest Coast Media via use-livecode
> Thanks Kee, but I am a bit puzzled by the restriction. > > That would require complicity from the businesses, which if reputable would > be a stretch, no? For example, if I had an app that linked to course > selections on University websites, are they going to suggest that these could > be

Re: Considering work with livecode server

2021-01-20 Thread Mark Smith via use-livecode
Thanks Kee, but I am a bit puzzled by the restriction. That would require complicity from the businesses, which if reputable would be a stretch, no? For example, if I had an app that linked to course selections on University websites, are they going to suggest that these could be portals to

RE: Considering work with livecode server

2021-01-20 Thread Paul Richards via use-livecode
: William Prothero Subject: Re: Considering work with livecode server Hmmm…. I see: "Add WebAssembly build target in HTML5 deployment”, in the"team is working on right now” category. I guess, given all the delays and getting HTML5 up, I won’t hold my breath. But, I’ll certainly b

Re: Considering work with livecode server

2021-01-19 Thread Richard Gaskin via use-livecode
kee nethery wrote: > On Jan 19, 2021, at 7:58 AM, Mark Smith wrote: >> >> Hi Andre, how are “apps to bundled content” different from “apps that >> are portals to web content" (Jacque’s description)? Or put another >> way, if someone wanted to design a tourist app that highlighted >> interesting

Re: Considering work with livecode server

2021-01-19 Thread Richard Gaskin via use-livecode
William Prothero wrote: > It would sure be nice if there was some equivalent to shockwave... For all practical purposes we do: The Shockwave plugin was an executable engine you could download and install once, and then play a wide range of scripted interactive media with it. A LiveCode

Re: Considering work with livecode server

2021-01-19 Thread kee nethery via use-livecode
> On Jan 19, 2021, at 7:58 AM, Mark Smith via use-livecode > wrote: > > Hi Andre, how are “apps to bundled content” different from “apps that are > portals to web content" (Jacque’s description)? Or put another way, if > someone wanted to design a tourist app that highlighted interesting

Re: Considering work with livecode server

2021-01-19 Thread William Prothero via use-livecode
Hmmm…. I see: "Add WebAssembly build target in HTML5 deployment”, in the"team is working on right now” category. I guess, given all the delays and getting HTML5 up, I won’t hold my breath. But, I’ll certainly be watching for it. Gaads, another subscription to purchase. But getting real livecode

Re: Considering work with livecode server

2021-01-19 Thread William de Smet via use-livecode
WebAssembly is on the roadmap. https://livecode.com/resources/roadmap/ > Op 19 jan. 2021 om 20:43 heeft William Prothero via use-livecode > het volgende geschreven: > > Dan: > I just did a bit of Googling and wow! It sounds like a capability to compile > to WebAssembly would put LiveCode

Re: Considering work with livecode server

2021-01-19 Thread William Prothero via use-livecode
Dan: I just did a bit of Googling and wow! It sounds like a capability to compile to WebAssembly would put LiveCode in the big time. I wonder if there is any interest from the dev team. Sounds much more useful than HTML5. Best, Bill > On Jan 19, 2021, at 11:13 AM, Dan Brown wrote: > > When

Re: Considering work with livecode server

2021-01-19 Thread Dan Brown via use-livecode
When livecode supports WebAssembly as a build target you'll be able to do what you've asked On Tue, 19 Jan 2021, 20:46 William Prothero via use-livecode, < use-livecode@lists.runrev.com> wrote: > Thanks, all, for your comments. It would sure be nice if there was some > equivalent to shockwave,

Re: Considering work with livecode server

2021-01-19 Thread William Prothero via use-livecode
Thanks, all, for your comments. It would sure be nice if there was some equivalent to shockwave, back in the days. Of course, downloadable plug-ins like shockwave and flash apparently have too many security issues and are not allowed anymore. HTML5 eventually? I assume HTML5 apps would run in

Re: Considering work with livecode server

2021-01-19 Thread Bob Sneidar via use-livecode
If only! Bob S On Jan 19, 2021, at 5:56 AM, Andre Garzia via use-livecode mailto:use-livecode@lists.runrev.com>> wrote: A website from 1995 needs to be just as valid to the browser as one from 2021. ___ use-livecode mailing list

Re: Considering work with livecode server

2021-01-19 Thread Mark Smith via use-livecode
Hi Andre, how are “apps to bundled content” different from “apps that are portals to web content" (Jacque’s description)? Or put another way, if someone wanted to design a tourist app that highlighted interesting local tourist destinations near them with a link you can click on to purchase

Re: Considering work with livecode server

2021-01-19 Thread Richard Gaskin via use-livecode
Andre Garzia wrote: > But apps that are browsers to bundled content are OK. That is how you > get Apache Cordova and Phonegap to work. > > On Tue, 19 Jan 2021 at 02:06, Mark Wieder wrote: >> >>> On 1/18/21 2:20 PM, William Prothero via use-livecode wrote: >>> Building a single web-based app that

Re: Considering work with livecode server

2021-01-19 Thread Andre Garzia via use-livecode
Bill, Let me second what Richard said, you'd be better served by building desktop stack apps than by building web apps. There is no silver bullet for doing web work, there is no magical technology that makes it as easy as LC. The Web is a design by committee with various multi-billion companies

Re: Considering work with livecode server

2021-01-19 Thread Andre Garzia via use-livecode
But apps that are browsers to bundled content are OK. That is how you get Apache Cordova and Phonegap to work. On Tue, 19 Jan 2021 at 02:06, Mark Wieder via use-livecode < use-livecode@lists.runrev.com> wrote: > On 1/18/21 2:20 PM, William Prothero via use-livecode wrote: > > > Building a single

Re: Considering work with livecode server

2021-01-18 Thread J. Landman Gay via use-livecode
That's right. Apps that are just portals to web content are forbidden. -- Jacqueline Landman Gay | jac...@hyperactivesw.com HyperActive Software | http://www.hyperactivesw.com On January 18, 2021 8:07:08 PM Mark Wieder via use-livecode wrote: On 1/18/21 2:20 PM, William Prothero via

Re: Considering work with livecode server

2021-01-18 Thread Mark Wieder via use-livecode
On 1/18/21 2:20 PM, William Prothero via use-livecode wrote: Building a single web-based app that avoids the world of all the mobile apps and desktop idiosyncrasies is attractive. I thought mobile stores (Apple, etc) explicitly disallowed apps that were essentially just web browsers to

Re: Considering work with livecode server

2021-01-18 Thread Richard Gaskin via use-livecode
William Prothero wrote: > Richard, > I did understand that the server was pretty much like php, but I > didn’t know how much beyond that it could go in terms of dynamic > interaction with screen objects. LC Server does have the ability to export graphics, but being at the far end of an HTTP

Re: Considering work with livecode server

2021-01-18 Thread Rick Harrison via use-livecode
Hi Bill, If you just want to put together good-looking quick and dirty webpages that don’t need database interaction, you might want to use Apple’s Keynote software. You can put together a presentation with links from one page to another, and just export the whole thing as HTML. It works really

Re: Considering work with livecode server

2021-01-18 Thread William Prothero via use-livecode
Richard, I did understand that the server was pretty much like php, but I didn’t know how much beyond that it could go in terms of dynamic interaction with screen objects. The reason I wanted to look into it’s use in a browser is that for education, lower level grades use a lot of browser

Re: Considering work with livecode server

2021-01-18 Thread Richard Gaskin via use-livecode
Bill Prothero wrote: > I’m considering doing some work with LiveCode server. ... > Can I position and drag graphic images around. For example, I’m > thinking of the capability to create an image with various parts > that I can click to hide and position based on mouse drags

Considering work with livecode server

2021-01-18 Thread prothero--- via use-livecode
Folks: I’m considering doing some work with LiveCode server. It looks like revigniter would be a good startng place, but I have questions before I invest a lot of time in it. Can I position and drag graphic images around. For example, I’m thinking of the capability to create an image

Re: Livecode server configuration: tracking down and Apache redirect

2020-12-20 Thread Richard Gaskin via use-livecode
David Bovill wrote: > The server return 400 Not Found when routing for a *.json file, while > 200 OK when routing for a *.txt file - all other conditions seem the > same. ... > The .htaccess in the $DOCUMENT_ROOT folder does not mention json file > endings. Ah, we may have been looking at this

Re: Livecode server configuration: tracking down and Apache redirect

2020-12-20 Thread David Bovill via use-livecode
Thanks for the tips Richard: On 18 Dec 2020, 21:05 +, Richard Gaskin via use-livecode , wrote: > David Bovill wrote: > > > I have a Livecode server running Revigniter under Apache on Ubuntu. I > > installed it 8 years ago or so, and it is causing redirect problems >

Re: Livecode server configuration: tracking down and Apache redirect

2020-12-18 Thread Richard Gaskin via use-livecode
David Bovill wrote: > I have a Livecode server running Revigniter under Apache on Ubuntu. I > installed it 8 years ago or so, and it is causing redirect problems > with files ending in .json. I am assuming that a long time ago a set > the configuration somewhere to handle

Livecode server configuration: tracking down and Apache redirect

2020-12-18 Thread David Bovill via use-livecode
I have a Livecode server running Revigniter under Apache on Ubuntu. I installed it 8 years ago or so, and it is causing redirect problems with files ending in .json. I am assuming that a long time ago a set the configuration somewhere to handle .json files in a particular way, but I can’t track

Re: Livecode server UNIX version (not Linux).

2020-10-31 Thread doc hawk via use-livecode
heriberto harrumphed >3) Today's macOS is descended from NeXT (which Apple acquired and > transitioned macOS to in 1999) And they got a free Jobs to go with it! Or did they buy a Jobs, and get a free OS. I’ve never quite been clear . . > 6) The Mach microkernel was replaced with the

Re: Livecode server UNIX version (not Linux).

2020-10-31 Thread Heriberto Torrado via use-livecode
difficult could it be porting Livecode Server to ARM? I tried to do this last year using the source code but I got this error: Unknown platform. I tried to remove from the source code the target platform check but it didn't work. Best, Hery On 10/29/20 1:57 PM, Richard Gaskin via use-livecode

Re: Livecode server UNIX version (not Linux).

2020-10-31 Thread Heriberto Torrado via use-livecode
Not very sure, but months ago I read this (but he seems to talk about BSD user utils more than the Kernel). https://www.quora.com/Is-macOS-considered-to-be-a-BSD-UNIX Yes, Apple’s macOS can be considered to be a BSD UNIX.    1) Apple’s macOS is an officially certified UNIX, that takes care of

Re: Livecode server UNIX version (not Linux).

2020-10-31 Thread Heriberto Torrado via use-livecode
of Livecode server for Raspberry. Livecode currently compiles for many ARM versions. How difficult could it be to adapt Livecode Server to these versions? On 10/28/20 11:06 PM, Richard Gaskin via use-livecode wrote: Heriberto Torrado wrote: > So, here is my idea: What about to create non offic

Re: Livecode server UNIX version (not Linux).

2020-10-29 Thread Richard Gaskin via use-livecode
Brian Milby wrote: > On Oct 28, 2020, at 11:57 PM, Richard Gaskin wrote: >> But Heriberto's up for an adventure, one enhancement that would lower >> RAM use and speed things up a bit is this one: >> >> https://quality.livecode.com/show_bug.cgi?id=14115 >> >> Heriberto, if that's interesting to

Re: Livecode server UNIX version (not Linux).

2020-10-29 Thread Bob Sneidar via use-livecode
Are we sure about this?? I thought Apple had moved completely away from BSD a long while back. Bob S > On Oct 28, 2020, at 12:53 , Heriberto Torrado via use-livecode > wrote: > > Thanks Andre, > > I realized that BSD kernels are not the same as MacOS kernels. > As you say: MacOS has a

RE: Livecode server UNIX version (not Linux).

2020-10-29 Thread Ralph DiMola via use-livecode
Gaskin Subject: Re: Livecode server UNIX version (not Linux). What is the workaround that you ended up using? I looked at the code once but it quickly went over my head. I couldn’t see where the fonts were pulled in, at least not where it could be cleanly intercepted. Sent from my iPhone

Re: Livecode server UNIX version (not Linux).

2020-10-29 Thread Brian Milby via use-livecode
What is the workaround that you ended up using? I looked at the code once but it quickly went over my head. I couldn’t see where the fonts were pulled in, at least not where it could be cleanly intercepted. Sent from my iPhone > On Oct 28, 2020, at 11:57 PM, Richard Gaskin via use-livecode

Re: Livecode server UNIX version (not Linux).

2020-10-29 Thread Andre Garzia via use-livecode
Hey Friends, I'm enjoying this thread a lot. I'll not be the person to tell someone not to port LC to some new ISA or OS, I think it would be great if LC would run in BSD. Personally, I don't have the time or even the skillset to help this, but I'd love to benefit from it. Incidentally this is

Re: Livecode server UNIX version (not Linux).

2020-10-28 Thread Richard Gaskin via use-livecode
Pi Digital wrote: > Here’s my take (for what it’s worth). Although Unix is used in 71.6% > (source: w3techs.com) of all known websites as of today and Linux only > 29.0%, at least we have ‘a’ distro that works on some server. That struck me as odd, so I took a moment to see how they derived

Re: Livecode server UNIX version (not Linux).

2020-10-28 Thread Richard Gaskin via use-livecode
Heriberto Torrado wrote: > So, here is my idea: What about to create non official versions of > Livecode server (for scripting purposes) for other platforms not yet > supported? > I think it could be good for RunRev: They won't have to work > supporting those versions and Li

Re: Livecode server UNIX version (not Linux).

2020-10-28 Thread Pi Digital via use-livecode
ial versions of Livecode > server (for scripting purposes) for other platforms not yet supported? > I think it could be good for RunRev: They won't have to work supporting those > versions and Livecode language will spread to other fields. > > What do you guys think? Do you think

Re: Livecode server UNIX version (not Linux).

2020-10-28 Thread Heriberto Torrado via use-livecode
Thanks Andre, I realized that BSD kernels are not the same as MacOS kernels. As you say: MacOS has a hybrid kernel based on XNU and some parts of BSD. I'm only interested in running the Livecode server version and not the IDE. So, I think that compiling could be the best solution. I have been

Re: Livecode server UNIX version (not Linux).

2020-10-28 Thread Andre Garzia via use-livecode
thinking about tinkering with a FreeBSD server and LiveCode server, > > but I didn't see a "UNIX" version, so I suppose that I have to compile > it. > > Have any of you installed LiveCode server on FreeBSD (or Solaris)? > > > > As others mentioned, this is dated informatio

Re: Livecode server UNIX version (not Linux).

2020-10-19 Thread Paul McClernan via use-livecode
> > OS X, Windows 95 through Windows 10, Raspberry Pi and "several variations > of Unix (I think is just means Linux)". > > I'm thinking about tinkering with a FreeBSD server and LiveCode server, > but I didn't see a "UNIX" version, so I suppose that I

Re: Livecode server UNIX version (not Linux).

2020-10-18 Thread Heriberto Torrado via use-livecode
I have a question.   It's not a very important question and I don’t want to bother you y 'all, so if you think is off-topic, feel free to not to respond,  I'm just curious. I've been working with Livecode for almost five years, and I never saw a LiveCode server  "UNIX" version. T

Re: Livecode server UNIX version (not Linux).

2020-10-18 Thread Heriberto Torrado via use-livecode
nt question and I don’t want to bother you y 'all, so if you think is off-topic, feel free to not to respond, I'm just curious. I've been working with Livecode for almost five years, and I never saw a LiveCode server "UNIX" version. The LiveCode Wikipedia’s article says this: LiveCode

Re: Livecode server UNIX version (not Linux).

2020-10-18 Thread Bernard Devlin via use-livecode
Which is why my sentence finishes with "... to be in a situation to take on this level of complexity." :-) Apple first bought the domain iphone.org in 1999. That the iPhone was under development was even being discussed by mainstream media such as the New York Times in 2002. The public

Re: Livecode server UNIX version (not Linux).

2020-10-17 Thread Richmond via use-livecode
spond, I'm just curious. I've been working with Livecode for almost five years, and I never saw a LiveCode server "UNIX" version. The LiveCode Wikipedia’s article says this: LiveCode runs on iOS, Android, OS X, Windows 95 through Windows 10, Raspberry Pi and "several variations of Un

Re: Livecode server UNIX version (not Linux).

2020-10-16 Thread Bernard Devlin via use-livecode
com> wrote: > Dear all, > > I have a question. It's not a very important question and I don’t want > to bother you y 'all, so if you think is off-topic, feel free to not to > respond, I'm just curious. > > I've been working with Livecode for almost five years, and I ne

Livecode server UNIX version (not Linux).

2020-10-15 Thread Heriberto Torrado via use-livecode
Dear all, I have a question. It's not a very important question and I don’t want to bother you y 'all, so if you think is off-topic, feel free to not to respond, I'm just curious. I've been working with Livecode for almost five years, and I never saw a LiveCode server "UNIX&quo

Re: LiveCode server IDE

2020-10-13 Thread Keith Clarke via use-livecode
;>> IT Director >>> Evergreen Information Services >>> rdim...@evergreeninfo.net >>> >>> -Original Message- >>> From: use-livecode [mailto:use-livecode-boun...@lists.runrev.com] On Behalf >>> Of Keith Clarke via use-livecode &

Re: LiveCode server IDE

2020-10-12 Thread Alex Tweedly via use-livecode
Original Message- From: use-livecode [mailto:use-livecode-boun...@lists.runrev.com] On Behalf Of Keith Clarke via use-livecode Sent: Monday, October 12, 2020 3:18 AM To: use-livecode@lists.runrev.com Cc: Keith Clarke Subject: LiveCode server IDE Hi folks, What is the current state of the art r

RE: LiveCode server IDE

2020-10-12 Thread Ralph DiMola via use-livecode
- From: use-livecode [mailto:use-livecode-boun...@lists.runrev.com] On Behalf Of Keith Clarke via use-livecode Sent: Monday, October 12, 2020 10:49 AM To: use-livecode@lists.runrev.com Cc: Keith Clarke Subject: Re: LiveCode server IDE Thanks for the response, Ralph. I've struggled to retain/regain

Re: LiveCode server IDE

2020-10-12 Thread Keith Clarke via use-livecode
livecode > Sent: Monday, October 12, 2020 3:18 AM > To: use-livecode@lists.runrev.com > Cc: Keith Clarke > Subject: LiveCode server IDE > > Hi folks, > What is the current state of the art regarding LiveCode server IDE - > searching around, this seems down to personal preferen

RE: LiveCode server IDE

2020-10-12 Thread Ralph DiMola via use-livecode
12, 2020 3:18 AM To: use-livecode@lists.runrev.com Cc: Keith Clarke Subject: LiveCode server IDE Hi folks, What is the current state of the art regarding LiveCode server IDE - searching around, this seems down to personal preference of text editor plus FTP? I'm Mac-based and looking to experiment

RE: LiveCode server IDE

2020-10-12 Thread Ralph DiMola via use-livecode
vices rdim...@evergreeninfo.net -Original Message- From: use-livecode [mailto:use-livecode-boun...@lists.runrev.com] On Behalf Of Keith Clarke via use-livecode Sent: Monday, October 12, 2020 3:18 AM To: use-livecode@lists.runrev.com Cc: Keith Clarke Subject: LiveCode server IDE Hi f

LiveCode server IDE

2020-10-12 Thread Keith Clarke via use-livecode
Hi folks, What is the current state of the art regarding LiveCode server IDE - searching around, this seems down to personal preference of text editor plus FTP? I'm Mac-based and looking to experiment with web services. Thanks and regards, Keith Sent from my iPad

Re: LiveCode Server Under MAMP

2020-05-27 Thread Håkan Liljegren via use-livecode
catch my interest. > > Thanks, > > Rick > > > On May 27, 2020, at 11:44 AM, Håkan Liljegren via use-livecode > > wrote: > > > > Ouch, > > > > Hit send to early, new try: > > > > Hi, > > > > I was trying to get LiveCode

Re: LiveCode Server Under MAMP

2020-05-27 Thread Håkan Liljegren via use-livecode
> Am 27.05.2020 um 17:44 schrieb Håkan Liljegren via use-livecode > > : > > > > Ouch, > > > > Hit send to early, new try: > > > > Hi, > > > > I was trying to get LiveCode server up and running under MAMP in macOS > > Catalina a

Re: LiveCode Server Under MAMP

2020-05-27 Thread matthias rebbe via use-livecode
> > I was trying to get LiveCode server up and running under MAMP in macOS > Catalina and if anyone is interested. This is what I did to get it running. > > 1. Download and unpack LiveCode Server > 2. Move livecode-server, drivers folder and externals folder into the cgi-bin >

Re: LiveCode Server Under MAMP

2020-05-27 Thread Rick Harrison via use-livecode
Did you get MAMP to work with SSL? If you do, let me know as then you might catch my interest. Thanks, Rick > On May 27, 2020, at 11:44 AM, Håkan Liljegren via use-livecode > wrote: > > Ouch, > > Hit send to early, new try: > > Hi, > > I was trying to get

LiveCode Server Under MAMP

2020-05-27 Thread Håkan Liljegren via use-livecode
Ouch, Hit send to early, new try: Hi, I was trying to get LiveCode server up and running under MAMP in macOS Catalina and if anyone is interested. This is what I did to get it running. 1. Download and unpack LiveCode Server 2. Move livecode-server, drivers folder and externals folder

LiveCode Server not notarized?

2020-05-27 Thread Håkan Liljegren via use-livecode
Hi, I was trying to get LiveCode server up and running under MAMP in macOS Catalina and if anyone is interested. This is what I did to get it running. 1. Download and unpack LiveCode Server 2. Move livecode-server, drivers folder and externals folder into the cgi-bin folder in MAMP

Re: Recommended (simple) Linux distro for Livecode server home dev/test?

2020-05-10 Thread John McKenzie via use-livecode
Hello, Kieth. My health problems have kept me from really participating on the list for a long time but I stayed as I want to get back to using Livecode at some point. Your question about linux distros for server use on old hardware though is something I can comment on. Sorry I did not post

Re: Recommended (simple) Linux distro for Livecode server home dev/test?

2020-05-10 Thread Keith Clarke via use-livecode
Which distro(s) would you recommend for a Linux newbie as the easiest >> way to repurpose an old PC, Mac Laptop or Mini to host Livecode Server >> for lightweight ‘LAMP/LAML' dev/test dabbling? >> I’ve never had a Linux desktop machine and server-wise, never had to >> delve

Re: Recommended (simple) Linux distro for Livecode server home dev/test?

2020-05-09 Thread Mark Wieder via use-livecode
On 5/9/20 6:46 AM, Keith Clarke via use-livecode wrote: Hi folks, Which distro(s) would you recommend for a Linux newbie as the easiest way to repurpose an old PC, Mac Laptop or Mini to host Livecode Server for lightweight ‘LAMP/LAML' dev/test dabbling? I’ve never had a Linux desktop machine

Re: Recommended (simple) Linux distro for Livecode server home dev/test?

2020-05-09 Thread JeeJeeStudio via use-livecode
Keith Clarke via use-livecode: Hi folks, Which distro(s) would you recommend for a Linux newbie as the easiest way to repurpose an old PC, Mac Laptop or Mini to host Livecode Server for lightweight ‘LAMP/LAML' dev/test dabbling? I’ve never had a Linux desktop machine and server-wise, never had

Re: Recommended (simple) Linux distro for Livecode server home dev/test?

2020-05-09 Thread Richard Gaskin via use-livecode
Keith Clarke wrote: > Hi folks, > Which distro(s) would you recommend for a Linux newbie as the easiest > way to repurpose an old PC, Mac Laptop or Mini to host Livecode Server > for lightweight ‘LAMP/LAML' dev/test dabbling? > > I’ve never had a Linux desktop machine and serv

Recommended (simple) Linux distro for Livecode server home dev/test?

2020-05-09 Thread Keith Clarke via use-livecode
Hi folks, Which distro(s) would you recommend for a Linux newbie as the easiest way to repurpose an old PC, Mac Laptop or Mini to host Livecode Server for lightweight ‘LAMP/LAML' dev/test dabbling? I’ve never had a Linux desktop machine and server-wise, never had to delve below C-Panel &

Livecode Server - Email

2019-11-28 Thread Sannyasin Brahmanathaswami via use-livecode
I have a email CGI from a very old cgi for the days when "revolution" was the server Now with LiveCode server, Ubuntu 18+ does have /usr/sbin/sendmail installed, at least I see that, but this old process does not work put "/usr/sbin/sendmail -t" into mprocess open proces

Re: LiveCode Server

2019-10-19 Thread Ralf Bitter via use-livecode
Thanks for the info Todd. This explains why I had an issue on Mac OS. I once added the directive to .htaccess. Ralf > On 19. Oct 2019, at 06:08, Todd Fabacher via use-livecode > wrote: > > GOOD NEWS - Got it to work. Someone should take note an issue with > Apache 2 and

Re: LiveCode Server

2019-10-19 Thread Jjs via use-livecode
ache 2.conf. the lesson should >updated as it is no longer valid. > >Todd Fabacher via use-livecode schreef >op 19 oktober 2019 06:08:03 CEST: >>GOOD NEWS - Got it to work. Someone should take note an issue with >>Apache 2 and LiveCode server >> >>SetEnvIf

Re: LiveCode Server

2019-10-19 Thread Jjs via use-livecode
ake note an issue with >Apache 2 and LiveCode server > >SetEnvIf Authorization "(.*)" HTTP_AUTHORIZATION=$1 > >For Linux in /etc/apache2/apache2.conf > >For Mac (using Homebrew) in /usr/local/etc/httpd/httpd.conf > >Adding this to .htaccess didn't work for

Re: LiveCode Server

2019-10-17 Thread Ralf Bitter via use-livecode
> On 17. Oct 2019, at 19:27, Lagi Pittas via use-livecode > wrote: > > HI Ralph > > Basically the server script does this > > put arrayEncode($_SERVER) and sends back everything within the $_SERVER > variable > we then decode it in the App > > It gives us everything shown in the

Re: LiveCode Server

2019-10-17 Thread Lagi Pittas via use-livecode
HI Ralph Basically the server script does this put arrayEncode($_SERVER) and sends back everything within the $_SERVER variable we then decode it in the App It gives us everything shown in the documentation but not the header info - GATEWAY_INTERFACE - SERVER_ADDR - SERVER_NAME

Re: LiveCode Server

2019-10-17 Thread Ralf Bitter via use-livecode
> On 17. Oct 2019, at 17:24, Lagi Pittas via use-livecode > wrote: > > There is no $_SERVER["HTTP_Authorization"] in the docs the closest is > $_SERVER["HTTP] but since > the code gives an error and the return is empty it's a moot point. Lagi, the original question was: > how to read an

Re: LiveCode Server

2019-10-17 Thread Lagi Pittas via use-livecode
t; > > Hi Ralf, > > > > The problem isn't the sending of the headers but reading them using > > livecode server. > > We are using Linux servers so the Mac problem is not an issue. > > > > Via PHP the call is get_headers ( string $url [, int $format = 0 [,

Re: LiveCode Server

2019-10-17 Thread Ralf Bitter via use-livecode
te: > > Hi Ralf, > > The problem isn't the sending of the headers but reading them using > livecode server. > We are using Linux servers so the Mac problem is not an issue. > > Via PHP the call is get_headers ( string $url [, int $format = 0 [, > resource $context ]] ) : a

Re: LiveCode Server

2019-10-17 Thread Lagi Pittas via use-livecode
Hi Ralf, The problem isn't the sending of the headers but reading them using livecode server. We are using Linux servers so the Mac problem is not an issue. Via PHP the call is get_headers ( string $url [, int $format = 0 [, resource $context ]] ) : array Basically is there a way of doing

Re: LiveCode Server

2019-10-17 Thread Ralf Bitter via use-livecode
Todd, sending Authorization HTTP request headers to LC server on Linux should work. I have troubles with request headers too, but only on Mac OS. Ralf > On 17. Oct 2019, at 13:56, Todd Fabacher via use-livecode > wrote: > > Hello all, > > We are running LC Server Scripts to process some

LiveCode Server

2019-10-17 Thread Todd Fabacher via use-livecode
Hello all, We are running LC Server Scripts to process some DB request and we want to do basic validation by passing a token from the App to the server script. The problem is I can not find where I can get the headers on the server. I looked in $_SERVER, but not there. I see the CONTENT_TYPE and

Re: "do as 'LiveCode Server'"?

2019-04-23 Thread Sannyasin Brahmanathaswami via use-livecode
Agreed that this would have "serious" positive benefits. I imagine at least one use case where input at the UX/UI level would fork the "narrative" response from your script in different directions. It would be so easy to write! BR Richard Gaskin You can write:

"do as 'LiveCode Server'"?

2019-04-22 Thread Richard Gaskin via use-livecode
. However, LiveCode Server has no such limitation. You can write: Here's some text Here's some other text It would be ideal to have the merge function outfitted with this sort of logic handling, but there may be backwards-compatibility issues I'm not thinking of. So maybe at a minimum we

Re: Thoughts on Livecode Server

2019-01-24 Thread Richard Gaskin via use-livecode
t, and load whatever node modules > we want to do their thing in Javascript = Livecode server extensions > written in Javascript. > > Based on your feedback that we can use "the template xxx" or a stack > with a widget and execute these in the server environment - the > t

Re: Thoughts on Livecode Server

2019-01-24 Thread David Bovill via use-livecode
Thanks for the time replying Richard! Let me outline where a bit the context of my questions. It's not about the basics of how to rn a server / cgi. It's about the relatively long term direction of server technology and Livecode server. I'm interested to experiment with Livecode server again as i

Re: Thoughts on Livecode Server

2019-01-23 Thread Richard Gaskin via use-livecode
David Bovill wrote: > Does anyone have any thoughts on where Livecode server should go / is > going? So far it goes wherever I take it, so I haven't given much thought beyond one enhancement request for init optimization (useful for CGI, will make no difference for any use as a pers

Thoughts on Livecode Server

2019-01-22 Thread David Bovill via use-livecode
Does anyone have any thoughts on where Livecode server should go / is going? I thought I'd throw out a few things that have been on my mind to see what other people are thinking and where the actual underlying technology is heading. Context - I use Livecode server and Revigniter

RE: Livecode Server Post

2019-01-11 Thread Ralph DiMola via use-livecode
9 2:39 AM To: How to use LiveCode Cc: Matthias Rebbe Subject: Re: Livecode Server Post Hi Ralph, i tried here now in the message box with the following lc server script " put "this is the posted value for test:" put "" put $_POST["test"] ?> TIO On-Rev Com

  1   2   3   4   5   6   >