On 07/30/2017 04:42 PM, hh via use-livecode wrote:
Let me explain that a bit simpler for readers who don't know or forgot
linear/matrix algebra.
Thanks. That does make sense, and I did indeed need a refresher course.
--
Mark Wieder
ahsoftw...@gmail.com
I noticed the announcement of your conference
in Livecode website:
https://livecode.com/global/hermann-hoch/
Have you checked Jim Hurley stacks?
http://jamesphurley.com/Revolution.html
Al
> These were the first two minutes of my talk
> at LC Global in Nov 2017.Now I can start after that,
>
Hi Al.
Yes. I saw this mistake several times. The misleading thing is, TMHO,
the name "transformation matrix" for [a,b,c,d,e,f] (because the listing
is pairwise for columns, as you now describe, and not for rows).
Let me explain that a bit simpler for readers who don't know or forgot
Hi Hermann,
Hermann wrote:
> This is not a bug, your script is wrong.
> If TM is a,b,c,d,e,f then you have to d
> put item 1 of pArgs into tMatrix[0,0]
> put item 2 of pArgs into tMatrix[1,0]
> put item 3 of pArgs into tMatrix[0,1]
> put item 4 of pArgs into tMatrix[1,1]
> this yields
Al, your script is wrong. You are building the matrix in a wrong way.
It is no bug! With your 'workaround' you point yourself to the lines
where you did make the mistake.
http://lists.runrev.com/pipermail/use-livecode/2017-July/240074.html
___
Hi Al.
This is not a bug, your script is wrong.
If TM is a,b,c,d,e,f then you have to do
put item 1 of pArgs into tMatrix[0,0]
put item 2 of pArgs into tMatrix[1,0]
put item 3 of pArgs into tMatrix[0,1]
put item 4 of pArgs into tMatrix[1,1]
this yields correct results.
[In fact
