I like Parallels, especially because it is capable of creating multiple network
adapters and assigning a real adapter to it very easily. This would allow you
to connect a server to two different networks for example. It's entirely
possible to set up a virtual software router like that. I now
jvalle wrote:
starting with an old Macbook would like to know your expert opinion about what
is the best virtualization solution to run Windows on Mac, from a developer
point of view.
With any VM the key is RAM. The more the merrier. Anything less than
2GB will make VMs really difficult to
Richard,
VirtualBox was mentioned at least 3 times. I like Parallels too, but I like
VirtualBox just as much feature-wise and it beats Parallels because of the
price.
I agree that a PC might be a better solution, but it isn't always possible to
fit a PC in your backpack :-)
--
Best regards,
Aye. Where virtualization really begins to pay off for me is running multiple
vm's on a single hardware platform, or else the convenience of having several
operating systems at my fingertips at once. As an IT manager that has really
been a huge boon for me. I should also mention that in a
On Mon, Jan 2, 2012 at 8:45 AM, jva...@1234web.net wrote:
Hello,
starting with an old Macbook would like to know your expert opinion about
what
is the best virtualization solution to run Windows on Mac, from a developer
point of view.
Thanks and Happy New Year
--
Jose
If the Mac is
If not, VMware Fusion is very good, and also Parallels Desktop for
Mac.
Just FYI, I've read a ton of comparisons on these two, and own both, and over
the last year or two, Parallels has always come out ahead of VMWare in the
published reviews. I can back that up with personal experience,
Virtualbox works always as expected in about apps or web apps testing tasks.
Le 2 janv. 2012 à 14:45, jva...@1234web.net a écrit :
Hello,
starting with an old Macbook would like to know your expert opinion about what
is the best virtualization solution to run Windows on Mac, from a
