Re: OFF TOPIC virtualize windows on mac

2012-01-03 Thread Bob Sneidar
I like Parallels, especially because it is capable of creating multiple network 
adapters and assigning a real adapter to it very easily. This would allow you 
to connect a server to two different networks for example. It's entirely 
possible to set up a virtual software router like that. I now have all my 
Windows Servers running in Parallels VM's on a couple of Intel Apple Servers. 
The main thing to keep in mind is system resources. Make sure you have plenty 
of memory and drive space. Creating fixed (not expanding) virtual drives is 
recommended as well. Also, if running Active Directory in a replication 
environment, disable the snapshots feature on both the replica and the master. 
Restoring a snapshot in this scenario will create a syncing issue called a USN 
rollback between the replica and the master which is not easy to resolve. Some 
say it is impossible, but I have recovered before. 

Bob


On Jan 2, 2012, at 5:45 AM, jva...@1234web.net wrote:

 Hello,
 
 starting with an old Macbook would like to know your expert opinion about what
 is the best virtualization solution to run Windows on Mac, from a developer
 point of view.
 
 Thanks and Happy New Year
 -- 
 Jose
 
 ___
 use-livecode mailing list
 use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
 Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
 preferences:
 http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode


___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode


Re: OFF TOPIC virtualize windows on mac

2012-01-03 Thread Richard Gaskin

jvalle wrote:

starting with an old Macbook would like to know your expert opinion about what
is the best virtualization solution to run Windows on Mac, from a developer
point of view.


With any VM the key is RAM.  The more the merrier.  Anything less than 
2GB will make VMs really difficult to work with.


I'm surprised no one here has mentioned VirtualBox:
https://www.virtualbox.org/

I'd used Parallels for years, even met the devs at a MacTech conference 
and have been very impressed.  But then Mark Wieder suggested I try 
VirtualBox, and in my experience it loads VMs from a saved state so much 
faster than Parallels that I've switched all my VMs to it.


Extra bonus points:  it's free an open source, so you can try it out at 
no cost, and if it doesn't do what you need you'll lose nothing.


But I'd be surprised if you weren't impressed with it.  VirtualBox may 
not have all of the features of Parallels, but with the shared 
Clipboard, shared folders, and so many other useful options I've found 
it very satisfying.  And the performance has been pretty much unmatched 
on the three machines I use it on (Mac Mini, MacBook Pro, and Dell laptop).


Since this is an older Mac, if RAM is scarce you might consider picking 
up a used PC from Craig's List or Ebay.  I've bought quite a few 
computers through each, and have saved a great deal of money.


And if you've been curious about learning more on the hardware side of 
things, building your own PC can save you even more.


Consider this DIY rig from NewEgg:
http://www.newegg.com/Product/ComboBundleDetails.aspx?ItemList=Combo.752616

A Sandy Bridge CPU in an expandable case for just $188.  Add a hard 
drive and you're good to go with a fairly nice little system.


Heck, that's pretty much the cost of Parallels, and you get an whole 
computer instead. :)


--
 Richard Gaskin
 Fourth World
 LiveCode training and consulting: http://www.fourthworld.com
 Webzine for LiveCode developers: http://www.LiveCodeJournal.com
 LiveCode Journal blog: http://LiveCodejournal.com/blog.irv

___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode


Re: OFF TOPIC virtualize windows on mac

2012-01-03 Thread Mark Schonewille
Richard,

VirtualBox was mentioned at least 3 times. I like Parallels too, but I like 
VirtualBox just as much feature-wise and it beats Parallels because of the 
price.

I agree that a PC might be a better solution, but it isn't always possible to 
fit a PC in your backpack :-)

--
Best regards,

Mark Schonewille

Economy-x-Talk Consulting and Software Engineering
Homepage: http://economy-x-talk.com
Twitter: http://twitter.com/xtalkprogrammer
KvK: 50277553

Become our partner in sales http://qery.us/1bq Start selling Color Converter 
today. 20% commission!

On 3 jan 2012, at 18:59, Richard Gaskin wrote:

 jvalle wrote:
 starting with an old Macbook would like to know your expert opinion about 
 what
 is the best virtualization solution to run Windows on Mac, from a developer
 point of view.
 
 With any VM the key is RAM.  The more the merrier.  Anything less than 2GB 
 will make VMs really difficult to work with.
 
 I'm surprised no one here has mentioned VirtualBox:
 https://www.virtualbox.org/
 
 I'd used Parallels for years, even met the devs at a MacTech conference and 
 have been very impressed.  But then Mark Wieder suggested I try VirtualBox, 
 and in my experience it loads VMs from a saved state so much faster than 
 Parallels that I've switched all my VMs to it.
 
 Extra bonus points:  it's free an open source, so you can try it out at no 
 cost, and if it doesn't do what you need you'll lose nothing.
 
 But I'd be surprised if you weren't impressed with it.  VirtualBox may not 
 have all of the features of Parallels, but with the shared Clipboard, shared 
 folders, and so many other useful options I've found it very satisfying.  And 
 the performance has been pretty much unmatched on the three machines I use it 
 on (Mac Mini, MacBook Pro, and Dell laptop).
 
 Since this is an older Mac, if RAM is scarce you might consider picking up a 
 used PC from Craig's List or Ebay.  I've bought quite a few computers through 
 each, and have saved a great deal of money.
 
 And if you've been curious about learning more on the hardware side of 
 things, building your own PC can save you even more.
 
 Consider this DIY rig from NewEgg:
 http://www.newegg.com/Product/ComboBundleDetails.aspx?ItemList=Combo.752616
 
 A Sandy Bridge CPU in an expandable case for just $188.  Add a hard drive and 
 you're good to go with a fairly nice little system.
 
 Heck, that's pretty much the cost of Parallels, and you get an whole computer 
 instead. :)


___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode


Re: OFF TOPIC virtualize windows on mac

2012-01-03 Thread Bob Sneidar
Aye. Where virtualization really begins to pay off for me is running multiple 
vm's on a single hardware platform, or else the convenience of having several 
operating systems at my fingertips at once. As an IT manager that has really 
been a huge boon for me. I should also mention that in a Windows dominated 
environment, it is a great way to introduce the MAC OS without others thinking 
you are trying to take over the world, which of course I really am, but no one 
needs to know that just yet. Otherwise I agree totally that for a single vm, 
why not just have a computer for that? 

Bob


On Jan 3, 2012, at 9:59 AM, Richard Gaskin wrote:

 And if you've been curious about learning more on the hardware side of 
 things, building your own PC can save you even more.
 
 Consider this DIY rig from NewEgg:
 http://www.newegg.com/Product/ComboBundleDetails.aspx?ItemList=Combo.752616
 
 A Sandy Bridge CPU in an expandable case for just $188.  Add a hard drive and 
 you're good to go with a fairly nice little system.
 
 Heck, that's pretty much the cost of Parallels, and you get an whole computer 
 instead. :)
 
 --
 Richard Gaskin
 Fourth World
 LiveCode training and consulting: http://www.fourthworld.com
 Webzine for LiveCode developers: http://www.LiveCodeJournal.com
 LiveCode Journal blog: http://LiveCodejournal.com/blog.irv


___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode


Re: OFF TOPIC virtualize windows on mac

2012-01-02 Thread Roger Eller
On Mon, Jan 2, 2012 at 8:45 AM, jva...@1234web.net wrote:

 Hello,

 starting with an old Macbook would like to know your expert opinion about
 what
 is the best virtualization solution to run Windows on Mac, from a developer
 point of view.

 Thanks and Happy New Year
 --
 Jose


If the Mac is PPC rather than intel, then I wouldn't recommend
virtialization as it would be 'emulation', which is unproductively slow.
 You would be better off buying a low-end PC.  However, if the Mac has an
intel cpu, then start with the FREE Virtualbox, and see if it meets your
needs.  If not, VMware Fusion is very good, and also Parallels Desktop for
Mac.  If intel, and your OS is at least Leopard, SnowLeo, or Lion, you
could install Windows using BootCamp (in Utililies).  This would allow you
to boot natively in Windows, and would be as close to the real thing as you
can get while using Apple hardware.

https://www.virtualbox.org/wiki/Downloads
https://www.vmware.com/tryvmware/
http://www.parallels.com/download/
http://support.apple.com/kb/HT3986

˜Roger
___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode


Re: OFF TOPIC virtualize windows on mac

2012-01-02 Thread Ken Ray

 If not, VMware Fusion is very good, and also Parallels Desktop for
 Mac.  

Just FYI, I've read a ton of comparisons on these two, and own both, and over 
the last year or two, Parallels has always come out ahead of VMWare in the 
published reviews. I can back that up with personal experience, too. That said, 
I wouldn't be surprised if VMWare jumps ahead of Parallels this year and the 
two get into a leap frog contest, but either one is great for virtualization, 
IMHO.

Ken Ray
Sons of Thunder Software, Inc.
Email: k...@sonsothunder.com
Web Site: http://www.sonsothunder.com/  

___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode


Re: OFF TOPIC virtualize windows on mac

2012-01-02 Thread Pierre Sahores
Virtualbox works always as expected in about apps or web apps testing tasks. 

Le 2 janv. 2012 à 14:45, jva...@1234web.net a écrit :

 Hello,
 
 starting with an old Macbook would like to know your expert opinion about what
 is the best virtualization solution to run Windows on Mac, from a developer
 point of view.
 
 Thanks and Happy New Year
 -- 
 Jose
 
 ___
 use-livecode mailing list
 use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
 Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
 preferences:
 http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode

--
Pierre Sahores
mobile : 06 03 95 77 70
www.sahores-conseil.com




___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode