Re: Saving script-only stacks

Thanks > On 13 Sep 2016, at 7:40 AM, J. Landman Gay wrote: > > On 9/12/16 4:17 PM, Monte Goulding wrote: >> Everything needs a report so it can be tracked for testing. > > http://quality.livecode.com/show_bug.cgi?id=18375 > > -- > Jacqueline Landman Gay |

Re: Saving script-only stacks

On 9/12/16 4:17 PM, Monte Goulding wrote: Everything needs a report so it can be tracked for testing. http://quality.livecode.com/show_bug.cgi?id=18375 -- Jacqueline Landman Gay | jac...@hyperactivesw.com HyperActive Software | http://www.hyperactivesw.com

Re: Saving script-only stacks

Everything needs a report so it can be tracked for testing. Sent from my iPhone > On 13 Sep 2016, at 7:07 AM, J. Landman Gay wrote: > > I didn't open a report, I thought the behavior was either intentional or > unavoidable. If you're submitting a fix anyway, probably

Re: Saving script-only stacks

On 9/12/16 3:43 PM, Monte Goulding wrote: I was pretty certain we had identified and sorted that out but I can see we haven’t. Have you opened a report? It’s a fairly easy fix which I’ll submit today for 8.1.1 RC 1. I didn't open a report, I thought the behavior was either intentional or

Re: Saving script-only stacks

> On 13 Sep 2016, at 6:29 AM, J. Landman Gay wrote: > >> Actually this should be resolved in RC 2. I presume you are still seeing it >> there? > > Yup. Sorry Jacque I was pretty certain we had identified and sorted that out but I can see we haven’t. Have you

Re: Saving script-only stacks

On 9/12/16 3:20 PM, Monte Goulding wrote: Actually this should be resolved in RC 2. I presume you are still seeing it there? Yup. -- Jacqueline Landman Gay | jac...@hyperactivesw.com HyperActive Software | http://www.hyperactivesw.com

Re: Saving script-only stacks

Actually this should be resolved in RC 2. I presume you are still seeing it there? Sent from my iPhone > On 13 Sep 2016, at 6:01 AM, J. Landman Gay wrote: > > Or I could just live with it. ___ use-livecode mailing list