Re: Scanning for inclusions

2017-04-29 Thread Sannyasin Brahmanathaswami via use-livecode
Bill wrote: "For me, it's a pain point because when I try to build a standalone and I don't have one of the widgets linked, I only get a message saying "module not found" or something like that. " I think it is actually worse than that. I'm bleary eyed from pushing so many builds these past

Re: Scanning for inclusions

2017-04-28 Thread Richard Gaskin via use-livecode
William Prothero wrote: >> On Apr 28, 2017, at 8:30 PM, Richard Gaskin wrote: >> >> Why is this such an ongoing pain point? >> >> How are dependencies handles in other systems? > > > Richard, > For me, it's a pain point because when I try to build a standalone > and I don't have one of the

Re: Scanning for inclusions

2017-04-28 Thread prothero--- via use-livecode
Richard, For me, it's a pain point because when I try to build a standalone and I don't have one of the widgets linked, I only get a message saying "module not found" or something like that. Seems it would be easy to notify the name of the in-found module. Best, Bill William Prothero

Re: Scanning for inclusions

2017-04-28 Thread Richard Gaskin via use-livecode
Why is this such an ongoing pain point? How are dependencies handles in other systems? -- Richard Gaskin Fourth World Systems Software Design and Development for the Desktop, Mobile, and the Web ambassa...@fourthworld.com

Re: Scanning for inclusions

2017-04-28 Thread Sannyasin Brahmanathaswami via use-livecode
Mike K. wrote: I thought once you ran it once, when you switch to manual, the auto-selected ones stay. hhm… that would be nice… easy to test.. stand by (time passes here) Nope, no go… Test one: 1) go to SA settings-> inclusions uncheck widgets headerbar and switch button # which

Re: Scanning for inclusions

2017-04-28 Thread Mike Kerner via use-livecode
I thought once you ran it once, when you switch to manual, the auto-selected ones stay. On Fri, Apr 28, 2017 at 12:27 AM, Sannyasin Brahmanathaswami via use-livecode wrote: > Is there a way to run the "scan for inclusions" required and get a list. > > Waiting for