On 29/04/2019 07:12, Dar Scott Consulting via use-livecode wrote:
I'm not sure what C is. Maybe something related to using arrays. Maybe a tool
to create code snippets.
Ah, OK, got it.
I do already have a handler that will "save" the current graph; i.e.
write out the JSON of the defining
I'm not sure what C is. Maybe something related to using arrays. Maybe a tool
to create code snippets.
> On Apr 25, 2019, at 2:25 PM, Alex Tweedly via use-livecode
> wrote:
>
> Sorry, but .. what is C ?
>
> Current plan is kind of B- i.e. the default is to try to apply some
>
On 26/04/2019 00:27, Quentin Long via use-livecode wrote:
Hmmm… Seems like this library is intended for a summat limited subset of graph-styles.
There are pie charts, radar charts, etc ad nauseum, and it's not clear to me how this
library caan cope with any of those "non-standard" types of
Hmmm… Seems like this library is intended for a summat limited subset of
graph-styles. There are pie charts, radar charts, etc ad nauseum, and it's not
clear to me how this library caan cope with any of those "non-standard" types
of graph. As well, it's unclear to me how this library will deal
On 25/04/2019 19:07, Dar Scott Consulting via use-livecode wrote:
I like the use of an array.
Add the ability to set the default array, allowing named arrays. Or supply base
arrays that one could use to make a plot parameter array.
Yeah, it should be easy and potentially useful to have some
Sorry, but .. what is C ?
Current plan is kind of B- i.e. the default is to try to apply
some simple guesswork to make a "reasonable" looking result, but with a
simple way (e.g. put TRUE into myArray["NoGuessing"] ) to prevent any
such attempt and ave a minimal, undecorated graph.
--
Coming in late...
For bread-and-butter code, B.
For software development, A.
But, really, my response is C.
Dar
> On Apr 23, 2019, at 5:01 PM, Alex Tweedly via use-livecode
> wrote:
>
> Hi folks,
>
> I'm building a library (which I plan to release as Open Source), and I'm
> having
I like the use of an array.
Add the ability to set the default array, allowing named arrays. Or supply base
arrays that one could use to make a plot parameter array.
--
Dar Scott
Mad Scientist
darzLab
> On Apr 23, 2019, at 9:00 PM, Richard Gaskin via use-livecode
> wrote:
>
> Using named
I did really well - I got two typos into a very short example ... the
description shoudl have said lineDel, not itemDel, and it should have
been set to ":", not ";"
My fault for taking the *real* example out of the demo app, and cutting
it down while typing the email.
itemDel and lineDel
On 4/24/19 5:47 PM, Alex Tweedly via use-livecode wrote:
1a. same thing, using the itemDel feature.
put ";" into sA["lineDel"]
put "1:2:4:8:16:15:14:13:12:22:17:15" into temp
put temp into sA["data"][1]["values"]
gmMakeGraph the long id of grp "mycanvas", sA
Are itemDel and lineDel synonyms?
On 4/24/19 5:47 PM, Alex Tweedly via use-livecode wrote:
I've pretty much decided to take Mark's and Bob's suggestion - but in
reverse :-)
:-P
--
Mark Wieder
ahsoftw...@gmail.com
___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Thanks everyone for great feedback and suggestions.
Below I've included the current summary specs; currently this is all
pretty much working, except for
titles (which I just haven't done yet :-), and a few minor tweaks to
handle improvements I've added to the spec from reading the "R" docs
For clarification, when I said “many kinds” in my previous post, I meant to be
referring to the kinds of plots, not the symbol for the data.
Best,
Bill
William Prothero
http://es.earthednet.org
> On Apr 24, 2019, at 6:54 AM, prothero--- via use-livecode
> wrote:
>
> Alex,
> A great idea! I
Alex,
A great idea! I do a lot of plotting and would find this kind of library very
useful. I would need it to be able to determine some reasonable default values
for plot axes, but also to be able to set them. The plot label and axis labels
need to be settable. Also, there could be histogram
R is among the world's most popular tools for this. When in doubt,
following their proven popular designs would seem a good bet.
R's plot function is a thing of beauty.
Their default is to produce the most commonly-used result. You can even
pass nothing but data to it and get a very useful
On 4/23/19 4:19 PM, Bob Sneidar via use-livecode wrote:
My thinking is to ask what visual impact if any would having the extra
attributes have? Is there a scenario where the graphs would be created so small
that the extras would be visually unappealing? Also, I think less to start with
is
interesting thread. sounds like a useful library. * watching * thanks Alex
On Tue, Apr 23, 2019 at 7:19 PM Bob Sneidar via use-livecode <
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com> wrote:
> My thinking is to ask what visual impact if any would having the extra
> attributes have? Is there a scenario where
My thinking is to ask what visual impact if any would having the extra
attributes have? Is there a scenario where the graphs would be created so small
that the extras would be visually unappealing? Also, I think less to start with
is better, because adding more features makes the end user feel
18 matches
Mail list logo
