Not portative or portable, but something I'm bl**dy proud of as
I worked the thing out in about 30 minutes during a lunchbreak:
http://forums.livecode.com/viewtopic.php?f=10=30295
Richmond.
___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Me too.
Graham
> On 12 Dec 2017, at 12:10, Keith Martin via use-livecode
> wrote:
>
> On 12 Dec 2017, at 11:05, Richmond Mathewson via use-livecode wrote:
>
>> One of the reasons why videoClip and AudioClip are useful
>> is to do with portativity.
>
> This is
I misread portativity too but they're similar anyway. It isn't hard to
store the video as a custom property, write it to the temp folder on
demand, and assign a player to that filename. Later just delete the temp file.
I've done this and it works fine.
--
Jacqueline Landman Gay |
On 2017-12-12 12:24, Mark Waddingham via use-livecode wrote:
On 2017-12-12 12:05, Richmond Mathewson via use-livecode wrote:
One of the reasons why videoClip and AudioClip are useful
is to do with portativity.
That would be true - if playing a videoclip didn't use a temporary
player object
On 2017-12-12 12:05, Richmond Mathewson via use-livecode wrote:
One of the reasons why videoClip and AudioClip are useful
is to do with portativity.
That would be true - if playing a videoclip didn't use a temporary
player object 'under the hood' - i.e. you get no more with using
videoclips
On 12 Dec 2017, at 11:05, Richmond Mathewson via use-livecode wrote:
One of the reasons why videoClip and AudioClip are useful
is to do with portativity.
This is a VERY good reason to support this properly. I still find it
frankly weird that LC isn't able to handle MP3 media more flexibly
One of the reasons why videoClip and AudioClip are useful
is to do with portativity.
Richmond.
On 12/12/17 1:02 pm, panagiotis merakos via use-livecode wrote:
I guess the reason for that is that you can do waaay more stuff with the
player object, so this bug is not of very high priority.
On
I guess the reason for that is that you can do waaay more stuff with the
player object, so this bug is not of very high priority.
On Tue, Dec 12, 2017 at 10:59 AM, Richmond Mathewson via use-livecode <
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com> wrote:
> That bug has been sitting around, unsorted-out
> for a
That bug has been sitting around, unsorted-out
for a very long time.
Um?
Richmond.
On 12/12/17 12:47 pm, panagiotis merakos via use-livecode wrote:
Hi Richmond,
You are affected by this bug:
http://quality.livecode.com/show_bug.cgi?id=13951
I suggest using a player instead. The "play
Thank you, Panos,
although when I first read your message I read it as:
"You are infected by this bug:''
Richmond.
On 12/12/17 12:47 pm, panagiotis merakos via use-livecode wrote:
Hi Richmond,
You are affected by this bug:
http://quality.livecode.com/show_bug.cgi?id=13951
I suggest using a
Hi Richmond,
You are affected by this bug:
http://quality.livecode.com/show_bug.cgi?id=13951
I suggest using a player instead. The "play audioclip/videoclip .." syntax
does not support a lot of multimedia formats.
Best,
Panos
--
On Tue, Dec 12, 2017 at 10:40 AM, Richmond Mathewson via
11 matches
Mail list logo