Re: videoClip

2017-12-13 Thread Richmond Mathewson via use-livecode
Not portative or portable, but something I'm bl**dy proud of as I worked the thing out in about 30 minutes during a lunchbreak: http://forums.livecode.com/viewtopic.php?f=10=30295 Richmond. ___ use-livecode mailing list use-livecode@lists.runrev.com

Re: videoClip

2017-12-12 Thread Graham Samuel via use-livecode
Me too. Graham > On 12 Dec 2017, at 12:10, Keith Martin via use-livecode > wrote: > > On 12 Dec 2017, at 11:05, Richmond Mathewson via use-livecode wrote: > >> One of the reasons why videoClip and AudioClip are useful >> is to do with portativity. > > This is

Re: videoClip

2017-12-12 Thread J. Landman Gay via use-livecode
I misread portativity too but they're similar anyway. It isn't hard to store the video as a custom property, write it to the temp folder on demand, and assign a player to that filename. Later just delete the temp file. I've done this and it works fine. -- Jacqueline Landman Gay |

Re: videoClip

2017-12-12 Thread Mark Waddingham via use-livecode
On 2017-12-12 12:24, Mark Waddingham via use-livecode wrote: On 2017-12-12 12:05, Richmond Mathewson via use-livecode wrote: One of the reasons why videoClip and AudioClip are useful is to do with portativity. That would be true - if playing a videoclip didn't use a temporary player object

Re: videoClip

2017-12-12 Thread Mark Waddingham via use-livecode
On 2017-12-12 12:05, Richmond Mathewson via use-livecode wrote: One of the reasons why videoClip and AudioClip are useful is to do with portativity. That would be true - if playing a videoclip didn't use a temporary player object 'under the hood' - i.e. you get no more with using videoclips

Re: videoClip

2017-12-12 Thread Keith Martin via use-livecode
On 12 Dec 2017, at 11:05, Richmond Mathewson via use-livecode wrote: One of the reasons why videoClip and AudioClip are useful is to do with portativity. This is a VERY good reason to support this properly. I still find it frankly weird that LC isn't able to handle MP3 media more flexibly

Re: videoClip

2017-12-12 Thread Richmond Mathewson via use-livecode
One of the reasons why videoClip and AudioClip are useful is to do with portativity. Richmond. On 12/12/17 1:02 pm, panagiotis merakos via use-livecode wrote: I guess the reason for that is that you can do waaay more stuff with the player object, so this bug is not of very high priority. On

Re: videoClip

2017-12-12 Thread panagiotis merakos via use-livecode
I guess the reason for that is that you can do waaay more stuff with the player object, so this bug is not of very high priority. On Tue, Dec 12, 2017 at 10:59 AM, Richmond Mathewson via use-livecode < use-livecode@lists.runrev.com> wrote: > That bug has been sitting around, unsorted-out > for a

Re: videoClip

2017-12-12 Thread Richmond Mathewson via use-livecode
That bug has been sitting around, unsorted-out for a very long time. Um? Richmond. On 12/12/17 12:47 pm, panagiotis merakos via use-livecode wrote: Hi Richmond, You are affected by this bug: http://quality.livecode.com/show_bug.cgi?id=13951 I suggest using a player instead. The "play

Re: videoClip

2017-12-12 Thread Richmond Mathewson via use-livecode
Thank you, Panos, although when I first read your message I read it as: "You are infected by this bug:'' Richmond. On 12/12/17 12:47 pm, panagiotis merakos via use-livecode wrote: Hi Richmond, You are affected by this bug: http://quality.livecode.com/show_bug.cgi?id=13951 I suggest using a

Re: videoClip

2017-12-12 Thread panagiotis merakos via use-livecode
Hi Richmond, You are affected by this bug: http://quality.livecode.com/show_bug.cgi?id=13951 I suggest using a player instead. The "play audioclip/videoclip .." syntax does not support a lot of multimedia formats. Best, Panos -- On Tue, Dec 12, 2017 at 10:40 AM, Richmond Mathewson via