Howdy,
Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2004 20:09:37 -0600
From: J. Landman Gay [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Scrolling a Card?
On 2/20/04 5:53 PM, Christopher Mitchell wrote:
Could you please explain under what circumstances this handler would
require to be explicitly declared? This seems like
Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2004 00:28:38 -0700
From: Dar Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Scrolling a Card?
Are you setting the scroll on
the card group?
---
Yep. A map with both scrollbars and a grab ability is the model I'm looking
for. Gives the user more options, i.e., all-axis fine
Ah, thanks, Ken... yes this is what I was asking about. Makes sense
but is not something I would have thought about, and a few cycles
beyond me at this point. Something to archive for the future. :)_~
Yours,
Chris
On Feb 21, 2004, at 2:19 AM, Ken Norris wrote:
Howdy,
Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2004
Howdy,
Another likely simple question for which the specific documentation
does not seem readily available, or at least accessible. Hopefully
someday other newbies will benefit from all these syntax questions and
you all won't tar and feather me just yet. I feel like I've been
spamming the
Hi Christopher,
Klaus,
Could you please explain under what circumstances this handler would
require
to be explicitly declared? This seems like something implicit to the
engine, and
if not handled reliably then how many other things need to be
re-defined?
Looks like this has been carefully
Hi Ken,
Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2004 00:28:38 -0700
From: Dar Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Scrolling a Card?
Are you setting the scroll on
the card group?
---
Yep. A map with both scrollbars and a grab ability is the model I'm
looking
for. Gives the user more options, i.e., all-axis
Christopher,
The name of your graphic pointer is: pointer1 It's NOT pointer1
(with the double quotes). In your lone set statement, the quotes merely
tell the engine that what's enclosed (withing the quotes) should be
treated (or looked upon) as a literal string and NOT a
Opie,
Thanks for the reply. well, yes, you're right that this works - and I
would have sworn I had tried it, but I guess the confusion stems from
the fact that in my regular format I have to use the quotes. So I must
have just been loading the variable wrong earlier when I was doing it
Opie,
I think the thing that confused me from the beginning and caused me to
use that variable was that putting in :
repeat with i = 1 to 3
set the angle of graphic pointer i to rotAngle
end repeat
returns an error in the script debugger of type: set, missing 'to'
so by putting
Hi Christopher,
have you tried:
repeat with i = 1 to 3
set the angle of graphic (pointeri) to rotAngle
end repeat
Best,
malte
___
use-revolution mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
Hi Developers,
I have been working hard to employ
the method post for uploading
files to a web server.
I have used HTTP interceptor v1.3
to check the differences between the
data send by browsers and RR/MC.
These are the results:
Http headers send from Netscape:
POST /cgi-bin/upload.cgi
Content-type: multipart/form-data;
boundary=---277072699622422
you're forgetting the boundary marker.. (note that the above is all
one line, or two seperate lines with LWS before the word boundary)
-Sean
___
use-revolution
Honestly, there is no compile time I am refering to as the script is being parsed.
Basically I am looking fo a set of parse directives. It seems that there must be a
API from inside Revolution to load and parse a module. I mean it does so already
from distrubition builder. I just want to
Christopher,
Actually, Malte also responded with the corrected shorter version and
he is correct. My bad, in my zeal to explain the difference between a
quoted literal string and the actual object name, I overlooked the
fundamental syntax of what I sent!! SORRY!!
In the example I sent,
On Saturday, February 21, 2004, at 09:41 AM, Kevin wrote:
Honestly, there is no compile time I am refering to as the script is
being parsed. Basically I am looking fo a set of parse directives.
It seems that there must be a API from inside Revolution to load and
parse a module. I mean it
GEEZ!! I did it again!!! I said enclose pointer i in double
quotesthat's INCORRECT...I meant to say enclose pointer i in
PARENTHESES SORRY AGAIN FOR THE CONFUSION
Ops wrote:
Christopher,
Actually, Malte also responded with the corrected shorter version and
he is correct. My
On Fri, 20 Feb 2004 15:45:14 -0700, Rob Cozens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My approach is to load the entire text file into a library field when
changing languages, and to load that text field into a library local
variable when the library is put in use.
Each one-line message in the file is
So, when tha apply button is invoked the routines/interpreter that builds the tokens
has no parse directives? Are there no #if style constructs? I guess some
documentation on specifically how the compile/tokenization process occurs would be
helpful. Is the metacard/transcript compiler
For obvious reasons, the laser beam of a barcode scanner cannot read a
barcode that is displayed on your monitor. However, if the resolution of
the display is high enough to detect the differences in line-thickness of
each bar... Is it possible for Revolution to take a snapshot of a 1 pixel
TIL (Threaded Interpretive Languages) is a acronym that refers the languages like
Forth, Visual Basic and even SmalTalk/Java variations. Maybe this is a question I
should post to the Runtime Revolution support staff. I was under the impression from
the postings I have read that many of the
Hi Klaus,
Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2004 11:57:44 +0100
From: Klaus Major [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Scrolling a Card?
Let me see if i get you right...
You are faking a group with separate scrollbar-objects?
---
Nope. The group has normal scrollbars (checked in Inspector for the
I am currently using start using and insert the script of syntax and evaluating
the pros and cons of each. However, my question is one of larger scope I would like
to be able to extend the language/standard library itself. With many other languages
there exists a facilities to extend the
Just another small note. The start using syntax refers to a stack not a file
the stack must be in memory in my understanding. I would like to create a
#include that would solve these dependicies without developer/inteligent
intervention. Thus removing the most problematic variable from the
I have also looked into using several stacks written by Sweat Technologies AKS Charlie
Finley Script Browser and Script Library in hope if simplifying the inclusion madness.
___
Join Excite! - http://www.excite.com
The most personalized portal on the
on Sat, 21 Feb 2004 11:00:12 -0500
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Content-type: multipart/form-data;
boundary=---277072699622422
you're forgetting the boundary marker.. (note that
the above is all
one line, or two seperate lines with LWS before the
word boundary)
Thanks
Kevin-
I'm not sure where you're trying to go with this thread, but
Transcript by its nature extends the language as you go along. For
example, the Forth statement
: beeps 0 do beep loop ;
would be coded in Transcript as
on dots howMany
repeat with howMany
beep
end repeat
end dots
and
I am currently using start using and insert the script of
syntax and evaluating the pros and cons of each. However, my
question is one of larger scope I would like to be able to
extend the language/standard library itself. With many other
languages there exists a facilities to extend
repeat with i = 1 to 3
set the angle of graphic pointer i to rotAngle
end repeat
Personally, I like to wrap parentheses around this kind of construct to
make it easier to read:
repeat with i = 1 to 3
set the angle of graphic (pointer i) to rotAngle
end repeat
But whatever
Not wx? http://wxwindows.org/
regards,
Geoff Canyon
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Feb 14, 2004, at 9:08 PM, Alex Rice wrote:
If I were a C++ programmer, then Qt would be what I'd be using for a
GUI toolkit (if I could afford it).
___
use-revolution mailing
On Saturday, February 21, 2004, at 08:17 PM, Geoff Canyon wrote:
Not wx? http://wxwindows.org/
I'll mention it to my customer.
I tried to sell Revolution, but I kept getting responses like But Qt
has an openGL canvas!
Dar Scott
___
use-revolution
Someone may have addressed this already but I use X-assist to provide
the Applications menu and the OS9-type bring all that app's windows to
the front behavior. There is also a System Pref called ASM that does
this.
Regards,
Barry
On Feb 14, 2004, at 1:28 AM, Stephen Quinn Barncard
[EMAIL
I'm a bit lost as to where you're headed with this, but hopefully some
of this background helps:
* Transcript is compiled into bytecode when you save a script. It is
not purely interpreted- think Java (conceptually at least).
* The do command allows you to execute arbitrary scripts at runtime,
Alejandro,
Contact Dave Cragg about this. We've been working with him to do just
what you want in the last couple months.
-Chipp
___
use-revolution mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
33 matches
Mail list logo
