On 10/31/06 11:27 PM, "Dave Herndon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This has got me bugging. Two or three days now and I havent been able to
> bring up the VW window in debug mode. (v2.73) I am thinking of re-downloading
> rev to see if that helps. Any ideas? It just is no where to bee seen!
> W
I'm going to have to agree with Dave and Trevor. I've always thought
destroyStack comes into play only when closing stacks. If set to true, the
stack is purged from memory (usually). I pretty much always use an explicit
'delete stack "xyz"' when I want to make sure a mainstack is closed.
And like
type this in the message box (tools->message box)
put the visible of stack "revvariablewatcher"
put the visible of stack "revvariablewatcher"
--
hide stack "revvariablewatcher"
show stack "revvariablewatcher"
that should bring it back...
if it don't, type further in the msg box:
put the rect o
Hi Bridger,
No, it does NOT install the font permanently, only while the app is open.
-Chipp
On 11/1/06, Bridger Maxwell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Wow, that looks like the exact thing I was looking for. Just a question,
does it actually install the font? I don't mind it if does I guess, bu
I think Chipp has one (a plug-in thingy, I think).
http://www.altuit.com/
I wasn't able to quickly find it, but I could swear he had one...
HTH,
Judy
On Tue, 31 Oct 2006, Bridger Maxwell wrote:
> Hey,
> For a stack I am making, I have a very specific font that I am wanting to
> use, but it
This has got me bugging. Two or three days now and I havent been able to bring
up the VW window in debug mode. (v2.73) I am thinking of re-downloading rev to
see if that helps. Any ideas? It just is no where to bee seen! Wierd.
Dave
___
use-revolu
Ouch, what did I said at 4 AM waking up?!
I wrote a huge response for 2 hours... positive but giving away too many
hints...
Lets rewrite clearer... sorry for the offensive words this morning to the
better knowing...
What I mean is that you can use rev on the web but via cgi.
You can't manipulat
On Oct 31, 2006, at 5:39 PM, Sivakatirswami wrote:
OK let's try again with the right URL! (so far only one response.
Either
Rev users have no interest in the subject or QT really is
dead!)
Now, now QuickTime is far from dead. It has never had as large an
install base as it has today and i
Wow, that looks like the exact thing I was looking for. Just a question,
does it actually install the font? I don't mind it if does I guess, but
somehow it would be cooler if nothing was left on the users computer.
TTFN
Bridger
___
use-revolution
You could try here:
http://www.altuit.com/webs/altuit2/altFontCover/default.htm
Mark
On Oct 31, 2006, at 8:07 PM, Bridger Maxwell wrote:
Hey,
For a stack I am making, I have a very specific font that I am
wanting to
use, but it is not a font that would be one most people's
computers. Is
On 10/31/06 10:07 PM, "Bridger Maxwell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hey,
> For a stack I am making, I have a very specific font that I am wanting to
> use, but it is not a font that would be one most people's computers. Is
> there a way to install a font from within Revolution, or if possible,
Hey,
For a stack I am making, I have a very specific font that I am wanting to
use, but it is not a font that would be one most people's computers. Is
there a way to install a font from within Revolution, or if possible, use a
font that is not installed. This would be intended for Mac OSX and
W
Alright, I added the Enhancement Request #3940. Just don't mock me over
my amazingly poor writing skills. I'd like to put "Because it would be
really cool!", but I felt I had to justify the request.
So, if you want a Browser Control, then vote for bug 3940, and add your
own two cents if you
Dar Scott wrote:
I wanna learn about right-clicking an image!
Nothing to it. Choose any paint tool. Right-click an area inside an
image object. The area under the hotspot goes transparent.
--
Jacqueline Landman Gay | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
HyperActive Software | http://
On 10/31/06 9:01 PM, "Ken Ray" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 10/31/06 8:48 PM, "Richard Gaskin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> wouter wrote:
>>
>>> On Mac OS X (didn't test in OS 9) you can use the following
>>> to test for the visible of the menubar:
>>>
>>> put the menubar is not hidden
>>
By all means enter this feature request into the system and let us know the
link so we can "vote" for it. It's been discussed on the list before with
great passion, but I don't think it's made its way into BugZilla, and I
don't think anyone's working on it as a 3rd-party product.
"Derek Bump" <
offlist...
this has been requested since years (at least 5) continually.
unfortunately it's been ignored or put-off or you will get a marketing
lesson from those who think they know better in the mailist...
cheers
Xavier
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL P
On 10/31/06 8:48 PM, "Richard Gaskin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> wouter wrote:
>
>> On Mac OS X (didn't test in OS 9) you can use the following
>> to test for the visible of the menubar:
>>
>> put the menubar is not hidden
>> or
>> put the menubar is hidden
>
> "hidden"?
>
> Wow. Never woul
I just tried searching Bugzilla for anything related to an enhancement
request for a Web Browser Plugin that would allow Revolution Projects to
be viewed within Internet Explorer, Safari, Firefox and any other
browser out there. Sadly, I didn't see anything.
Has anyone requested this type of
wouter wrote:
On Mac OS X (didn't test in OS 9) you can use the following
to test for the visible of the menubar:
put the menubar is not hidden
or
put the menubar is hidden
"hidden"?
Wow. Never would have guessed that one.
Is that token used for any other element in the language?
I wonder
Hi,
On Mac OS X (didn't test in OS 9) you can use the following
to test for the visible of the menubar:
put the menubar is not hidden
or
put the menubar is hidden
Greetings,
Wouter
On 31 Oct 2006, at 21:05, David Bovill wrote:
How do you do that?
OK let's try again with the right URL! (so far only one response. Either
Rev users have no interest in the subject or QT really is
dead!)
-
To follow through on Stephan's proposal:
"I'm acquainted with a person in high management of Quicktime at Apple.
If someone can gather all the
On Oct 31, 2006, at 8:41 AM, Trevor Hopkins wrote:
I have a bunch of images in a stack. I noticed that if I right-
click on a part of the image, that area becomes transparent. Thats
great. However, if I go to another card and them come back, all of
those areas that I asked to become transpa
1. Would anyone recommend 3.0 over 4.0 (or vice versa?) for a web
server that will run Rev CGI scripts?
2. OT: Does anyone know of an honest, expert consultant who could
help us migrate from our present (dedicated) server to a new one?
Thanks!
___
Just to scrape the barrel
Watch out REV!
Some bigot may take exception to "get the globalloc" if they read it too fast!
Though I've never seen them glow.
Cheers, Barry
--
Funghetto o scherzetto? Gioca e vinci con Best Western! In palio o
put the editMenus of this stack
--
Economy-x-Talk
Consultancy and Software Engineering
http://economy-x-talk.com
http://www.salery.biz
Get your store on-line within minutes with Salery Web Store software.
Download at http://www.salery.biz
Op 31-okt-2006, om 21:05 heeft David Bovill het volg
Jacque,
>> You're probably not the only one experiencing it, just the only one
>> taking the time to write about it.
>
> I don't think so. So far, no one else has been able to reproduce the
> problem. I have never seen the problem either, and I use an awful lot of
> background groups in my work
Dave Cragg wrote:
On 31 Oct 2006, at 19:27, Richard Gaskin wrote:
By honoring the destroyStack property consistently with its
behavior for "go" and "open", we would gain greater certainty about
what's in memory.
Perhaps we see destroyStack differently. Like Trevor, I see it as
something
On 31 Oct 2006, at 19:27, Richard Gaskin wrote:
By honoring the destroyStack property consistently with its
behavior for "go" and "open", we would gain greater certainty about
what's in memory.
Perhaps we see destroyStack differently. Like Trevor, I see it as
something that comes into
How do you do that?
___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
Richard Gaskin wrote:
J. Landman Gay wrote:
In my situation, the stacks I am accessing are very large. There would
be a delay if they had to be constantly opened and closed. I could
live with it if I had to set the destroystack to false, but it is
convenient to have them go away completely whe
J. Landman Gay wrote:
In my situation, the stacks I am accessing are very large. There would
be a delay if they had to be constantly opened and closed. I could live
with it if I had to set the destroystack to false, but it is convenient
to have them go away completely when I do open them visibl
Trevor DeVore wrote:
On Oct 31, 2006, at 11:08 AM, Richard Gaskin wrote:
The destroyStack property is used to govern whether a stack remains in
memory when using "go" or "open", but it not honored when a property
within a stack is accessed.
By honoring the destroyStack property consistently,
J. Landman Gay wrote:
Richard Gaskin wrote:
Here's a circumstance in which I don't know what the result would be:
You have a stack file with mainstack "A" and substack "B", both with
their destroyStack set to true. You open substack "B", which causes the
whole stackfile to be read into memo
Trevor DeVore wrote:
On Oct 31, 2006, at 11:08 AM, Richard Gaskin wrote:
The destroyStack property is used to govern whether a stack remains
in memory when using "go" or "open", but it not honored when a
property within a stack is accessed.
By honoring the destroyStack property consistent
Richard Gaskin wrote:
Here's a circumstance in which I don't know what the result would be:
You have a stack file with mainstack "A" and substack "B", both with
their destroyStack set to true. You open substack "B", which causes the
whole stackfile to be read into memory, but do not open sta
Hi All,
If all that is required is to read a property from a stack, couldn't
there be some way of loading is "read-only"? e.g. load stack (read
only)
put the cp of stack into x
Just a thought.
Dave
On 31 Oct 2006, at 17:48, Dave Cragg wrote:
On 30 Oct 2006, at 22:43, Richard Gaskin
On Oct 31, 2006, at 11:08 AM, Richard Gaskin wrote:
The destroyStack property is used to govern whether a stack remains
in memory when using "go" or "open", but it not honored when a
property within a stack is accessed.
By honoring the destroyStack property consistently, accessing
propert
Dave Cragg wrote:
On 30 Oct 2006, at 22:43, Richard Gaskin wrote:
Consider your subsequent post:
I just remembered something (third time this week, must be the
new pills). Aren't "unused" stacks purged from memory by the
engine when it needs to reclaim memory? I think I'm referring to
Jerry Daniels wrote:
I certainly wouldn't cry if that happened, although now i use the
same device to put a stack into memory. I admit it is a "back handed"
way to do things, tho.
And with the proposed consistency in honoring the destroyStack property,
you could still do that effortlessly b
Trevor DeVore wrote:
On Oct 31, 2006, at 7:59 AM, Richard Gaskin wrote:
That this would be the case with stacks whose destroyStack property
is FALSE makes sense, but when a stack's destroyStack is TRUE this
is inconsistent with other behaviors we've come to expect from the
engine.
...
I'm
Paul L wrote:
Richard, Jerry, Chipp, Jacque, Ken, Jeanne, Dave, Phil, et. al.,
Should bug #3937 be combined with bug #1081?
It has been so long, I'd forgotten about it.
I've marked mine as related to #1081.
GMTA :)
--
Richard Gaskin
Fourth World Media Corporation
__
Trevor Hopkins wrote:
They are not referenced images or imported images but rather Photoshop
graphics copied into Rev images. The thing I'm concerned with is the
functionality of the right-click transparency feature. It seems to be
negated everytime the card is refreshed. Any ideas?
Not reall
Chipp Walters wrote:
Hi Jacque,
Hmmm. I'm not sure exactly what 'move as one as if there were a backdrop
set' means. Does it mean when you drag one window, all of them move? Or,
does it mean they all stay on the same layer?
I think the intention is to keep all the windows in the same layer, ju
Bill Marriott wrote:
You're probably not the only one experiencing it, just the only one taking
the time to write about it.
I don't think so. So far, no one else has been able to reproduce the
problem. I have never seen the problem either, and I use an awful lot of
background groups in my wor
Well, if we didn't have enough issues with dates, here's a new twist: The
"Energy Policy Act of 2005" was passed through Congress recently and it is
going to cause Daylight Savings Time to start a month earlier and end a week
later starting next year (2007).
Link:
http://www.npr.org/templates/s
Thanks, Jacqueline - that was the answer!!! absolutely no idea how it
happened (it's a big script)
J. Landman Gay wrote:
John Craig wrote:
I suddenly have all handler names appearing twice in the handler list
- only for 1 stack - all other stacks appear OK. Anyone know of a
quick fix?
Rem
Chipp Walters wrote:
BTW, this one is super easy to replicate:
Launch Rev 2.7.x
Create a new stack
add a button
close the stack by clicking the X button upper right in the titlebar
Rev asks you if you want to save, say "Don't Save"
Revolution is now suspended and another app comes to the forefro
Hi,
Well it is Halloween!
Dave
On 31 Oct 2006, at 16:36, Luis wrote:
Someone's middle name is Trouble... I like that.
Got my vote.
Cheers,
Luis.
Dave wrote:
Hi,
Sounds good to me! Just choose one though, 66, seems like a good
choice, now as long as everyone votes for that one bug and
Richard, Jerry, Chipp, Jacque, Ken, Jeanne, Dave, Phil, et. al.,
Should bug #3937 be combined with bug #1081?
It has been so long, I'd forgotten about it.
Paul Looney
___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to
Hi Jacque,
Hmmm. I'm not sure exactly what 'move as one as if there were a backdrop
set' means. Does it mean when you drag one window, all of them move? Or,
does it mean they all stay on the same layer?
Trevor, offlist, recently filed this bug showing this exact behavior:
http://support.runrev.c
OK Dave,
How about bug #66, from 2003?
Or 1619, from 2004, which already has 108 votes - and is still listed as
"unconfirmed"?
I chose these because
1. They affect a lot of users
2. They are old - and past due for fixing
3. Their resolution would make the Rev experience significantly better
4.
They are not referenced images or imported images but rather Photoshop
graphics copied into Rev images. The thing I'm concerned with is the
functionality of the right-click transparency feature. It seems to be
negated everytime the card is refreshed. Any ideas?
From: "J. Landman Gay" <[EMAIL
I certainly wouldn't cry if that happened, although now i use the
same device to put a stack into memory. I admit it is a "back handed"
way to do things, tho.
Best,
Jerry Daniels
Makers of Galaxy 1.5
http://www.daniels-mara.com/new_in_galaxy_1_5.htm
On Oct 31, 2006, at 9:59 AM, Richard G
Meant to say, it doesn't really bother me too much which one is voted
for. I'll leave it to others that have more knowledge on what causes
the most headaches. Just let me know which one you'd like me to vote
for and I'll do it.
Just want *something* fixed!!
All the Best
Dave
Hi,
Sounds g
Hi,
Sounds good to me! Just choose one though, 66, seems like a good
choice, now as long as everyone votes for that one bug and no other
bug, the count should go sky high!!!
Not sure if this is going to get us in Hot Water though!!!
All the Best
Dave
On 31 Oct 2006, at 16:15, [EMAIL PROTE
Someone's middle name is Trouble... I like that.
Got my vote.
Cheers,
Luis.
Dave wrote:
Hi,
Sounds good to me! Just choose one though, 66, seems like a good choice,
now as long as everyone votes for that one bug and no other bug, the
count should go sky high!!!
Not sure if this is going
You're probably not the only one experiencing it, just the only one taking
the time to write about it. There have been a lot of issues with the 2.7.x
series, so having the latest update is important. Writing support isn't the
same as filing a bug... and if your license doesn't allow for the upda
Trevor Hopkins wrote:
Hi All,
I have a bunch of images in a stack. I noticed that if I right-click on
a part of the image, that area becomes transparent. Thats great.
However, if I go to another card and them come back, all of those areas
that I asked to become transparent have reverted back
Hello,
Can anyone confirm that the relaunch message doesn't work with
standalones for U3 and did anyone find a fix for this already? (Rev
2.7.4, Windows XP).
Best,
Mark
--
Economy-x-Talk
Consultancy and Software Engineering
http://economy-x-talk.com
http://www.salery.biz
Get your store
On 31 Oct 2006, at 10:20, Mark Schonewille wrote:
Hi Dave,
Here, the backgroundBehavior is off by default (Rev 2.7.4). I
wonder why we experience a difference in default settings?
Strange. I'm seeing some odd behavior. On checking again, *most*
times I'm seeing the backgroundBehavior off
Hi Ken,
Here in Europa, no change is planned.
And there are states in the USA that never change of hour as Hawaii
(as far as I know :-)
Le 31 oct. 06 à 18:29, Ken Ray a écrit :
Well, if we didn't have enough issues with dates, here's a new
twist: The
"Energy Policy Act of 2005" was passed
On 30 Oct 2006, at 22:43, Richard Gaskin wrote:
Consider your subsequent post:
I just remembered something (third time this week, must be the
new pills). Aren't "unused" stacks purged from memory by the
engine when it needs to reclaim memory? I think I'm referring to
stacks without th
Jerry Daniels wrote:
Any reference to any object in a stack (or the stack itself) that
includes its file path name (the long name, the long id) will place
it in memory. You might consider that. We had that bite us several
times with Constellation and Galaxy in managing our tabs for objects.
Wrong URL. Here's the correct one that Sivakatirswami sent me earlier
that works...
http://wiki.hindu.org/quicktime/
methinks the Swami worked way too late last night and forgot about
the subdomain.
Prabhu Sivakatirswami,
I am all in favour of your Quicktime Wiki: however, on
clicking o
Dunno really, guess I trying to not make waves!
Take Care and All the Best
Dave
On 27 Oct 2006, at 17:18, Stephen Barncard wrote:
so why are you cens*ring yourself??? :>
Hi,
I'll think you'll find that the word " bocks" simply means
"nonsense". The Sex Pistols were taken to court on i
I'm not trying to change this list into a PHP forum, but I have a
question regarding speed optimization in PHP, especially about data
accumulation
into strings... I need to accumulate a large number of pixel values
into a string before
Excuses excuses... that's just because you know that her
Hi,
I'm also very interested to know if anyone got is application
certified for U3 already.
Mark
--
Economy-x-Talk
Consultancy and Software Engineering
http://economy-x-talk.com
http://www.salery.biz
Get your store on-line within minutes with Salery Web Store software.
Download at http:/
Hi All,
I have a bunch of images in a stack. I noticed that if I right-click on a
part of the image, that area becomes transparent. Thats great. However, if I
go to another card and them come back, all of those areas that I asked to
become transparent have reverted back to their default opaque
On Oct 31, 2006, at 7:59 AM, Richard Gaskin wrote:
That this would be the case with stacks whose destroyStack property
is FALSE makes sense, but when a stack's destroyStack is TRUE this
is inconsistent with other behaviors we've come to expect from the
engine.
Given that this has caused c
Hi there,
I'm not trying to change this list into a PHP forum, but I have a
question
regarding speed optimization in PHP, especially about data accumulation
into strings...
I need to accumulate a large number of pixel values into a string before
passing the string back to my Rev cgi script.
Below
Richard, et al.,
Any reference to any object in a stack (or the stack itself) that
includes its file path name (the long name, the long id) will place
it in memory. You might consider that. We had that bite us several
times with Constellation and Galaxy in managing our tabs for objects.
B
Opps! A typeo got into it! Should be:
1. Do this:
function CalledFromDiffStack(p1,p2,p3)
-- This refers to the stack etc. that called this one
put CalledFromThisStack(p1,p2,p3) into myValue
return myValue
end CalledFromDiffStack
function CalledFromThisStack(p1,p2,p3)
-- this refers to the
Hi All,
Yeah, and plenty of new stuff being added all the time, all with
their own real and potential bugs.
One thing I thought of dong was to get as many people as possible to
vote for just one bug and no others, this would drive the vote count
way up on that one bug, would be hard not t
I would assume Rev would just go off the system time, so it would be up to
Microsoft and Apple to make sure their computers adjust appropriately.
I know Macs (out of the box) can get the time off the internet, so that
would be an easy fix.
At 11:29 AM 10/31/2006, you wrote:
Well, if we didn'
Hi,
You have to be careful about using "this" as as in "this stack",
"this card", etc.
There are a number of ways around it:
1. Do this:
function CalledFromDiffStack
-- This refers to the stack etc. that called this one
put CalledFromThisStack into myValue
end CalledFromDiffStack
funct
Prabhu Sivakatirswami,
I am all in favour of your Quicktime Wiki: however, on
clicking on the URL I got a "not found" message.
Possibly I am being precipitate, or may be something
is not quite right with the URL?
sincerely, Richmond Mathewson
Its the version that was available when I ordered rev. I don't want to
report a bug if I'm the only one experiencing it.
On 10/31/06 1:06 AM, "Bill Marriott" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Does your license enable you to use 2.7.4? This is probably something you
> should write support about becau
To follow through on Stephan's proposal:
"I'm acquainted with a person in high management of Quicktime at Apple.
If someone can gather all the complaints and needs in one document
point-by-point, I can make sure he's aware of your concerns"
I have created a Wiki where we hope Revolution deve
On 10/22/06, Martin Baxter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
put gtimedtest is empty into isempty
switch isempty
case true
stuff
break
case false
other stuff
break
end switch
I've come into this a little late, no internet for a week or so, but
be aware that switch is slower than if-th
Hi Dave,
Here, the backgroundBehavior is off by default (Rev 2.7.4). I wonder
why we experience a difference in default settings?
Best,
Mark
--
Economy-x-Talk
Consultancy and Software Engineering
http://economy-x-talk.com
http://www.salery.biz
Get your store on-line within minutes with Sa
Hi John,
Le 31 oct. 06 à 10:07, John Craig a écrit :
Stinky? Hehe. Thanks Dave, but you should check Eric Chatonet's
reply - a more elegant funtion using the 'short time'. It's so
damn clean, I'm sure he must have been wearing rubber gloves as he
wrote it!
I always wear thin peccary s
On 30 Oct 2006, at 18:24, James Z wrote:
Something isn't working here.
I'm on an Intel Mac Pro, Rev Studio 2.7.3 Build 278.
I do the following:
1. File menu, New Mainstack.
2. Drag a button to the card.
3. The button is selected, Cmd G, to group.
4. right click (or control click -Property ins
OK guys, now I'm answering my own question...;-)
I've found that PHP4 includes the gd library that allows
manipulation of jpeg & gif data (among other formats) and
I'm planing to call it from Rev cgi.
PHP gurus might find my discovery a bit amusing, but other
REv cgi users might find this int
I just tried it in 2.7.2 and it seems to work fine. It must be
something specific to James' configuration.
Best,
Mark
--
Economy-x-Talk
Consultancy and Software Engineering
http://economy-x-talk.com
http://www.salery.biz
Get your store on-line within minutes with Salery Web Store software.
That's weird, James. Feel free to send me your stack with 1 grouped
button.
Mark
--
Economy-x-Talk
Consultancy and Software Engineering
http://economy-x-talk.com
http://www.salery.biz
Get your store on-line within minutes with Salery Web Store software.
Download at http://www.salery.biz
Stinky? Hehe. Thanks Dave, but you should check Eric Chatonet's reply
- a more elegant funtion using the 'short time'. It's so damn clean,
I'm sure he must have been wearing rubber gloves as he wrote it!
Dave Herndon wrote:
WOW ! John Craig's script made mine look STINKY !! I made a coupl
Does your license enable you to use 2.7.4? This is probably something you
should write support about because groups and backgrounds are a pretty
essential/core feature.
"James Z" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Hi Mark,
>
> Yes quit and restart revolution. Using fa
Hi Mark,
Yes quit and restart revolution. Using factory clean download, no plugins.
I guess I'll have forget about background buttons. Maybe I'll reinstall Rev.
Thanks,
James
On 10/30/06 10:53 AM, "Mark Schonewille" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Hi James,
>
> I followed the steps exactly as
On 10/29/06, Jeffrey Reynolds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
but much of this
increased s p a m is coming from list addresses.
I was pretty cautious about becoming a 'List' member, spam being the
real concern, so I specifically set up this address purely for that
purpose. It lasted a little over 2
BTW, this one is super easy to replicate:
Launch Rev 2.7.x
Create a new stack
add a button
close the stack by clicking the X button upper right in the titlebar
Rev asks you if you want to save, say "Don't Save"
Revolution is now suspended and another app comes to the forefront.
If anyone has a f
91 matches
Mail list logo
