On 5 Oct 2007, at 23:27, Sarah Reichelt wrote:
The proxy is set without giving an error,
but the put URL command returns nothing.
put http://..; into tURL
put URL tURL into tHTML
Sarah, what does the result return after this? It may give a hint
as to why it isn't working.
On 5 Oct 2007, at 19:06, Mark Wieder wrote:
I've put my updated version of the stack on revOnline as libSOAP
(in user
space mwieder). There are still some things that won't work from the
original, as I don't really understand what was intended for these
handlers,
and they're noted as such
Thanks for this Dave. I'll send him a debug version that checks the
result at this point and I'll ask about the authentication browser.
If the proxy server does require authentication then I'll be back for
more help :-)
Cheers,
Sarah
On 10/6/07, Dave Cragg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 5 Oct
Are these command line utils part of the default Tiger distribution? And
does anyone know what compression is used if it is not possible to rely on
these command line utilities to be present?
On 03/10/2007, Ken Ray [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 3 Oct 2007 13:01:40 -0400, Todd Higgins wrote:
Hello out there,
I just cannot find a link to download a trial version and besides: in
the RunRev Store GLX2 is priced at GBP 49,-.
Every help is welcomed.
Thanks
Arnim Weggen
Am 05.10.2007 um 05. 10 .07 21:29 schrieb Jerry Daniels:
That's correct, Paul. If you get the early update, you get
Arnim,
I think I can help you here:
1. There is no trial version of GLX2.
2. As regards the pricing, I know the price in US Dollars is $99, but
perhaps if you enter the Rev store from a UK IP address, it shows the
price in pounds? Not sure about that.
In lieu of a trial version, we have
Thank you Jerry,
so, i can buy GLX2 at 49 Pounds ($99) or get it for free when buying
an early update pack at GBP 99. After all i got it. I think in regard
of upcoming versions - especially Leopard in mind - the update pack
might be a good deal.
Cheers,
Arnim
Am 06.10.2007 um 06. 10 .07
Just curious: What has to be added to a pList to make it large enough
to warrant compression?
--
Richard Gaskin
Managing Editor, revJournal
___
Rev tips, tutorials and more: http://www.revJournal.com
Jerry
When I go to buy the update, I don't see a place to enter a code for
the free copy of GLX2--at least not before I enter billing info. How
does this work? Is it automatic or do I have to buy it and enter a
code for the $99 discount?
Thanks.
Marian
On Oct 6, 2007, at 12:30 PM, Jerry
Nothing - they are all small. My only guess is that all the pList files for
all applications ever installed are stored. All these files may be indexed
in some way - as a defaults read returns output from all the preference
files - which makes me think that it may not be compression exactly but a
Marian,
You only need to get an upgrade to Rev and you automatically get GLX2
for free. No codes or coupons.
We explain it pretty well on our site:
http://daniels-mara.com/glx2/get_it_free.html
Best,
Jerry Daniels
Daniels Mara, Inc.
Makers of GLX2
http://www.daniels-mara.com
On
Thanks.
On Oct 6, 2007, at 1:22 PM, Jerry Daniels wrote:
Marian,
You only need to get an upgrade to Rev and you automatically get
GLX2 for free. No codes or coupons.
We explain it pretty well on our site:
http://daniels-mara.com/glx2/get_it_free.html
Best,
Jerry Daniels
Daniels
On Sat, 06 Oct 2007 11:08:57 -0700, Richard Gaskin wrote:
Just curious: What has to be added to a pList to make it large
enough to warrant compression?
It's not really compression, I don't think, just binary encoding. And
why? I don't know...
:-)
Ken Ray
Sons of Thunder Software, Inc.
On 2007-10-06, at 20:30, Ken Ray wrote:
On Sat, 06 Oct 2007 11:08:57 -0700, Richard Gaskin wrote:
Just curious: What has to be added to a pList to make it large
enough to warrant compression?
It's not really compression, I don't think, just binary encoding. And
why? I don't know...
They
Dave-
Saturday, October 6, 2007, 2:02:37 AM, you wrote:
You might want to point out your revisions to RunRev. I think there
is a case for consigning the unsupported stack to the bonfire. :-)
I'm not quite sure it's up to snuff the way it is. I wrote it by
modifying your original when it
Mark-
Friday, October 5, 2007, 4:57:22 PM, you wrote:
I work with a couple of SOAP services, and frankly, I'm with Dave in
not really seeing the point of it. It seems to be a sledge-hammer to
crack a nut.
The approach I take is to make template requests with placeholders,
store them in
16 matches
Mail list logo
