Hello all,
some experiences from the toolbook scene to the posting of Andre Garcia and
others concerning runrev2web: I came from toolbook (xtalk for windows only) to
runrev where this happened some years ago.
Toolbook long ago splitted in two directions: traditional ui development in
Erm, if the problem prevents it from launching, how is he going to
'Check for Updates'?...
Cheers,
Luis.
On 24 Oct 2007, at 21:27, Björnke von Gierke wrote:
On 24 Oct 2007, at 21:47, Derek Bump wrote:
I checked the RQCC and the reports
say the bug has been fixed in the DP-2 beta
Tim,
I am an RR user like you. I agree with the things that you wrote (have
included only part of it here). I had been thinking the same things, but
had not taken the time to compose a message.
Regards,
Steven Axtell
- Original Message -
From: Timothy Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Are the docs all being redone for the 3.0 release? If they are then
maybe none of this matters. And speaking of 3.0, is there a
projected timeline for that yet?
Mark
___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this
Very interesting Toolbook history.
And your approach to creating objects for multiple environments is also
intriguing.
Thanks,
Jim Lambert
___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe,
Hi,
Is there a method in Revolution to convert integer to string and vice versa.
Example:
repeat with count = 1 to 10Put text count into value
// where I want the value to be 'text1,text2' end repeat
Thank you
Kavitha
Hi Kavitha,
In Revolution, there is no need to convert strings to integers and
vv. Your repeat loop will work fine.
repeat with x = 1 to 10
put text x comma after myList
end repeat
return char 1 to -2 of myList
Best regards,
Mark Schonewille
--
Economy-x-Talk Consulting and Software
Hi Kavitha,
Le 25 oct. 07 à 17:44, Kavitha a écrit :
Hi,
Is there a method in Revolution to convert integer to string and
vice versa.
Example:
repeat with count = 1 to 10Put text count into
value// where I want the value to be
'text1,text2'
What is missing exactly?
The dictionary is a pretty good version of a man page. Dan's book is ok at the
level of 'how to think like a computer scientist' - simple how to get
started. Very nice as far as it goes. Needs a second
edition. The pdf is ok also as a printable version of the
Hello Klaus, Hello Mark,
Thank you for your quick response;
as the script of Klaus didn´t work at once (you wrote not
tested ;-), I now use the One-Line of Mark to concatenate mp3-files
in sourceFolder and to store it in targetpath.
get shell(cat quote sourceFolder quote *.mp3
Le 16 oct. 07, à 22:42, Richmond Mathewson a écrit :
François Chaplais wrote:
version 2.6.1... looks much better organized than in
version 2.8.1
Hmm, there is a question of licencing here; but (?) I
suppose people who own licences to 2.8.1 may in some
way be allowed access to components from
Le 25 oct. 07, à 23:38, François Chaplais a écrit :
A fine point here actually. I do not have access to the 2.6.1
documentation. At this second, I am considering a buttons for
dummies stack which, among other things, point to the Rev docs. I do
not want to go into the details of parsing the
The original HyperCard manuals are hard to beat for parsimony,
elegance, and darn good writing in my opinion.
Gregory
___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage
The original manuals were more than skimpy.
I think you mean the Winkler and Shafer books.
The original HyperCard manuals are hard to beat for parsimony,
elegance, and darn good writing in my opinion.
Gregory
--
stephen barncard
s a n f r a n c i s c o
- - - - - - - - - - - -
On 10/25/07, Timothy Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Oct 24, 2007, at 12:12 PM, Richmond Mathewson wrote:
I learnt RR by trial and error, old HC knowledge
(founded on Danny goodman's EXCELLENT book...)
Me too. However, in my case, my understanding and skill have not
grown much beyond
I assume that I'm ignorant of some pretty basic stuff. Sorry to
inconvenience you folks, but I sure would appreciate some help. I'm
using Rev Studio and OSX 10.4.10
I have an App that I've been using in the development environment for
several years. I have always opened it and Rev at the
And of course Danny Goodman.
The original manuals were more than skimpy.
I think you mean the Winkler and Shafer books.
The original HyperCard manuals are hard to beat for parsimony,
elegance, and darn good writing in my opinion.
Gregory
--
stephen barncard
--
stephen
I agree with Gregory. I loved the Hypercard documentation: clear,
well-organized, concise, nice examples. I'm looking at the Hypercard Script
Language Guide right now. It's 583 pages. I wouldn't call that skimpy.
--
Regards,
Howard Bornstein
---
www.designeq.com - Hide
On 10/26/07, Stephen Barncard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The original manuals were more than skimpy.
I think you mean the Winkler and Shafer books.
The original HyperCard manuals are hard to beat for parsimony,
elegance, and darn good writing in my opinion.
Gregory
Yes, again,
Kay C Lan wrote:
People shouldn't be saying the Rev Docs should be this or that. People
should be complaining that Goodman, Shafer, DeVoto, Progue et al have failed
to see the vast market of purchasers, stepped into the void to wield their
talent in the direction of Rev books.
The majority of
On 10/26/07, Richard Gaskin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The majority of Rev's 4000+ pages of documentation was authored by the
DeVoto mentioned above, using a style guideline very similar to the one
she used for HyperTalk 2.2: The Book.
I was more partial to Dan's 'The Complete Book of
As for a third-party opportunities, get Apple to bundle Rev for free
with every Mac and I think we'd see plenty of new books about it. ;)
iPerCard?
___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe,
Le 26 oct. 07, à 05:55, Richard Gaskin a écrit :
The majority of Rev's 4000+ pages of documentation
huh? pages? do you mean paper pages? Or do you mean the online doc? (I
do not mention the pdf which is not finished).
OK, I have just spent the night looking at DocsLib by BvG, and i'm
François Chaplais wrote:
To make things simple, a VERY nice (and IMHO, simple) improvement on
the rev online doc would by the ability to send a doc command with
syntax
doc string
where string may be anything
and which would have the same effect as typing the string in the search
field of the
24 matches
Mail list logo
