On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 1:08 PM, Judy Perry katheryn.swynf...@gmail.comwrote:
It's funny you bring this up, ...
I especially like how the iTunes EULA states that it may not be used to
plan, build or operate a nuclear power facility. The last time I d/l an
update of iTunes I made certain to
The main problem, in Bulgaria at least, is that one would spend so much
money in court that defending one's copyright would not be worth it.
The word 'vampire' occurs to me.
sincerely, Richmond Mathewson.
A Thorn in the flesh is
Richmond, they were probably right. The essence of open source is that you
have access to the source code and the ability to modify it. If your stuff
had been written in (say) Python, this would be true, anyone can get Python
on OSS terms and conditions. Written in Rev, even if you distribute
but then what is the status of java? There are tons of open source apps
in java (http://java-source.net/), but a.f.a.i.k. java is not open
source otherwise IBM wouldn't urge SUN to make it OSS:
http://news.cnet.com/2100-1007_3-5165427.html. Well, it is 5 years old
news.
Viktoras
Peter
Well you bring up lots of great points. One that continually confuses is the
difference between content and tool. If you sell a lathe, you cant restrict
what someone makes on their lathe, including another kind of lathe. But if you
are selling table legs, and they are sufficiently unique,
Java is open source by now: GPL with Classpath exception.
There are several open-source projects regarding Java, of which OpenJDK6 and
OpenJDK7 are run by Sun, and where they've worked on replacing copyrighted code
with new open-source implementations; but there is also IcedTea (an
Well, start with the ZX81, running a Nuclear Power plant, and go up
from there (with a 16k RAM pack +wobble).
Cheers,
Luis.
On 24 Mar 2009, at 06:15, Kay C Lan wrote:
On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 1:08 PM, Judy Perry
katheryn.swynf...@gmail.comwrote:
It's funny you bring this up, ...
I
Hello,
for a project I need all the power of RegExp runrev can offer. Does anyone have
an extended docu of the regexp usage in runrev at hand?
In the docu within the runrev IDE (try matchtext) I found the necessary
[0-9a-zA-Zäöü ...] for making regexp like
get matchText(line,([0-9]+.[0-9]+).?
Peter Alcibiades wrote:
they were probably right.
I didn't say they were wrong; I said I thought they were silly.
I am not a purist; in fact there are quite a few people I know
who believe I am about the most impure person there is :)
The folks at Ubuntu would like us to believe they are pure
Hi,
I have put a Revolution calendar online. You can subscribe to the
following URL: webcal://runrev.info/ical/revolution.ics using iCal
or compatible software. For now, it has only one event, but you can
let me know about important future Revolution-related events and I
will add them as
On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 6:38 PM, Luis l...@anachreon.co.uk wrote:
Well, start with the ZX81, running a Nuclear Power plant, and go up from
there (with a 16k RAM pack +wobble).
Unfortunately I believe the 250 baud cassette interface was only usable for
data storage, not music playback ;-)
For a quick syntax guide you might try here:
http://wademan.com/AutoHotkey/PCRESyntax/pcresyntax.html
For more detail, try here:
http://wademan.com/AutoHotkey/PCRESyntax/pcrepattern.html
for diferences between PCRE and Perl, you might try wikipedia, link No 2:
Need: A way to show presentation slides in one window along with a Rev
stack or other media in another window.
The problem with PowerPoint is that it takes over the entire screen
during a slide show, and switching to another window, e.g., with Mac
Spaces, is distracting.
One solution is to
Well, the problem here is that the vampires bite the other way; increasingly
here the vampires are the major huge companies holding IP rights and they
issue subpeona's/lawsuits against network printers and old people who don't
even own computers and bleed them dry.
Fun stuff like that.
Not that I
Peter Alcibiades wrote:
Probably Richard Gaskin is mistaken for a similar reason
in saying that All open source applications that run on
Windows, Mac, or any other non-FOSS OS are just as
proprietary as any Rev project released under similar
license.
No, not really. If its OSS, you have the
I have a stand alone RR application that requires that the user log into
thier web application using revBrowser, authenticate log into thier account
and then collection of account data from a web text area.
After logon the web application loads user information in XML format into a
TEXTAREA on
Hi from Paris,
I grabbed the idea of using Revolution as a
presentation tool quite early on.
I build many of my slides using EazyDraw (today
I can't do without it). I can export them in PDF
form (which I prefer for its precision) and
also JPEG. Of course JPEG is easier for Rev.
I use Snap'nDrag
What does the open source community say about revenue? What if a system came
into being that tracked source contributions absolutely no matter the
granularity (number of bits) or depth of nesting (part of joe's code was part
of mary's code was part of paul's code). Such that when any current
If done correctly, such a scheme would never alow a downstream integrator to
impinge on upstream contributon. Such a scheme would want to favor interpreter
vs. compiler (or would it?). Where is the ownership graph stored or embedded?
How do you make bits traceable? By abstracted
Hi all,
I have a script that uses launch URL theURL to open Outlook, but sometimes it
doesn't open it.
theURL = mailto:m...@somecompany.com?subject=blah blah blahBody=This is the
message body text, with sometimes lots of text. And sometimes a small amount of
text.
I think the amount of text in
Recently, mfstu...@cox.net wrote:
I have a script that uses launch URL theURL to open Outlook, but sometimes
it doesn't open it.
theURL = mailto:m...@somecompany.com?subject=blah blah blahBody=This is the
message body text, with sometimes lots of text. And sometimes a small amount
of text.
In theory this is possible by intercepting the revBrowserBeforenavigate
message (by parsing the url that is passed as a parameter). In practice it
doesn't work on Windows because of a bug...
http://quality.runrev.com/qacenter/show_bug.cgi?id=5125
...I reported in June 2006.
Terry...
On
Scott wrote:
Is there any difference if you use the revMail command?
For some older email programs, it may not be possible to specify a
ccAddress, mailSubject, or messageBody. Generally, the revMail command
will
still work with such programs, but only the To: header will be set.
Hi Scott,
Just
If not a bug, then a gremlin.
In a stack, make a locked field with several lines of text. In the field
script put:
on mouseUp
set cursor to plus
repeat until the mouseClick
put the mouseLine
end repeat
end mouseUp
Move the mouse over the various lines in the field. You will get
Things still ain't working like they used to, but,
following up on some of the advise here, some
other possibly useful clues have come up.
BTW, perhaps I wasn't clear on this. It's not that
my Rev-cgi setup no longer works. All my Rev-cgi
scripts still work. What is not working well since
the
25 matches
Mail list logo
