On Fri Jun 25, 2010, Ben Rubinstein benr_mc at cogapp.com wrote:
On 25/06/2010 17:36, Wilhelm Sanke wrote:
And, if someone finds out that you can crash Rev with
only four lines of script this should definitely arouse the attention
of the responsible members of the Rev team, irrespective
On Thu, 24 Jun 2010, Ben Rubinstein benr...@cogapp.com wrote:
On 22/06/2010 16:01, Wilhelm Sanke wrote:
Apparently he had taken a look at the Revolution bug database with its
enormous lags in fixing even fatal bugs, e.g. Report #8275 Groups:
Bugs and features (last group broken)? of
On 25/06/2010 17:36, Wilhelm Sanke wrote:
One thought that led me to put together a more comprehensive report is
the assumption that at least some of the listed bugs are somehow related
to each other.
You can always create five separate reports, and then create a sixth one
suggesting that there
Ben Rubinstein wrote:
(I also know that some bugs have been fixed although the entry in
Bugzilla hasn't been addressed. That may be because the bug was found
independantly either by RR directly or because of a duplicate report,
and it's just annoying that they've never noticed my report; or
quality, anyway. There is no
better alternative on this than doing what you do, right. And not doing the
things you do not have the resources to do right.
--
View this message in context:
http://runtime-revolution.278305.n4.nabble.com/OT-Computer-news-from-Kassel-tp2264252p2266644.html
Sent from
Because you are not going to succeed as a company by
introducing them at the expense of overall quality, anyway.
Maybe someone forgot to explain that to a little outfit called Microsoft...
They seem to have succeeded pretty well over the years, publishing
products with thousands upon thousands
Again, we are using the word bugs here on a one dimensional sense, as though
all bugs were created equal. Is it reasonable to expect Adobe to fix a bug that
deselects an object when I alt-shift-control-right-click on a menu? No, it's
not. Is it reasonable to expect them to fix it when it
On 06/24/2010 03:31 PM, David C. wrote:
Because you are not going to succeed as a company by
introducing them at the expense of overall quality, anyway.
Maybe someone forgot to explain that to a little outfit called Microsoft...
They seem to have succeeded pretty well over the years,
On 06/24/2010 07:02 PM, Bob Sneidar wrote:
Again, we are using the word bugs here on a one dimensional sense, as though
all bugs were created equal. Is it reasonable to expect Adobe to fix a bug that deselects
an object when I alt-shift-control-right-click on a menu? No, it's not. Is it
On 22/06/2010 16:01, Wilhelm Sanke wrote:
It is as yet unknown whether during his stay in Edinburgh the new
professor had come into contact with Revolution or the Revolution team,
but considering the topic of his work this seems to be highly probable.
Apparently he had taken a look at the
of
the clearest symptoms of the illness. The cure begins with acceptance and
acknowledgment of the problem.
--
View this message in context:
http://runtime-revolution.278305.n4.nabble.com/OT-Computer-news-from-Kassel-tp2264252p2265064.html
Sent from the Revolution - User mailing list
On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 11:07 AM, Bob Sneidar b...@twft.com wrote:
[...] they are paying for free upgrades.
I'm sorry. I laughed out loud when I read that. Talk about the definition of
an oxymoron. ;-)
Jeff M.
___
use-revolution mailing list
Heh heh. Listen to what I mean, not what I say. ;-)
Bob
On Jun 23, 2010, at 9:13 AM, Jeff Massung wrote:
On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 11:07 AM, Bob Sneidar b...@twft.com wrote:
[...] they are paying for free upgrades.
I'm sorry. I laughed out loud when I read that. Talk about the
On budget
On time
Bug free
Pick any two.
/H
___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription
preferences:
Hugh-
Wednesday, June 23, 2010, 10:07:57 AM, you wrote:
On budget
On time
Bug free
Pick any two.
I have enough trouble just picking *one*...
--
-Mark Wieder
mwie...@ahsoftware.net
___
use-revolution mailing list
On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 2:16 PM, Mark Wieder mwie...@ahsoftware.net wrote:
Hugh-
Wednesday, June 23, 2010, 10:07:57 AM, you wrote:
On budget
On time
Bug free
Pick any two.
I have enough trouble just picking *one*...
I've mixed them and end up picking budget free...
--
-Mark
I am very much aware of the fact that software is almost never bug-free.
Apart from the first part - where I wanted to direct your attention to
the computer pioneer Konrad Zuse - the rest of my post was written with
some degree of tongue-in-cheek (both in its positive and negative
On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 4:33 PM, Wilhelm Sanke sa...@hrz.uni-kassel.dewrote:
I am very much aware of the fact that software is almost never bug-free.
It is not that software is never bug-free... software is only ready when it
is bug free, the problem is that software is never ready (or at
1. People around Kassel - and elsewhere - today celebrate the 100th
birthday of Konrad Zuse, the inventor of the first programmable computer.
Some extracts from Wikipedia:
Konrad Zuse ( 22 June 1910) was a German engineer and computer pioneer.
His greatest achievem was the world's first
:
http://runtime-revolution.278305.n4.nabble.com/OT-Computer-news-from-Kassel-tp2264252p2265064.html
Sent from the Revolution - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url
20 matches
Mail list logo
