You can also use keyboard shortcuts to switch between the browse and
pointer tools.
ctrl/cmd +9 or ctrl/cmd +0
This is technique I use, and it mostly works.
Bernard
On Sun, Dec 20, 2009 at 10:43 AM, Wilhelm Sanke sa...@hrz.uni-kassel.de wrote:
As I have found out now, in case the tools stack
Richard Gaskin ambassador at fourthworld.com wrote:
Wilhelm wrote:
On my medium-sized screen there is ample room besides the Rev tools
stack to accommodate two open script editor windows side by side, so
there is really no need to hide the tools stack in the default
preferences settings.
On Fri, 18 Dec 2009, Richard Gaskin ambassa...@fourthworld.com wrote:
Wilhelm wrote:
What is really gained by hiding the tools palette when the script
editor
comes up - and it seems to me to be not only a matter of preferences,
but a real bug, that the tools palette does not reappear
On Sat, Dec 19, 2009 at 6:23 PM, Wilhelm Sanke sa...@hrz.uni-kassel.dewrote:
I had indicated the reproducible steps in my post of Dec 15 (thread Rev
IDE vs MetaCard IDE ):
- If you edit a script and close the editor with the close icon - instead
of the compile button - the tools palette
Kay C Lan lan.kc.macmail at gmail.com wrote:
- If you edit a script and close the editor with the close icon -
instead
of the compile button - the tools palette (which disappears when you
open
the script editor) will not re-appear.,
i.e. after you have made a change to the script and
Wilhelm wrote:
On my medium-sized screen there is ample room besides the Rev tools
stack to accommodate two open script editor windows side by side, so
there is really no need to hide the tools stack in the default
preferences settings.
At the heart of this issue is the question: What would
Wilhelm wrote:
On my medium-sized screen there is ample room besides the Rev tools
stack to accommodate two open script editor windows side by side, so
there is really no need to hide the tools stack in the default
preferences settings.
I use the Rev 3.5 IDE editor for my development (single
Jim Ault wrote:
The option of individual script editor windows would be *very* nice,
This is a prefs setting too. Change it in the Script Editor pane and new
editor windows will open for each script. You can also right-click on
any tab in the editor to move that script to its own window.
Thanks for the tip... obviously I have not spent time exploring the
differences between 2.9 and 3.5.
On Dec 19, 2009, at 4:32 PM, J. Landman Gay wrote:
Jim Ault wrote:
The option of individual script editor windows would be *very* nice,
This is a prefs setting too. Change it in the
I will check if settings that preference
solves this problem.
Many thanks for your answer! :-)
Alejandro
--
View this message in context:
http://n4.nabble.com/VOTE-Tool-Palette-dissapear-randomly-Report-8500-tp974505p974804.html
Sent from the Revolution - User mailing list archive
.nabble.com/VOTE-Tool-Palette-dissapear-randomly-Report-8500-tp974505p974505.html
Sent from the Revolution - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe
, this strange event will not repeat elsewhere,
anytime soon.
Alejandro
George C Brackett wrote:
Just voted. The absolute worst thing for a technology teacher
is to have the technology fail in class!
--
View this message in context:
http://n4.nabble.com/VOTE-Tool-Palette-dissapear-randomly
Alejandro-
Friday, December 18, 2009, 7:10:14 AM, you wrote:
Not only that, but i could testify how some scripts
suddenly stopped working and stacks refused to
compile in any of the computers available...
Really weird. Later that day, when i received these
stacks via email, i was able to
George C Brackett wrote:
Just voted. The absolute worst thing for a technology teacher is to
have the technology fail in class!
Have you experienced the problem yourself? The team would like only
those people who actually have the problem to vote on it, and those
people should also add a
Jacqueline, I understand your point, and wouldn't be voting for this
'bug' anyway (it might be the case that Alejandro was caught out by
the behaviour of IDEs that were operating with defaults that he does
not see in his own IDE). But from what you're saying it seems to me
that the voting system
I find that fact disappointing.
that only a small subset of users ever bother to report bugs.
___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription
Bernard Devlin wrote:
But from what you're saying it seems to me
that the voting system is being re-purposed.
Not exactly. I was basing it on a discussion I had with Mark Waddingham,
who bemoaned the fact that votes don't give him much indication of what
to work on next. The voting system
Confirmed here!
Judy
On Fri, 18 Dec 2009, Mark Wieder wrote:
This is a known problem.
Anytime you try to demonstrate any software it will fail randomly,
unexpectedly, and without apparent logical reason.
Recipe:
1. take known working application
2. demonstrate for prospective clients
On Thu Dec 17, 2009, J. Landman Gay jacque at hyperactivesw.com wrote:
Alejandro Tejada wrote:
Today, while teaching how to use RevMedia 4.00 v950
to a group of teachers, the tool palette dissapear
and sometimes reappear when users click at the
open stack. Sometimes, the tool palette
Goodness. I apologize, since I haven't seen the bug myself. I'll un-vote if
that's possible. I may have transgressed in the past, too. I guess I was voting
on the question, Is this an important bug to check out? rather than Is this
a bug that's causing you fits and ought to be fixed? Seems to
Wilhelm wrote:
What is really gained by hiding the tools palette when the script editor
comes up - and it seems to me to be not only a matter of preferences,
but a real bug, that the tools palette does not reappear when closing
the editor via the close icon?
Both presently existing defaults
It's not your job to make your bug voting habit the way runrev wants it to be.
it's runrevs task to make the vote system work in a way that is useful to them.
If the current system is not useful to them, then:
a.) your votes are superfluous, as they ignore votes, or use them only in
border
Recently, Björnke von Gierke wrote:
It's not your job to make your bug voting habit the way runrev wants it to be.
it's runrevs task to make the vote system work in a way that is useful to
them.
So wait, is this a vote FOR or AGAINST voting?
:-)
Regards,
Scott Rossi
Creative Director
I vote against voting for for, and I vote.
On Dec 18, 2009, at 3:12 PM, Scott Rossi wrote:
Recently, Björnke von Gierke wrote:
It's not your job to make your bug voting habit the way runrev wants it to
be.
it's runrevs task to make the vote system work in a way that is useful to
them.
George C Brackett wrote:
Goodness. I apologize, since I haven't seen the bug myself. I'll
un-vote if that's possible. I may have transgressed in the past, too.
Nah, I wouldn't worry about it. And I apologize for sounding harsh. When
I wrote, the voice in my head sounded so matter of fact. And
Wilhelm Sanke wrote:
What is really gained by hiding the tools palette when the script editor
comes up - and it seems to me to be not only a matter of preferences,
but a real bug, that the tools palette does not reappear when closing
the editor via the close icon?
Mostly it gains space on
.
http://quality.runrev.com/qacenter/show_bug.cgi?id=8500
Thanks in advance.
Alejandro
--
View this message in context:
http://n4.nabble.com/VOTE-Tool-Palette-dissapear-randomly-Report-8500-tp974505p974505.html
Sent from the Revolution - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com
Alejandro Tejada wrote:
Today, while teaching how to use RevMedia 4.00 v950
to a group of teachers, the tool palette dissapear
and sometimes reappear when users click at the
open stack. Sometimes, the tool palette completely
dissapears and it was necessary to close the IDE and
restart RevMedia
28 matches
Mail list logo
