On 12/19/05 4:00 PM, "Dick Kriesel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks for asking, Ken. My answer is neither: I'm concerned because of the
> following message from Scott Raney, which leads me to think there may be
> some disqualifying problem in the design or implementation of the
> executionCo
On 12/17/05 9:50 AM, "Ken Ray" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 12/17/05 3:14 AM, "Dick Kriesel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Your answer left me a hope that maybe we were just a BZ away from being able
>> to use the executionContexts in a standalone, so I decided to search BZ
>> before asking
Dick Kriesel wrote:
Your answer left me a hope that maybe we were just a BZ away from being able
to use the executionContexts in a standalone, so I decided to search BZ
before asking about that possibility. The result was a surprise, so here's
another question:
Would you please comment on the r
On 12/17/05 3:14 AM, "Dick Kriesel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Your answer left me a hope that maybe we were just a BZ away from being able
> to use the executionContexts in a standalone, so I decided to search BZ
> before asking about that possibility.
Dick, are you saying that you can't use e
Your answer left me a hope that maybe we were just a BZ away from being able
to use the executionContexts in a standalone, so I decided to search BZ
before asking about that possibility. The result was a surprise, so here's
another question:
Would you please comment on the resolutions of BZ 724 a
