On my side the only thing I'd like for ß-testing is that Runtime, due
to a good selling 2.9 version, obtains the needed resources to address
specific issues of the product (for me bugs #670 and #4944) and show
the will to address them (and not only make promises), preferabely not
in several
Hi Kay,
> I think you meant: Rev Media 2.9
Indeed I did :)
___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listi
On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 5:19 PM, Bill Marriott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> We only just now released Rev 2.9 for Mac and Windows (Linux coming
> shortly).
>
I think you meant: Rev Media 2.9
___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.
Richmond,
>>>
I thought that on the strength of my
RevMedia 2.7.1 license I might be allowed, at least,
RevMedia 2.9.
<<<
We only just now released Rev 2.9 for Mac and Windows (Linux coming
shortly).
Since you purchased a version of Revolution 2.7.x, you get 2.9 for free. You
and others who pu
Sarah Reichel wrote:
"For my part, I thoroughly enjoyed beta-testing. All I
expected to get
out of it was for Revolution to be improved and I
certainly got that."
Yes, you are right insofar as the actual Beta-testing
goes. However, I thought that on the strength of my
RevMedia 2.7.1 license I mig
On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 6:07 PM, Richmond Mathewson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Well I tested the 2.9 Beta at quite a considerable
> cost in time to myself, and with my extant licence for
> RevMedia 2.7.1 expected some sort of acknowledgement.
> But it was not to be. Pity really.
For my part,
Richmond,
The most important thing we all "got" out of the beta was a much-improved
product.
We're still evaluating what we want to do to recognize active testers. There
will be a final beta update shortly with this info and a wrap-up on the beta
program in general.
Bill
_
Here is a message that was posted concerning the release of 2.9 being
free:
Subject:Re: concerning 2.9 as "free"
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: February 25, 2008 10:19:39 AM PST
Heather has posted this information in the forums. I'll do the same
here:
Y
Richmond,
Such is the nature of public betas. People who beta tested OSX as
part of the public beta still had to buy it.
However, I thought purchasers of 2.7 got a free upgrade. Or am I
wrong? You might want to check with Rev support.
M
On Apr 16, 2008, at 3:07 AM, Richmond Mathewson wr
Well I tested the 2.9 Beta at quite a considerable
cost in time to myself, and with my extant licence for
RevMedia 2.7.1 expected some sort of acknowledgement.
But it was not to be. Pity really.
sincerely, Richmond Mathewson
A Thorn in
10 matches
Mail list logo
