Judy Perry wrote:
Wasn't that Marielle's project?
And maybe it was; however, Marielle has gone a bit
AWOL;
whether for her own reasons or she was a bit
cheesed-off by some comments made on this list I am
not sure. I wish her well (despite having had some
fairly groovy tiffs with her in the
Here it is:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Runtime_Revolution_Alt-Dox
So; let's get down-n-dirty and try to put together
something which consists of more than our collective
moans :)
sincerely, Richmond Mathewson
A Thorn in the flesh
Here it is:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Runtime_Revolution_Alt-Dox
So; let's get down-n-dirty and try to put together
something which consists of more than our collective
moans :)
sincerely, Richmond Mathewson
Dang! I went to the page, it existed, Richmond had created a partial
outline
I am adding a bit to the Card category this morning.
--
Windows and Macintosh shareware games
BIackjack Gold
http://www.gypsyware.com
___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and
Wow!
Thanks Shari!
Went all colourful; not sure how good this is?
sincerely, Richmond Mathewson
A Thorn in the flesh is better than a failed Systems Development Life Cycle.
Wow!
Thanks Shari!
Went all colourful; not sure how good this is?
sincerely, Richmond Mathewson
I didn't color anything, Richmond. Maybe it's a built in Wiki thing?
Nor did I create links as we don't have the sections to link to yet :-)
But it's a beginning, and I support the effort.
OK - I have not been following this thread too closely - but WikiPedia is
not the place for this - I am pretty sure they won't allow it (its not free
wiki space). Also MediaWiki does not yet have a good enough API to allow for
the wiki to be properly embedded into the RevIde. If you want to do
OK - I have not been following this thread too closely - but WikiPedia is
not the place for this - I am pretty sure they won't allow it (its not free
wiki space). Also MediaWiki does not yet have a good enough API to allow for
the wiki to be properly embedded into the RevIde. If you want to do
Shari wrote:
I wonder if the Wiki allows it to be separated into
different pages?
Up the top there are a series of blueish buttons:
HOME , EDIT PAGE , NEW PAGE , COMMENTS , FILES
I suppose the NEW PAGE button is the one you are
wanting :)
sincerely, Richmond Mathewson
Hi, Ken!
The disclaimer at the top of the Wiki states:
The contents of this Wiki are offered as
supplementary footnotes to the information contained
with the Runtime Revolution RAD.
and, on a second look, Shari's write-up for CARD is
almost the same as the RR documentation; and extremely
and, on a second look, Shari's write-up for CARD is
almost the same as the RR documentation; and extremely
obscure.
sorry, Shari; but it is a bit soupy
particularly as the thing that finally got me going
with this was my son Andro's great difficulty to
understand the inbuilt docs.
Okay then,
On Sun, 24 Jun 2007 12:50:14 -0400, Shari wrote:
Richmond moved the Wiki and I've already made a contribution :-) Any
and all suggestions and additions are welcome :-) I wonder if the
Wiki allows it to be separated into different pages?
I certainly hope so (most wikis allow you to create
Shari wrote:
Okay then, perhaps others need to flesh out their idea of a Wiki
before I contribute, so that I can follow the desired path.
snip
I will be happy to contribute again when it is fleshed out a bit more
so that I can follow along.
--If everyone does this, I suspect nothing much
or Jira (I opted
for Trac). I've already
got up and running a documentation wiki integrated
with a code repository -
so you can make links between the code and the docs.
You are more than
wellcome to use, it, combine forces, or I can set up
a new one for the
project.
Some arguments
I
Dear Shari et al,
I believe to provide a Wiki that does not do what
the Runtime Revolution Documentation does, but does
what it does not, well:
We need to become like little children, or at least
like people who don't know what OBJECTS, COMMANDS and
FUNCTIONS are; and think that a computer
Actually I have some thoughts about a basic outline. Rather than
Cards, Buttons, etc what about something like:
Code Examples
Tutorials
Beginner Topics
and so forth?
Code Examples would be a list of messages and commands, where we
could post code examples.
Tutorials might encompass
Shari, Richmond, et al,
In my opinion the most useful thing we can provide are some truly
well conceived and implemented templates so that our newest users
have something that works right out of the box and can be modified to
suit their specific needs. I suspect that five or six different
In my opinion the most useful thing we can provide are some truly
well conceived and implemented templates so that our newest users
have something that works right out of the box and can be modified
to suit their specific needs. I suspect that five or six different
templates would cover pretty
On 6/25/07, David Bovill [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
OK - I have not been following this thread too closely - but WikiPedia is
not the place for this - I am pretty sure they won't allow it (its not free
wiki space). Also MediaWiki does not yet have a good enough API to allow for
the wiki to be
Is it editable? ie. can we contribute?
Mark
On 24 Jun 2007, at 23:08, Sarah Reichelt wrote:
On 6/25/07, David Bovill [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
OK - I have not been following this thread too closely - but
WikiPedia is
not the place for this - I am pretty sure they won't allow it (its
not
I think you need to get a login to be allowed to edit. Heather or
someone from RunRev might be able to leap in here.
Sarah
On 6/25/07, Mark Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is it editable? ie. can we contribute?
Mark
On 24 Jun 2007, at 23:08, Sarah Reichelt wrote:
On 6/25/07, David Bovill
I've mentioned it many times, but the format of the MySQL.org
documentation is stellar. Good definitions and examples followed by
user submitted tips and tricks RELATING TO THE KEYWORD. Great CMS,
the best i've seen. Code formatting is nice, too. THIS is what we
need. Obviously the comments
On 6/25/07, Stephen Barncard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've mentioned it many times, but the format of the MySQL.org
documentation is stellar. Good definitions and examples followed by
user submitted tips and tricks RELATING TO THE KEYWORD. Great CMS,
the best i've seen. Code formatting is nice,
This also sounds like a good idea. Instead of trying to formulate the
exact rose we want to breed, why not take the approach of appreciating all
of the flowers that may bloom?
Judy
On Sun, 24 Jun 2007, Joe Lewis Wilkins wrote:
Shari, Richmond, et al,
In my opinion the most useful thing we
Thanks for the link!
Judy
On Sun, 24 Jun 2007, Stephen Barncard wrote:
I've mentioned it many times, but the format of the MySQL.org
documentation is stellar. Good definitions and examples followed by
user submitted tips and tricks RELATING TO THE KEYWORD. Great CMS,
the best i've seen.
25 matches
Mail list logo
