Francis-
Saturday, October 9, 2010, 4:14:52 AM, you wrote:
> I don't like zapping application code, but this is OK for me,
I agree. It's just a short-term hack that does the trick for now.
> But my question is : How in "Rev's" name did you know that ?
I used the IDE's Find command to search f
Hi from Beautiful Brittanny
Mark wrote :
You can alway hack the script of button "revBackScript" of stack
"revlibrary.rev"... (hint: look at lines 892 and 1007)
Thanks Mark, that did the trick.
I don't like zapping application code, but this is OK for me,
seeing as I may live with Livecode 4
I'm happy for you. You have no idea how blessed you are.
--
Best regards,
Mark Schonewille
Economy-x-Talk Consulting and Software Engineering
Homepage: http://economy-x-talk.com
Twitter: http://twitter.com/xtalkprogrammer
KvK: 50277553
Download the Installer Maker plugin for Runtime Revolution
On 10/8/10 12:13 PM, dunb...@aol.com wrote:
That stack is a model of clean, elegant design. Pleasing to the eye, it is
easy to see that it was carefully planned. Object alignment and uniformity
is inspired. Who is the artist, I wonder?
:) Of course, since it is never viewed, it can look like an
On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 2:13 PM, wrote:
> That stack is a model of clean, elegant design. Pleasing to the eye, it is
> easy to see that it was carefully planned. Object alignment and uniformity
> is inspired. Who is the artist, I wonder?
>
>
it looks like one of mine but I am just a student, this
Craig-
Friday, October 8, 2010, 10:13:11 AM, you wrote:
> That stack is a model of clean, elegant design. Pleasing to the eye, it is
> easy to see that it was carefully planned. Object alignment and uniformity
> is inspired. Who is the artist, I wonder?
--
-Mark Wieder
mwie...@ahsoftware.net
That stack is a model of clean, elegant design. Pleasing to the eye, it is
easy to see that it was carefully planned. Object alignment and uniformity
is inspired. Who is the artist, I wonder?
Craig Newman
In a message dated 10/8/10 1:07:11 PM, mwie...@ahsoftware.net writes:
> You can alway hac
I'd like to know the answer to that question too.
Pete Haworth
On Oct 8, 2010, at 10:00 AM, use-revolution-requ...@lists.runrev.com
wrote:
I see that when saving stacks, we have the possibility
of creating a "legacy stack".
What difference does this make to the stack ?
__
Francis-
Friday, October 8, 2010, 8:07:33 AM, you wrote:
> Question 2 : Can I automatically have the .rev
> suffix used when creating a livecode stack ?
> (Can't find anything in "Preferences" !)
You can alway hack the script of button "revBackScript" of stack
"revlibrary.rev"... (hint: look at
On 10/08/2010 06:07 PM, Francis Nugent Dixon wrote:
Hi from Beautiful Brittany,
With LiveCode, new stacks are created with the
.livecode suffix, and this screws up several of my
utility programs which create paths which assume
a .rev suffix.
Of course, when I save a new stack, I can always
rep
I complained about this during the last 4.5 beta on the Improve list.
I too find this inordinately long suffix forced on us very cumbersome and
annoying. In all views, a list of livecode stacks with the long suffix is
distracting due to the repitition and in the case of icon view, it is often
hard
Hi from Beautiful Brittany,
With LiveCode, new stacks are created with the
.livecode suffix, and this screws up several of my
utility programs which create paths which assume
a .rev suffix.
Of course, when I save a new stack, I can always
replace the livecode suffix with .rev, and this
seems to
12 matches
Mail list logo
