On 10/09/2004, at 3:22 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
From: Jeanne A. E. DeVoto [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 10 September 2004 3:56:50 AM
To: How to use Revolution [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Mac Classic Apps Run Under OS X but Not On Native Classic
Reply-To: How to use Revolution [EMAIL PROTECTED
At 1:50 PM -0400 9/8/2004, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So when LongHorn comes out, will the Win32 designation change to Win64
when LongHorn is detected?
I'm not sure. (I'm actually kind of mystified why it's Win32 in the
first place, rather than the generic Windows.)
Would the difference between
At 12:55 AM -0700 9/8/2004, Jan Schenkel wrote:
Allow me to agree wiht you in priciple but propose
sightly diferent contents :
- MacOS : the good old pre-OS X thing
- MacOS Classic : the compatibility environment
- MacOS X : the operating system of the future
- ...
This way, if you want to check
On 9/9/04 12:53 PM, Jeanne A. E. DeVoto [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 1:50 PM -0400 9/8/2004, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So when LongHorn comes out, will the Win32 designation change to Win64
when LongHorn is detected?
I'm not sure. (I'm actually kind of mystified why it's Win32 in the
first
At 12:55 AM -0700 9/8/2004, Jan Schenkel wrote:
Allow me to agree wiht you in priciple but propose
sightly diferent contents :
- MacOS : the good old pre-OS X thing
- MacOS Classic : the compatibility environment
- MacOS X : the operating system of the future
- ...
This way, if you want to check
At 9:50 PM -0700 9/5/2004, Richard Gaskin wrote:
What's needed is a function added to the engine to let us know
whether we're native or under OS X when running OS 9 and earlier.
What should it be called, and who wants to add it to Bugzilla?
My vote is to modify the platform function so it
--- Jeanne A. E. DeVoto [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
At 9:50 PM -0700 9/5/2004, Richard Gaskin wrote:
What's needed is a function added to the engine to
let us know
whether we're native or under OS X when running OS
9 and earlier.
What should it be called, and who wants to add it
to
On Sep 8, 2004, at 12:13 AM, Jeanne A. E. DeVoto wrote:
At 9:50 PM -0700 9/5/2004, Richard Gaskin wrote:
What's needed is a function added to the engine to let us know
whether we're native or under OS X when running OS 9 and earlier.
What should it be called, and who wants to add it to Bugzilla?
:
Subject:Re: Mac Classic Apps Run Under OS X but Not On
Native Classic
On Sep 8, 2004, at 12:13 AM, Jeanne A. E. DeVoto wrote:
At 9:50 PM -0700 9/5/2004, Richard Gaskin wrote:
What's needed is a function added to the engine to let us know
whether we're native or under OS X when running OS
On Sep 8, 2004, at 3:55 AM, Jan Schenkel wrote:
Allow me to agree wiht you in priciple but propose
sightly diferent contents :
- MacOS : the good old pre-OS X thing
- MacOS Classic : the compatibility environment
- MacOS X : the operating system of the future
- ...
This way, if you want to check
OS 9.2 runs fine by itself. I believe 9.2.2 is the current latest
version of Classic MacOS.
Bill
On Sep 5, 2004, at 9:36 PM, Dan Shafer wrote:
My problem went away when I put the unstuffed version on a CD and
manually loaded it on the OS 9 machine.
One possible clue. OS 9.2 is, I think, not
Reporting in on this... My splash engine -- standalone built with 2.2.1
(on OSX) and copied to CD and then copied to an old eMac PPC running
9.2, failed. So, its' more than .sit compression issues.
I'll bugZilla this:
Dan, any progress on your end? I've got 2 users standing by... at this
point
On Sep 5, 2004, at 8:55 PM, Sannyasin Sivakatirswami wrote:
Reporting in on this... My splash engine -- standalone built with
2.2.1 (on OSX) and copied to CD and then copied to an old eMac PPC
running 9.2, failed. So, its' more than .sit compression issues.
I'll bugZilla this:
Dan, any progress
Dan Shafer wrote:
One possible clue. OS 9.2 is, I think, not recommended for running
outside the OS X compatibility layer. I could be wrong about that but it
may be worth checking.
Houston, we have a problem: paths are handled differently between OS 9
and OS X. We could account for that
Yeah, I built it in 2.2.1. That's the one that doesn't run.
On Sep 3, 2004, at 6:29 PM, Alex Tweedly wrote:
At 17:23 03/09/2004 -0700, Dan Shafer wrote:
I've read some stuff on the list (going back a ways) about needing to
build OS 9 apps in the OS 9 version of RR (which of course is not yet
Having same problem here... I've got a number of people who want to
pitch in on a huge project, but they are running 9.2 on old Macs.
Someone said that the compression could be the problem if you used
.sit on OSX...to generate the file for the OS9 user and if they an old
version of stuffit..
I suspect that'll fix it. I'm going to keep experimenting to see if I
can find a secret to allowing me to email these files but in the
meanwhile, my sole OS9 user during beta is in the same office area, so
it's not a huge burden.
On Sep 4, 2004, at 7:05 PM, Sannyasin Sivakatirswami wrote:
17 matches
Mail list logo
