Thanks for this suggestion, Jim. I'll have a look at it. I'm sure
that I will at least learn a lot as I always do from your stacks.
Cheers, Roger
On Jun 9, 2005, at 6:33 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Roger,
This isn't what you want but you might find it an alternative. You
would have t
Tom,
Thanks very much for this suggestion . . . I'll work with this. Of
course my task is complicated by the fact that I am going from one
stack to another, but I enjoy the challenge.
Thanks again, Roger
On Jun 8, 2005, at 5:07 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
You could capture the sta
Message: 6
Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2005 16:30:12 -0700
From: Roger Guay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Moving Stacks or the Mouse
To: use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; delsp=yes;
format=flowed
Thom,
Thank
Roger,
You could capture the start points x,y and then you must know your end
points u,v and figure the stepping distance between the two. So if you
had x= 200 and u = 340 and you wanted a step of 10 then you could
repeat with a = x to u step 10 or (200, 210, 220, 230, 240...
320,330,340)
Or
Thom,
Thank you for this suggestion. First let me explain that I am
building an animated tutorial and otherwise agree with you on the
inadvisability of moving the mouse for the user. However my tutorial
I will require the "animation" of the mouse to occur over many
different paths acros