Hello Francis,
Le 10 juil. 2010 à 19:44, Francis Nugent Dixon a écrit :
Wonderful ! I have never seen so many complex
naming conventions that I am sure you don't follow.
If I bothered to think about naming conventions it is obviously to use it...
If you do, then it is for who ? If it is for
I'm using no naming convention.
I develop stacks with no variables, no handlers and no functions.
I only put objects in a card, drawing circles, rectangles and other
complex forms.
That's way I have never bugs in my stacks.
The next I have to understand now is why, when I'm clicking on a
button,
On 07/11/2010 04:08 PM, zryip theSlug wrote:
I'm using no naming convention.
I develop stacks with no variables, no handlers and no functions.
I only put objects in a card, drawing circles, rectangles and other
complex forms.
That's way I have never bugs in my stacks.
The next I have to
:-)
Le 11 juil. 2010 à 15:08, zryip theSlug a écrit :
I'm using no naming convention.
I develop stacks with no variables, no handlers and no functions.
I only put objects in a card, drawing circles, rectangles and other
complex forms.
That's way I have never bugs in my stacks.
The next
zryip theSlug wrote:
I'm using no naming convention.
I develop stacks with no variables, no handlers and no functions.
I only put objects in a card, drawing circles, rectangles and other
complex forms.
That's way I have never bugs in my stacks.
The next I have to understand now is why, when
2010/7/11 J. Landman Gay jac...@hyperactivesw.com:
The problem is that you are not thinking hard enough about what should
happen. Rev is telepathic and you need to concentrate.
The last time I tried, I squinted during 2 months, which is very
disabling for a slug.
--
-Zryip TheSlug- wish
Hi from Beautiful Brittany
(although we will have rain in two days !)
Richmond :
I agree with you (mostly)
David C :
Thanks for that comment! It's gratifying.
Rene Micout (excuse me if I wax into French) :
Je ne peux pas être plus en accord avec toi - Pour
dire vrai, je voulais secouer le
On 07/11/2010 11:15 PM, Francis Nugent Dixon wrote:
snip
As I haven't written programs in a REAL
development environment
What, pray tell, do you mean by a REAL development environment ?
I hope that that does not imply that you think that RunRev is NOT . . . .
snip
Question ! How many of
For what it is worth;
I always start a field's name with a lowercase 'f' - the rest in uppercase:
e.g. fSTUFF
so, similarly with other objects:
gSTUFF will be a group,
ggSTUFF will be a group containing subordinate groups,
iSTUFF is an image,
pSTUFF is (oddly enough) a graphic object
juillet 2010 12:18
À : How to use Revolution
Objet : My naming convention
For what it is worth;
I always start a field's name with a lowercase 'f' - the rest in uppercase:
e.g. fSTUFF
so, similarly with other objects:
gSTUFF will be a group,
ggSTUFF will be a group containing subordinate groups
Mine (sorry in French) :
Prefix of 2 chars for constant, variable, custom prop, handler, command,
function
Prefix of 3 chars for objects : button, field, group, slider, label, image,
graphic
-- PRÉFIXES (types des objets) :
--
ku = constante (unitaire)
kt = constante (tableau)
On 07/10/2010 02:20 PM, Damien Girard wrote:
Personnally I am using this naming convention:
- first letter in lowercase, then Uppercase for the first letter of each
word.
- tMyVariable - Variable available in the handler
- sMyVariable - Variable available in the script (local)
- gMyVariable -
On 07/10/2010 02:52 PM, René Micout wrote:
Mine (sorry in French) :
Prefix of 2 chars for constant, variable, custom prop, handler, command,
function
Prefix of 3 chars for objects : button, field, group, slider, label, image,
graphic
-- PRÉFIXES (types des objets) :
--
ku = constante
On Jul 10, 2010, at 3:18 AM, Richmond wrote:
vSTUFF is a variable
cSTUFF is a constant
sSTUFF is a string
aSTUFF is an array
-
needless-to-say; I almost NEVER adhere to this convention . . . :)
so what you mean to say is
NOT adhere to my naming convention.
___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
Richmond-
Saturday, July 10, 2010, 5:10:33 AM, you wrote:
I think this is great and we really out to carry on this htread with as
many poeple submitting their
naming conventions as possible; we might then be able to abstract some
sort of commonality
which would allow us to develop a more
Hi from Beautiful Brittany,
Sorry to put the proverbial cat among the pigeons !
Wonderful ! I have never seen so many complex
naming conventions that I am sure you don't follow.
If you do, then it is for who ? If it is for you,
this means that your organizational solutions
prime upon your
On 07/10/2010 08:44 PM, Francis Nugent Dixon wrote:
snip
Naming conventions are personal. They are
mostly designed to help YOU, maintain and
modify YOUR scripts in the future, if you
ever NEED to return to them !
1. Good point.
Forget naming conventions, and spend a little
time with
, everybody is using my naming convention that I told before, and
the productivity gain is incredible, cause, it is not Revolution, it is C,
and I am working on application that have more than 15000 lines, that
communicate with multiple card, and that have dozen threads and hundred
messages.
So
Hello Francis,
Revolution scripting is not to be pondered upon.
Just write it, as it flows out of your brain.
Heh... good, bad or otherwise, I seem to have mastered that part of
your message all too well. ;-)
Best regards,
David C.
___
20 matches
Mail list logo
