Re: OT OS X HD Partitioning, multiple OSs

2009-12-11 Thread Roger . E . Eller
On 12/05/2009 02:42 PM, Bill Marriott wrote: Roger, Also, you won't have to keep converting your hd file between Parallels and Fusion. They will both comfortably use the same BootCamp partition (not at the same time of course). This led to great unhappiness last time I tried it, and

Re: OT OS X HD Partitioning, multiple OSs

2009-12-07 Thread Andre Garzia
Sims, I have licenses for both Parallels (up to v 4) and VMWare Fusion and yet I've switched to virtualbox. I like sun virtualbox very much gives everything parallels and vmware ever did to me and yet it is free. I have the same machine as the one you're buying wondeful laptop. I use virtualbox

Re: OT OS X HD Partitioning, multiple OSs

2009-12-05 Thread Pierre Sahores
Hi Jim, Have an eye to Sun VirtualBox 3 (free), as a possible alternative to WMware. I switched from Parallels and never went back to it nor WMware. Run faster and safer than Parallels and never crashes. MBP Pro first gen (32 bits) - OS X 10.5.8 - 2 Go RAM - 300 GB 5400 t/ mn HD Win

Re: OT OS X HD Partitioning, multiple OSs

2009-12-05 Thread Bill Marriott
Your main choice is to Boot Camp or not to Boot Camp. Your second choice is which virtual machine product to use. If you Boot Camp, you gain the advantage that you can reboot your Mac into Windows natively. This has performance and compatibility benefits, especially with games that use

Re: OT OS X HD Partitioning, multiple OSs

2009-12-05 Thread Colin Holgate
On Dec 5, 2009, at 9:51 AM, Bill Marriott wrote: Parallels is decidedly faster than VMware (verified personally and by a few in-depth reviews out there). It offers the Aero interface from within the Mac (pretty), and a new presentation option I like called Crystal I own both, and switched

Re: OT OS X HD Partitioning, multiple OSs

2009-12-05 Thread Colin Holgate
I went ahead and ordered the Parallels 5 upgrade. I ordered the boxed version, hopefully I can find my old serial number by the time the box arrives! ___ use-revolution mailing list use-revolution@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe,

Re: OT OS X HD Partitioning, multiple OSs

2009-12-05 Thread Richard Gaskin
jim sims wrote: I might be getting a 13 160 GB MacBook Pro ... What have other people done with their machines? What OS(s) have you loaded - XP, Vista,Windows 7? If Linux, what flavor might be the best/most common to develop for? How did you partition it? What sizes for each? What

Re: OT OS X HD Partitioning, multiple OSs

2009-12-05 Thread Richmond Mathewson
Of course the cheap-jack end of the market (i.e. Richmond) does this: Pentium III with OEM Windows XP = $100 runs headless via Microsoft Remote Desktop Coonexion, Pentium 4 with Ubuntu 8.04.3 LTS 2nd-hand VDU keyboard = $100 6 year old G4 Mac = $52 on eBay at the moment VDU ($10) Can

Re: OT OS X HD Partitioning, multiple OSs

2009-12-05 Thread Roger . E . Eller
On 12/05/2009 at 01:30 PM, Colin Holgate wrote: The main advantage of Fusion and Parallels over Boot Camp is that you can carry on running your Mac apps, and can be dragging data directly between Mac OS and Windows, or directly opening a Mac document in a Windows application, while running

Re: OT OS X HD Partitioning, multiple OSs

2009-12-05 Thread Bill Marriott
Roger, Also, you won't have to keep converting your hd file between Parallels and Fusion. They will both comfortably use the same BootCamp partition (not at the same time of course). This led to great unhappiness last time I tried it, and constant re-activation of Windows, as well. - Bill

Re: OT OS X HD Partitioning, multiple OSs

2009-12-05 Thread Neal Campbell
There is indeed an alternative to just bootcamp or VMs, for Intel macs (not G4/5s) called rEFIt. Unlike Windows, Intel macs use a boot architecture called EFI. You can overwrite that with an open source product called rEFIt that boots into a screen that is similar to holding down the option key

Re: OT OS X HD Partitioning, multiple OSs

2009-12-04 Thread Mark Wieder
sims- Friday, December 4, 2009, 9:30:47 PM, you wrote: How did you partition it? What sizes for each? If you're using VMWare you don't need to set up separate partitions. The VMWare images for different operating systems are just files. -- -Mark Wieder mwie...@ahsoftware.net

Re: OT OS X HD Partitioning, multiple OSs

2009-12-04 Thread Jim Ault
Use the option of letting the vmware drive file auto-resize as needed, so start small. In case you find the 160 becomes too small... On my laptop I am doing a lot of video work, so I replaced the 160 Gb 5400 rpm with a 500 Gb 7200 rpm. Very easy to do. Bought the drive for $110, and did

Re: OT OS X HD Partitioning, multiple OSs

2009-12-04 Thread Richmond Mathewson
On 12/5/09 7:30 AM, jim sims wrote: I might be getting a 13 160 GB MacBook Pro I'm thinking of using VMware Fusion to add at least one version of Windows or maybe more. This will hopefully be my travel machine that I want to use for development while away, so I'd like to get all I might

Re: OT OS X HD Partitioning, multiple OSs

2009-12-04 Thread stephen barncard
Depends on the machine. Not so easy on 1st Gen Macbook Pro. It can be done by mortals but ugly,scary disassembly. - Stephen Barncard San Francisco http://houseofcubes.com/disco.irev 2009/12/4 Jim Ault jimaultw...@yahoo.com Use the option of letting the vmware drive file