RE: Cross-Platform Memory Inconsistencies

2005-12-17 Thread MisterX
Maybe it's time you admited pcs are not so bad after all ;) Welcome to the cross-plaform world... I hear standard buttons or animated gifs are a bad CPU cycle eater in the osx world... Xavier http://monsieurx.com/taoo - going where no object's been before -Original Message- From:

RE: Cross-Platform Memory Inconsistencies

2005-12-17 Thread MisterX
What I do not like is MS Windows. I can understand this... but you should have another look. As a standard UI It cannot be avoided and Moft - as much as I hated them - do try (and do get it right once in a while) to make a good job of it... Just like Rev tries to make all of us as happy as

Re: Cross-Platform Memory Inconsistencies

2005-12-17 Thread Eric Chatonet
Hi Richmond, From the docs (FAQ): How do I estimate how much memory your application will need? The amount of memory required by your standalone application depends on many factors, including the platform, the complexity of your code, which Revolution custom libraries you include, and how

Re: Cross-Platform Memory Inconsistencies

2005-12-17 Thread David Vaughan
On 17/12/2005, at 22:58, Mathewson [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote: Why does a stack on a CD run really quite well on a Pentium 2, 300MHz, 128 MB RAM (Win 98), a Pentium 3, 700 MHz, 128 MB RAM (Ubuntu 5.10) and grind to a shuddering halt on an iMac G3, 333MHz, 320 MB RAM (Mac 10.4)? This is a 'bother'