: Mark Schonewille [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: How to use Revolution use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Sent: Saturday, February 23, 2008 6:09 PM
Subject: Re: Wait with messages
Oh... Camm, not Curry, so sorry for that.
It is really friendly of you to thank me(?) in advance, but do you
have any more
-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Sent: Friday, February 22, 2008 1:37 PM
Subject: Re: Wait with messages
Hi Curry,
There might be a problem caused by the fact that the script is
currently running, but since I don't see how you change x, I am not
sure about this. Usually, I use a custom property
is pressed.
Thanks in advance
Camm
- Original Message -
From: Mark Schonewille [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: How to use Revolution use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Sent: Friday, February 22, 2008 1:37 PM
Subject: Re: Wait with messages
Hi Curry,
There might be a problem caused by the fact
: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 1 Nov 2004 14:59:58 -0700
Subject: Re: wait with messages revisited.
brOn Nov 1, 2004, at 9:24 AM, K wrote:brbrif gblA is true then return
truebrbrAre you actually doing this?brOr this?brbr if gblA then exit
repeatbrbrDarbr
I posted the below some days ago. I have further questions and further infomation.
In my testing of wait for X seconds with message:
Example code:
global gblA
global gblB
[Button A]
on mouseUp
repeat forever
put Waiting A return after field status
if gblA is true then return true
On Nov 1, 2004, at 9:24 AM, K wrote:
if gblA is true then return true
Are you actually doing this?
Or this?
if gblA then exit repeat
Dar
Dar Scott Consulting
http://www.swcp.com/dsc/
Programming Services
--- Dar Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Aug 12, 2004, at 6:16 PM, Erik Hansen wrote:
if you had your website URL as part of your
signoff then it would be easier to find
your stacks!
Like this?
Dar
Dar Scott Consulting
if you had your website URL as part of your
signoff then it would be easier to find
your stacks!
Thanks for the advice,
Erik Hansen
=
[EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.erikhansen.org
__
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail is new and improved - Check
On Aug 12, 2004, at 6:16 PM, Erik Hansen wrote:
if you had your website URL as part of your
signoff then it would be easier to find
your stacks!
Like this?
Dar
Dar Scott Consulting
http://www.swcp.com/dsc/
Programming Services
On Aug 10, 2004, at 2:06 PM, K wrote:
I seems that when I execute a wait with messages for a specific
contition and another event execute a wait with messages on a
different condition the seconds wait cancels the first.
In other mail:
Task aka event '1' is executing code but needs to wait for a
On Aug 11, 2004, at 9:55 AM, Dar Scott wrote:
Without polling what is the best way to wait (while messages continue
processing) for a viriable state to change? Since wait with messages
is presenting several anomalies I cannot explain.
One way would be to use a custom command (hander) to set the
: Dar Scott [mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2004 10:29:34 -0600
Subject: Re: wait with messages
brOn Aug 11, 2004, at 9:55 AM, Dar Scott wrote:brbr Without polling what is
the best way to wait (while messages continue br processing) for a viriable state
to change
Sorry, I did not explaine the situation well enough. I seems that when I execute a
wait with messages for a specific contition and another event execute a wait with
messages on a different condition the seconds wait cancels the first.
Kevin
-==-=-=-=-=-=-==-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-==-=-=-=-=-=-
On Aug 10, 2004, at 2:06 PM, K wrote:
Sorry, I did not explaine the situation well enough. I seems that
when I execute a wait with messages for a specific contition and
another event execute a wait with messages on a different condition
the seconds wait cancels the first.
The waits will nest.
On Aug 11, 2004, at 1:12 AM, Richard Gaskin wrote:
The Primer on Message Mechanics might give you some ideas, too. Find
it here:
http://www.swcp.com/dsc/revstacks.html
That's a wonderful tutorial Dar. The animated message path simulation
is great!
Thanks for posting that.
Yup. Should be
Recently, Chipp Walters [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can you provide an example where you would use one and not the other or
not 'send'?
Chipp -- I didn't see too many other responses here so I'll chime in...
One thing I recently started using wait with messages for is queuing a set
of sounds for
Thanks for the explanation.
How would you use:
wait for messages
and
wait with messages
??
Would it be something like:
wait for 4 seconds with messages
Right, allowing processing to continue while it waits.
wait for messages
(pauses handler until *any* message is received? and
Regarding remote popups, I'd like to add the esoteric information that you
need to use this wait with messages conditional in standalones that run
under mac system 7 as well as windows. 68k standalones tested under
emulation on a PPC don't need this, but when run under system 7 they behave
the
At 12:14 am -0600 1/2/04, Chipp Walters wrote:
Would it be something like:
wait for 4 seconds with messages
I'm not sure if that will work. The old Metacard docs only show the
with messages option being valid with the wait until or wait
while variations of wait. I.e. it needs a condition. But
On Sunday, February 1, 2004, at 02:47 AM, Dave Cragg wrote:
repeat until condition
wait for messages
end repeat
It seemed the same as this:
wait until condition with messages.
I think I get it. Use the first for testing something that will be set
by a callback. Use the second if there is no
--- Chipp Walters [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
YIH (yep it helps)
you talkin Tex ageein.
=
[EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.erikhansen.org
__
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free web site building tool. Try it!
http://webhosting.yahoo.com/ps/sb/
Chipp,
I usually use the form:
wait until something with messages
which allows for normal idle-time message processing while Rev waits.
For example, one thing that has been bugged in Bugzilla is that opening
up a popup menu remotely:
popup (long id of btn ContextPop of card 1 of stack
great power here, I just want to understand
how to use it!
YIH (yep it helps)
Chipp
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Ken Ray
Sent: Saturday, January 31, 2004 11:34 PM
To: 'How to use Revolution'
Subject: RE: wait with messages
At 5:26 PM -0800 2/25/2002, David Vaughan wrote:
Replying to myself ;-) ... of course the wait {N time} with messages
will wait the time you define while allowing other actions, and is not
accelerated by those actions, whereas wait {N time} simply waits. None
of this makes wait for messages,
OK, I've waited a bit for a Transcript guru to answer Bob's questions (in shortened form below) but nothing has clarified this so far. So I tried a couple of experiments myself, effectively replicating Bob's results. These are two of my tests:
In the stack I put this idle handler (oh shame!)
on
Bob
I think we can now answer some of your questions:
Why should it have worked the first time, but not subsequently?
In my experience, it never waited (in the indefinite sense) and I have no idea why it waited for you even once. Your system had some coincidental activity that slowed it down at
Title: Re: wait for messages
on 2/24/02 6:00 PM, Bob Rasmussen at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can anyone give me some insight about the wait for messages command?
--
I'm still a long ways from understanding all the new stuff in MC/RR different from HC, but I'm betting if no pending
27 matches
Mail list logo
