Andre-
Wednesday, September 15, 2010, 6:53:22 AM, you wrote:
> This could be replicated in Rev, pure RevTalk right now. It would not be
> 100% safe since we have a blocking engine but we could always use a monitor
> process to detect lock up and kill it. I think it was 2006 or something,
> that I
which are my primary web dev tools.
-
Andy Piddock
My software never has bugs. It just develops random features.
--
View this message in context:
http://runtime-revolution.278305.n4.nabble.com/Real-Basic-Web-edition-No-Plugin-Required-tp2540495p2540692.html
Sent from the Revolution - User
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 11:39 AM, Richard Gaskin wrote:
> I'll kick-start it: if someone will take the lead on this, I'll donate the
> code to translate native Rev controls on a card to HTML representations. I
> have chunks of it written for various projects now, so tidying those up and
> gener
David Bovill wrote:
On 15 September 2010 14:52, Richard Gaskin wrote:
Jun 27, 2006:
So in brief, if ToolBook could do this almost a decade ago I see
no reason why Rev couldn't also:
1. Identify a subset of things that would be useful in a browser.
2. Make a Rev library with hand
On 09/15/2010 04:52 PM, Richard Gaskin wrote:
David Bovill wrote:
On 15 September 2010 14:08, AndyP wrote:
I've noticed that Real Basic are about to launch a web edition.
Went to their site expecting a web plugin requirement and found this:
'REAL Studio Web Edition apps run as a FastCGI on
On 09/15/2010 04:45 PM, David Bovill wrote:
On 15 September 2010 14:08, AndyP wrote:
I've noticed that Real Basic are about to launch a web edition.
Went to their site expecting a web plugin requirement and found this:
'REAL Studio Web Edition apps run as a FastCGI on Apache.' !
http://www.
On 15 September 2010 14:53, Andre Garzia wrote:,
>
> This is beautiful but deploying FastCGI is not that trivial. Recovery must
> play a big part on the backend since the FastCGI stays resident (it should)
> in memory.
>
> This could be replicated in Rev, pure RevTalk right now. It would not be
>
On 15 September 2010 14:52, Richard Gaskin wrote:
>
> Jun 27, 2006:
>
>So in brief, if ToolBook could do this almost a decade ago I see
>no reason why Rev couldn't also:
>
>1. Identify a subset of things that would be useful in a browser.
>
>2. Make a Rev library with handlers to s
Folks,
This is beautiful but deploying FastCGI is not that trivial. Recovery must
play a big part on the backend since the FastCGI stays resident (it should)
in memory.
This could be replicated in Rev, pure RevTalk right now. It would not be
100% safe since we have a blocking engine but we could
David Bovill wrote:
On 15 September 2010 14:08, AndyP wrote:
I've noticed that Real Basic are about to launch a web edition.
Went to their site expecting a web plugin requirement and found this:
'REAL Studio Web Edition apps run as a FastCGI on Apache.' !
http://www.realsoftware.com/web/ ht
On 15 September 2010 14:08, AndyP wrote:
>
> I've noticed that Real Basic are about to launch a web edition.
> Went to their site expecting a web plugin requirement and found this:
>
> 'REAL Studio Web Edition apps run as a FastCGI on Apache.' !
>
> http://www.realsoftware.com/web/ http://www.rea
for RunRev to go for the web and avoid plugins
altogether. Wouldn't this open up the uses and market for RunRev?
-
Andy Piddock
My software never has bugs. It just develops random features.
--
View this message in context:
http://runtime-revolution.278305.n4.nabble.com/Real-Basic-
12 matches
Mail list logo
