Re: valentina and rev 2.0 (Jan Schenkel)

2003-06-21 Thread Tuviah M Snyder
a. I open my Valentina database using RunRev's built-in database query builder; the database has several distinct tables, only one of which has a unique primary key, though the rest all have records that can be uniquely identified by field combinations. Now one thing that throws me is

new altPlugins for Rev 2.0

2003-06-21 Thread Chipp Walters
I've recently updated my altPlugins Control Strip for Rev 2.0. Please note there are DIFFERENT VERSIONS for Rev 1.1 (and 1.1.1) vs Rev 2.0. Both can be found at: http://www.altuit.com/webs/altuit2/RunRev/default.htm For 2.0 users, I've added a New mainstack and Open Stack button, since

valentina and rev 2.0

2003-06-18 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Well, I have been working away trying to write a good dictionary program for an endangered language i work with. i have been trying to use the valentina xcmd and runrev 2.0, on both mac os x.2.6 and mac os 9.2.2. so far, my results are dismal, to say the least. here are some problems: a. I

Re: valentina and rev 2.0

2003-06-18 Thread Jan Schenkel
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Well, I have been working away trying to write a good dictionary program for an endangered language i work with. i have been trying to use the valentina xcmd and runrev 2.0, on both mac os x.2.6 and mac os 9.2.2. so far, my results are

Re: valentina and rev 2.0

2003-06-18 Thread Mark Brownell
On Wednesday, June 18, 2003, at 11:22 AM, Jan Schenkel wrote: Hi Rand, I'm sorry to read your attempts have been unsuccessful. Let's see if we can get you out of this situation and back on track. I'll comment per question. Hi, Please don't hold me to it because this is from my weekend learning

Re: valentina and rev 2.0

2003-06-18 Thread Jan Schenkel
--- Mark Brownell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wednesday, June 18, 2003, at 11:22 AM, Jan Schenkel wrote: Hi Rand, I'm sorry to read your attempts have been unsuccessful. Let's see if we can get you out of this situation and back on track. I'll comment per question. Hi,

Re: valentina and rev 2.0

2003-06-18 Thread Mark Brownell
On Wednesday, June 18, 2003, at 11:50 AM, Jan Schenkel wrote: Hi Mark, That's nothing to be ashamed of ; my memories of certain periods of my life are kind of blurry -- now if you couldn't remember that you just sent this mail, that's when I'd advise you seek some help ;-) Jokes aside, this

Re: valentina and rev 2.0 [potential publishers for RunRev TheBook]

2003-06-18 Thread Jim Hurley
Message: 1 Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2003 11:22:03 -0700 (PDT) From: Jan Schenkel [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: valentina and rev 2.0 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (snip) Yes, a good thorough book that would cover certain aspects from top to bottom, would be a welcome addition

Re: valentina and rev 2.0

2003-06-18 Thread Robert Brenstein
That's nothing to be ashamed of ; my memories of certain periods of my life are kind of blurry -- now if you couldn't remember that you just sent this mail, that's when I'd advise you seek some help ;-) Jokes aside, this juggling with cursors is a big problem when using the revdb functions with

Start Rev 2.0 = CPU 100%

2003-06-09 Thread Nicholas Thieberger
I am also having erratic start-up freezes at the 'loading plug-ins' stage. Freezes 4 times out of five Nick Thieberger Subject: Start Rev 2.0 = CPU 100% From: David Egbert [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] I've read that there a bug

RE: Rev 2.0 ERROR on Windows XP

2003-06-06 Thread Roger . E . Eller
I have tried the reboot/reinstall, but it did not work. Next, I will try Monte's recommendation. It looks to me like this is something that RunRev will need to tackle for the next update. Thanks everyone! Roger Eller [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Rev 2.0 ERROR on Windows XP

2003-06-05 Thread Heather Williams
From: Chipp Walters [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Rev 2.0 ERROR on Windows XP Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2003 13:44:24 -0500 Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Roger, I, too, have seen this problem. I think it has to do with either a removable drive or a pending CD-write to a XP

Rev 2.0 ERROR on Windows XP

2003-06-05 Thread Roger . E . Eller
I have installed Rev 2.0 on Win2k and MacOSX with good results. However, My Windows XP installation is not usable because the following error repeatedly pops up as a prompt window. Insert disk into drive \Device\Harddisk1\DR3. Has anyone else seen this on Windows XP or know of a solution

RE: Rev 2.0 ERROR on Windows XP

2003-06-05 Thread Chipp Walters
, uninstall RR2.0 (and any other version of 2.0 beta) and reinstall. That should do the trick. best, Chipp -- I have installed Rev 2.0 on Win2k and MacOSX with good results. However, My Windows XP installation is not usable because the following error repeatedly pops up as a prompt window. Insert

Re: Rev 2.0 ERROR on Windows XP

2003-06-05 Thread Jim Biancolo
: I have installed Rev 2.0 on Win2k and MacOSX with good results. However, My Windows XP installation is not usable because the following error repeatedly pops up as a prompt window. Insert disk into drive \Device\Harddisk1\DR3. Has anyone else seen this on Windows XP or know of a solution? Roger

RE: Rev 2.0 ERROR on Windows XP

2003-06-05 Thread Monte Goulding
I have installed Rev 2.0 on Win2k and MacOSX with good results. However, My Windows XP installation is not usable because the following error repeatedly pops up as a prompt window. Insert disk into drive \Device\Harddisk1\DR3. Has anyone else seen this on Windows XP or know of a solution

weird behavior in Rev 2.0

2003-05-29 Thread Chris Sheffield
I'm having a problem with a stack in version 2.0. I was editing some code, and all of a sudden things starting responding very slowly. I would click a button and it would take 3 or 4 seconds before anything happened. I opened the Message Watcher, only to find that Rev was sending some message

Rev 2.0 printing

2003-02-04 Thread Dave LeYanna
It is still happening to me. The double,triple line stuff from Win 2000 to HPIIIsi and micro print 1/32 point type from Win98 to same printer. The same, doesn't matter which version of Rev. I use. The print drivers are the newest ones. BTW FYI, printing from Inspired Logic's Navigator seems to

Re: Cost to update Rev 2.0 to Rev 2.5

2003-02-03 Thread Mark Brownell
Date: Sun, 2 Feb 2003 19:32:57 +0100; Terry Vogelaar Wrote: searched their website for the upgrade policy and could not find information on future upgrades or time limits for free upgrades when you purchase Revolution. Upgrading costs $299 at the moment. You can find that information on

Re: Cost to update Rev 2.0 to Rev 2.5

2003-02-03 Thread Kevin Miller
On 3/2/03 12:56 pm, Mark Brownell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Upgrading costs $299 at the moment. You can find that information on their website at the online store under Professional User License. I saw that at the website. So what happens if I wait more than one year before upgrading? I'm

Cost to update Rev 2.0 to Rev 2.5

2003-02-02 Thread Mark Brownell
when you purchase Revolution. To be specific I've been talking with people that are developing future XML capabilities for Revolution that might get added to Rev 2.5 but not be available in Rev 2.0. So if I purchase the full priced Rev 2.0, aprox $999, what will be the costs when new versions

Re: Cost to update Rev 2.0 to Rev 2.5

2003-02-02 Thread Björnke von Gierke
upgrades or time limits for free upgrades when you purchase Revolution. To be specific I've been talking with people that are developing future XML capabilities for Revolution that might get added to Rev 2.5 but not be available in Rev 2.0. So if I purchase the full priced Rev 2.0, aprox $999

Re: Cost to update Rev 2.0 to Rev 2.5

2003-02-02 Thread Terry Vogelaar
Mark Brownell heeft op zondag, 2 feb 2003 om 17:12 het volgende geschreven: I was wondering if anyone knew about the cost to upgrade if you have the aprox $999.00 pro licensed version of the current Rev development app. I searched their website for the upgrade policy and could not find

Re: Standalone for MacOS X and rev. 2.0

2002-12-30 Thread Ludovic Thébault
with MetaCard, is a package (a folder, but for OS X an application). With packages, all datas are inclued in the standalone. Rev 2.0 can create packages ? Or it is possible to convert standalone in packages ? ___ use-revolution mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http

Re: Rev 2.0

2002-11-25 Thread Malte Brill
we all should give a very big hand to our german revolutionist Mr. Malte Brill, who wrote these two articles. Hey Klaus, you make me blush! ;-) are these on the web? Sorrowly not (yet). If anyone is interested in reading the German review, I will try to make a PDF version of it, and send it

Rev 2.0

2002-11-22 Thread yves COPPE
Hello, Just to let the pressure going higher : next week should be THE week...!!! I sleep very bad since 2 days...I'm waiting very impatiently... -- Greetings. Yves COPPE Email : [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ use-revolution mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Rev 2.0

2002-11-22 Thread Rod McCall
Dear Yves, We will be discussing the final date shortly. However I would advise against any customers getting sleepless nights over Revolution. While the team are excited about the up and coming release we all try to get a good nights sleep after a hard days work, I would advise all our

Re: Rev 2.0

2002-11-22 Thread Klaus Major
Hi all, ... As an aside there are two articles in MacLife Germany: 11/2002 A full and excellent review of Revolution 1.1.1 12/2002 A tutorial of 1.1.1 we all should give a very big hand to our german revolutionist Mr. Malte Brill, who wrote these two articles. Thank you Malte ;-) Regards

[OT] report manager in rev 2.0; what to do today?

2002-11-22 Thread Alex Rice
I am looking at the Report Manager scren grab on http://runrev.com/news/revolution20.html . Is the Report Manager just a GUI for already existing programmatic interfaces, or are there new printing features being delivered? In 1.1.1, I want to print a report containing a very large scrolling

Re: Rev 2.0

2002-11-22 Thread erik hansen
--- Klaus Major [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: As an aside there are two articles in MacLife Germany: 11/2002 A full and excellent review of Revolution 1.1.1 12/2002 A tutorial of 1.1.1 we all should give a very big hand to our german revolutionist Mr. Malte Brill, who wrote these two

Re: when will rev 2.0 ship?

2002-11-13 Thread Timothy Hart
Feels like forever. Let's hope not the 30th. If that is the case they should have just said December. Not that I am complaining or anything. I am just very eager to use it. -Tim ___ use-revolution mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: when will rev 2.0 ship?

2002-11-13 Thread Kevin Miller
On 13/11/02 11:46 am, Timothy Hart [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Feels like forever. Let's hope not the 30th. If that is the case they should have just said December. Not that I am complaining or anything. I am just very eager to use it. We don't have an exact date yet. All I can say is that

Re: when will rev 2.0 ship?

2002-11-13 Thread Rod McCall
At 08:10 13/11/2002 -0800, you wrote: anybody got an answer to the subject line's question? Hi Oliver, If anyone does, it's Rod... but he couldn't possibly comment. :{`) Your right I couldn't possibly comment :-) However I will say that development is going well and an