I think at some point the RevBrowser needs to be completely reworked so that
the browser is attached not to a window but to an object like a field or a
button. Perhaps even a new object called a View Port or something. The way it
works now causes all kinds of problems if you try to do anything
I'm just curious, I guess... is it only during dev in the IDE that you are
toggling the resizable of a stack? Or if you do it at runtime, I'd be
curious to find how you're applying this functionality...
In my current project I need to toggle this according to some META TAGs
inside of the
On 10/7/10 9:44 PM, Ken Ray wrote:
I'm just curious, I guess... is it only during dev in the IDE that you are
toggling the resizable of a stack? Or if you do it at runtime, I'd be
curious to find how you're applying this functionality...
In my current project I need to toggle this according to
Hi all,
I just filed a bug report for a nasty bug I found today and wanted to let you
know.
When you toggle the resizable of a stack with an active browser, the content
of the browser will disappear in data nirvana :-/
Try it yourself:
Open an URL in any browser and toggle the resizable of
Hi all,
Hi all,
I just filed a bug report for a nasty bug I found today and wanted to let you
know.
When you toggle the resizable of a stack with an active browser, the
content
of the browser will disappear in data nirvana :-/
Try it yourself:
Open an URL in any browser and
This happens because the revbrowser instance is linked to a specific
windowid and certain things change that id. As you mentioned changing the
resizable, going fullscreen, and if I recall correctly, changing the window
decorations all change the windowid. Haven't tried it but changing window
mode
Hi Mike,
This happens because the revbrowser instance is linked to a specific
windowid and certain things change that id. As you mentioned changing the
resizable, going fullscreen, and if I recall correctly, changing the window
decorations all change the windowid. Haven't tried it but
Done.
I've fought with this before. Its a real pain in the butt. Did things like
setup the browser stack as a float on top stack that was docked with the
stack behind. Then I could do stuff with the back stack and have the front
respond. Never did work very well.
Ended up doing as you
can someone confirm this is a regression?
Did it happen in 4.0 or 3.x ?
On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 9:58 AM, Mike Bonner bonnm...@gmail.com wrote:
Done.
I've fought with this before. Its a real pain in the butt. Did things like
setup the browser stack as a float on top stack that was docked with
Hi Andre,
can someone confirm this is a regression?
Did it happen in 4.0 or 3.x ?
I also tested this on Rev 3.4 and 4.0, same problem.
Best
Klaus
--
Klaus Major
http://www.major-k.de
kl...@major.on-rev.com
___
use-revolution mailing list
On 10/6/10 9:58 AM, Klaus on-rev kl...@major.on-rev.com wrote:
Hi Andre,
can someone confirm this is a regression?
Did it happen in 4.0 or 3.x ?
I also tested this on Rev 3.4 and 4.0, same problem.
But isn't this just when you turn the resizable of a stack on and off? I
mean if the stack
Hi Ken,
On 10/6/10 9:58 AM, Klaus on-rev kl...@major.on-rev.com wrote:
Hi Andre,
can someone confirm this is a regression?
Did it happen in 4.0 or 3.x ?
I also tested this on Rev 3.4 and 4.0, same problem.
But isn't this just when you turn the resizable of a stack on and off?
Yep and if
12 matches
Mail list logo
