Thank you very much Ms DeVoto; however, in light of the
fact that all the info contained in your stack has been
'redistributed' in newer recensions of RR I will not port
my stand-alone version. I have, as you can see, posted a
method for all who can be bothered to "dig it out" - after
all, that see
At 4:09 PM -0500 12/5/2005, Mathewson wrote:
I dug out the Revolution Encyclopedia and ported it as a
free-standing stack so that users of later editions of
DC/MC/RR can use it (popped in a couple of nav buttons).
HOWEVER . . . I noticed it is the work of Ms DeVoto . . .
I am perfectly happy
I am posting this information on the understanding that
anybody who follows this course of action will NOT
distribute the resultant free-standing stack anywhere -
keep it on your machine at home, nothing else, Please!
In various versions of RR there is a folder called
"revencyclopedia.rev " /COMPO
OK, bottom line...
How do I get this encyclopedia?
I still have older versions of Rev somewhere and I'm sure I can extract
them...
Dave
Mathewson wrote:
I will keep my port of the R Enc. to myself in the light of
Chipp's and Eric's messages.
BUT . . .
This set of messages and many others
I will keep my port of the R Enc. to myself in the light of
Chipp's and Eric's messages.
BUT . . .
This set of messages and many others seem to have a common,
underlying theme . . .
NOT that the RR documentation is bad - Its not!
BUT that it is BADLY ORGANISED - or, at the very least,
AWKWARD t
Hi Richmond and Chipp,
Le 6 déc. 05 à 07:57, Chipp Walters a écrit :
There have been other stacks which import the content of the help
files and other XML data which ships with Rev. Perhaps that's the
tact you should try? IOW, create a stack which is empty but then
imports the Dictionary a
Richmond,
There have been other stacks which import the content of the help files
and other XML data which ships with Rev. Perhaps that's the tact you
should try? IOW, create a stack which is empty but then imports the
Dictionary and other data from the included XML files. This way, RR gets
t
So, Revolution Encyclopedia was produced by Ms DeVoto under
contract to RR . . .
Runtime Revolution have seemed reluctant to reply to
messages from me in the past (really ? surely not ?) so I
would be extremely grateful if one of the 'Princes of the
Church' (sorry, had to pause ther
Mathewson wrote:
I dug out the Revolution Encyclopedia and ported it as a
free-standing stack so that users of later editions of
DC/MC/RR can use it (popped in a couple of nav buttons).
HOWEVER . . . I noticed it is the work of Ms DeVoto . . .
I am perfectly happy to upload it to my website
I dug out the Revolution Encyclopedia and ported it as a
free-standing stack so that users of later editions of
DC/MC/RR can use it (popped in a couple of nav buttons).
HOWEVER . . . I noticed it is the work of Ms DeVoto . . .
I am perfectly happy to upload it to my website, BUT ONLY
if I can
From: "J. Landman Gay"
Jerry Muelver wrote:
Is the Encyclopedia better exposed in more recent versions of Revolution?
Unfortunately I don't think it even ships with later versions.
Oh. Well, then... It looks like I've got a jump-start on sources for my
"Beginner's Guide to Revolution" p
Jerry Muelver wrote:
Is the Encyclopedia better exposed in more recent versions of Revolution?
Unfortunately I don't think it even ships with later versions.
--
Jacqueline Landman Gay | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
HyperActive Software | http://www.hyperactivesw.com
___
I just, a couple of minutes ago, stumbled into the Revolution Encyclopedia
in the Rev 2.2.1 Help files. "Stumbled"... STUMBLED!... by following a "See
Also" link in a Transcript Language Dictionary topic.
This is too seminal a reference source to be buried in a "whe
13 matches
Mail list logo
