Re: Single Point Property Creation/Assignment

2005-08-04 Thread Dennis Brown
Stephen, I took a little different approach to using custom properties and sets to avoid the use of the Do. I leave the default set as the normal operating mode and access a few global parameters in the normal way: get myParam of object I create sets to hold other sets of parameters, but I

Single Point Property Creation/Assignment

2005-08-03 Thread Stephen Barncard
Hi gang, I'm creating a central management system for settings using user properties. I want to use one central routine to access the preferences stack. To do that, I am working with a handler that creates and sets a custom property INSIDE a custom property set - all set at once. I got the

Re: Single Point Property Creation/Assignment

2005-08-03 Thread Ken Ray
On 8/3/05 11:02 PM, Stephen Barncard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi gang, I'm creating a central management system for settings using user properties. I want to use one central routine to access the preferences stack. To do that, I am working with a handler that creates and sets a custom

Re: Single Point Property Creation/Assignment

2005-08-03 Thread Trevor DeVore
On Aug 3, 2005, at 10:03 PM, Ken Ray wrote: Well, as long as the variable holds a value, you don't need to use do for the *variable* part of it, i.e. this: put Test into tProp set the uPropSet[tProp] of this stack to Hello is the same as: put Test into tProp do set the uPropSet[