Thanks a lot!
All the Best
Dave
On 21 Apr 2006, at 13:51, Pierre Sahores wrote:
This info is from Guy Petinon (french rev list) :
Pour changer la version d'une pile:
ouvri "message boxe" et taper
"set the stackfileversion to 2.5" par exemple à partir
de la version 2.7
To change the stack's
This info is from Guy Petinon (french rev list) :
Pour changer la version d'une pile:
ouvri "message boxe" et taper
"set the stackfileversion to 2.5" par exemple à partir
de la version 2.7
To change the stack's version from 2.7 to (as an example) to 2.5 :
just type "set the stackfileversion t
I hope so! That's great!
All the Best
Dave
On 20 Apr 2006, at 14:36, Geoff Canyon wrote:
I think saving in the pre-2.7 format is available in the upcoming
release.
gc
On Apr 20, 2006, at 2:41 AM, David Burgun wrote:
Hi All,
I really can't understand all the mystery surrounding this "fix
David Burgun wrote:
I really can't understand all the mystery surrounding this "fix" to
allow backwards compatibility.
The beta testers know about it (if you purchase Enterprise, you are
automatically on that list,) but the details were pulled from the final
release for a number of reasons
I think saving in the pre-2.7 format is available in the upcoming
release.
gc
On Apr 20, 2006, at 2:41 AM, David Burgun wrote:
Hi All,
I really can't understand all the mystery surrounding this "fix" to
allow backwards compatibility. As far as I understand it, there is
a way to tell the
Hi Dave,
I had contacted Mark a bit ago about the stackFileVersion property and
he said it's ok to mention it, but it might be renamed or go away later,
so it's not officially supported.
If you click the 'update' button on the StackFormat plugin of mine,
you'll download a new version which i
Hi All,
I really can't understand all the mystery surrounding this "fix" to
allow backwards compatibility. As far as I understand it, there is a
way to tell the engine to save in the old format or the new format,
with version 2.7 defaulting to the newer format. That all sounds
reasonable.
Thanks J,
This does clear things up for me. It is totally understandable now
why they need to upgrade the version number and that it is normal too.
Thanks
Tom
On Feb 23, 2006, at 6:53 PM, J. Landman Gay wrote:
Rob Cozens wrote:
Jacque, et al:
It isn't any different than when HyperCard m
Rob Cozens wrote:
Jacque, et al:
It isn't any different than when HyperCard made the change
Unless memory fails me, yes it is: that upgrade was free to owners of
the previous version.
I believe the 2.x update happened when HC was moved to Claris and we had
to start buying our copies. At
Jacque, et al:
It isn't any different than when HyperCard made the change
Unless memory fails me, yes it is: that upgrade was free to owners of
the previous version.
Do you intend to distribute all future stacks you release publicly in
v.2.7+ and leave people who continue to work in v<2.7
Rob Cozens wrote:
Jacque, et al:
The stack file format in 2.7 has changed. Be aware that any stacks you
save in 2.7 will not open again in earlier versions.
Runtime Revolution, like HyperCard, now has different versions of
software in use around the world producing incompatible output. Wha
Hi everyone,
I second Rob with all my might.
The result of this format change is pathetic.
This means that Rev 2.6.1 *must* be used to build stacks able to be
shared with the community (i.e. without the ability of using next Rev
versions enhancements).
And for those who will not have Rev pri
Hi everyone,
I second Rob with all my might.
The result of this format change is pathetic.
This means that Rev 2.6.1 *must* be used to build stacks able to be
shared with the community (i.e. without the ability of using next Rev
versions enhancements).
And for those who will not have Rev pri
Jacque, et al:
The stack file format in 2.7 has changed. Be aware that any stacks you
save in 2.7 will not open again in earlier versions.
Runtime Revolution, like HyperCard, now has different versions of
software in use around the world producing incompatible output. What
does this mean fo
t; Subject: Re: Stack file format change in 2.7 - BACK UP!
>
> I wrote:
> > Just a word of warning. The stack file format in 2.7 has
> changed. Be
> > aware that any stacks you save in 2.7 will not open again
> in earlier
> > versions. Make backups if you
I wrote:
Just a word of warning. The stack file format in 2.7 has changed. Be
aware that any stacks you save in 2.7 will not open again in earlier
versions. Make backups if you plan to work on stacks later with older
engines.
This behavior is marginally documented in the What's New file, but
Just a word of warning. The stack file format in 2.7 has changed. Be
aware that any stacks you save in 2.7 will not open again in earlier
versions. Make backups if you plan to work on stacks later with older
engines.
This behavior is marginally documented in the What's New file, but
doesn't s
17 matches
Mail list logo
